journal article·2022-08-28Open access

Advances in titanium bio-implants: Alloy design, surface engineering and manufacturing processes

Sarabjeet Singh Sidhu, Mohamed Abdel-Hady Gepreel, Marjan Bahraminasab

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 37· Issue 16

Abstract

Metallic biomaterials have been widely used as load-bearing prostheses, internal fixation devices, vascular/nonvascular stents and dental brackets, wires and implants because of their excellent mechanical strength and resilience. Metallic biomaterials are advancing rapidly with the innovative design and development of titanium (Ti)-based biomaterials due to their superior mechanical behavior, chemical properties, and biocompatibility. Even though Ti and its alloys are generally trusted for biomedical applications, there is still room for improvement because of the mechanical mismatch between bone and implant and the need for higher bioactivity. In recent years, much attention has been given to the design of new Ti alloys with improved properties tailoring processes such as heat treatment and severe plastic deformation, surface functionalization for fabricating implants with lower elastic moduli in combination with higher strength and better biocompatibility. Porous Ti has also attracted increasing interest because the 3D porous network can provide a favorable environment for bone in-growth and possess bone-like mechanical properties. Thus far, considerable efforts have been made to develop new manufacturing techniques for producing porous Ti, such as powder metallurgy and the additive manufacturing techniques.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. H. Eskandari, H.R. Lashgari, S. Zangeneh et al., Microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of SLM-printed Ti–6Al–4V alloy: effect of build orientation. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00468-z10.1557/s43578-021-00468-z ↗
2. N. Erwin, D. Sur, G.B. Basim, Remediation of machining medium effect on biocompatibility of titanium-based dental implants by chemical mechanical nano-structuring. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00553-x10.1557/s43578-022-00553-x ↗
3. A.H. Jabbari, F. Farahmand, Advances in Titanium Bio-Implants (Sidhu). J. Mater. Res. (2022) (Accepted)
4. L. Klinge, C. Siemers, L. Kluy et al., Nanostructured Ti–13Nb–13Zr for dental implant applications produced by severe plastic deformation. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00587-110.1557/s43578-022-00587-1 ↗
5. F. Haase, C. Siemers, J. Rösler, Two novel titanium alloys for medical applications: thermo-mechanical treatment, mechanical properties, and fracture analysis. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00605-210.1557/s43578-022-00605-2 ↗
6. N. Singh, V. Edachery, M. Rajput et al., Ti6Al7Nb–TiB nanocomposites for ortho-implant applications. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00578-210.1557/s43578-022-00578-2 ↗
7. M. Mohammadtaheri, M. Bozorg, A. Yazdani et al., Fabrication of Ti–Al2O3–HA composites by spark plasma sintering and its properties for medical applications. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00561-x10.1557/s43578-022-00561-x ↗
8. M.K. Gouda, S.A. Salman, S. Ebied et al., Biocompatibility and corrosion resistance of low-cost Ti–14Mn–Zr alloys. J. Mater. Res. 36, 4883–4893 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00441-w10.1557/s43578-021-00441-w ↗
9. N.B. Abdullah, D. Miyazaki, E. Yamamoto et al., Effect of low modulus titanium plate fixation on rabbit femur bone healing. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00616-z10.1557/s43578-022-00616-z ↗
10. O. Yigit, B. Dikici, M. Kaseem et al., Facile formation with HA/Sr–GO-based composite coatings via green hydrothermal treatment on β-type TiNbTaZr alloys: morphological and electrochemical insights. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-021-00470-510.1557/s43578-021-00470-5 ↗
11. A. Jaafar, C. Schimpf, M. Mandel et al., Sol–gel derived hydroxyapatite coating on titanium implants: optimization of sol–gel process and engineering the interface. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00550-010.1557/s43578-022-00550-0 ↗
12. J. Singh, S.S. Chatha, H. Singh, In vitro assessment of plasma-sprayed reinforced hydroxyapatite coatings deposited on Ti6Al4V alloy for bio-implant applications. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00549-710.1557/s43578-022-00549-7 ↗
13. P.R. Chowdhury, S. Vahabzadeh, Deposition of magnesium on surface-modified titanium for biomedical applications. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00611-410.1557/s43578-022-00611-4 ↗
14. F.J. Gil, R.A. Pérez, J. Olmos et al., The effect of using Al2O3 and TiO2 in sandblasting of titanium dental implants. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00534-010.1557/s43578-022-00534-0 ↗
15. B.B. Straumal, A.S. Gornakova, M.V. Kiselevskiy et al., Optimal surface roughness of Ti6Al4V alloy for the adhesion of cells with osteogenic potential. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00600-710.1557/s43578-022-00600-7 ↗
16. Y.C. Liu, T.W. Xu, B.Q. Sun et al., Effect of strontium-doped coating prepared by microarc oxidation and hydrothermal treatment on apatite induction ability of Ti13Nb13Zr alloy in vitro. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00626-x10.1557/s43578-022-00626-x ↗
17. M. Singh, A.S. Gill, P.K. Deol et al., Drug eluting titanium implants for localised drug delivery. J. Mater. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1557/s43578-022-00609-y10.1557/s43578-022-00609-y ↗