Finite Element Model Analysis of Pipes Embedded in Controlled Low-Strength Material under Seismic Wave Propagation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. ASCE, “Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems,” American Society of Civil Engineers, 1984, Reston, VA.
2. Newmark, N. M., “Problems in Wave Propagation in Soil and Rock,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wave Propagation and Dynamic Properties of Earth Materials, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 1967, pp. 7-26.
3. Raghavendra, T., and Udayashankar, B. C., “Flow and Strength Characteristics of CLSM Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, V. 26, No. 9, 2014, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000092710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000927 ↗
4. Halmen, C., and Shah, H., “Controlled Low-Strength Materials Composed Solely of By-Products,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 112, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2015, pp. 239-246. doi: 10.14359/5168698710.14359/51686987 ↗
5. Alizadeh, V.; Helwany, S.; Ghorbanpoor, A.; and Oliva, M., “Rapid-Construction Technique for Bridge Abutments Using Controlled Low-Strength Materials,” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, V. 28, No. 1, 2014, pp. 149-156. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000041210.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000412 ↗
6. ACI Committee 229, “Report on Controlled Low-Strength Materials (ACI 229R-13),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2013, 22 pp.
7. Ling, T. C.; Kaliyavaradhan, S. K.; and Poon, C. S., “Global Perspective on Application of Controlled Low-Strength Material (CLSM) for Trench Backfilling—An Overview,” Construction and Building Materials, V. 158, Jan. 2018, pp. 535-548. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.050 ↗
8. Lee, H., “Finite Element Analysis of a Buried Pipeline,” MS thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 2010.
9. Psyrras, N. K., and Sextos, A. G., “Safety of Buried Steel Natural Gas Pipelines under Earthquake-Induced Ground Shaking: A Review,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, V. 106, Mar. 2018, pp. 254-277. doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.02010.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.020 ↗
10. Sahoo, S.; Manna, B.; and Sharma, K. G., “Seismic Behaviour of Buried Pipelines: 3D Finite Element Approach,” Journal of Earthquakes, V. 2014, July 2014, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.1155/2014/81892310.1155/2014/818923 ↗
11. Alizadeh, V.; Helwany, S.; Ghorbanpoor, A.; Oliva, M.; and Ghaderi, R., “CLSM Bridge Abutments—Finite Element Modeling and Parametric Study,” Computers and Geotechnics, V. 64, Mar. 2015, pp. 61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.10.01510.1016/j.compgeo.2014.10.015 ↗
12. Lin, M. C., “Seismic Response Analysis of Flexible Pavements Embedded with CLSM Bases Using Finite Element Method,” Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Applied System Innovation, Sapporo, Japan, 2017, pp. 1316-1319.10.1109/ICASI.2017.7988143 ↗
13. Bellaver, F., “Large Diameter Steel Pipe Field Test Using Controlled Low Strength Material and Staged Construction Modeling Using 3-D Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis,” MS thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 2013.
14. Goodling, E. C., “Buried Piping—An Analysis Procedure Update,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, PVP-77, ASME, Portland, OR, 1983, pp. 225-237.
15. Somboonyanon, P., and Halmen, C., “3D Finite Element Seismic Simulation of Steel Pipelines Embedded in Different Backfills,” Pipelines 2016: Out of Sight, Out of Mind, Not Out of Risk, Kansas City, MO, 2016, pp. 1875-1886.10.1061/9780784479957.175 ↗
16. Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD), http://www.strongmotioncenter.org
17. Yang, R., and Zhang, S., “Study on Mechanical Behaviors of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Three-Dimensional Earthquake Input Motions,” Proceedings of ICPTT 2011: Sustainable Solutions for Water, Sewer, Gas, and Oil Pipelines, 2011, pp. 1802-1809.10.1061/41202(423)190 ↗
18. Shah, H., “Controlled Low-Strength Material (CLSM) Produced from Limestone Fines and Other Byproducts,” MS thesis, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 2012.