journal article·2020-04-28Open access

Prediction of relative globularization rates in α + β titanium alloys as a function of initial crystal orientation

Benjamin A. Begley, Keith Markham, Michael Mizak, Adam L. Pilchak, Victoria M. Miller

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 35· Issue 8

Abstract

The breakdown of the columnar grains and lamellar α + β colony microstructure in two-phase Ti alloys during conversion of ingot to billet is critical to the development of desired combination of mechanical properties. Colony breakdown occurs during a series of thermomechanical processing steps in the α + β phase field. However, fundamental knowledge of the microstructural dependence of this transformation is limited, particularly its dependence on the initial orientation of the α + β colony relative to the imposed strain-path. In this study, the viscoplastic self-consistent polycrystal plasticity model is used to examine deformation behavior as a function of crystal loading direction. Criteria were developed to predict relative globularization rates; it was found that both slip system activities in the α phase and relative crystal rotations of each phase must be considered. Predictions are demonstrated to be consistent with literature and suggest that further experimental investigation of relative globularization rates is necessary.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.01610.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.016 ↗
2. Miller · 2016 · 257
3. 10.1007/s11661-013-2162-410.1007/s11661-013-2162-4 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.05710.1016/j.actamat.2016.04.057 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.02310.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.023 ↗
6. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.6310.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.160.63 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11661-004-0246-x10.1007/s11661-004-0246-x ↗
8. 10.1007/s11661-003-0103-310.1007/s11661-003-0103-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.04210.1016/j.actamat.2004.06.042 ↗
10. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.266110.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.2661 ↗
11. Modeling of microstructure evolution during the thermomechanical processing of titanium alloys
12. 10.1007/s11661-011-1018-z10.1007/s11661-011-1018-z ↗
13. 10.1121/1.324503210.1121/1.3245032 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11661-018-4716-y10.1007/s11661-018-4716-y ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.04310.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.043 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11661-005-0229-610.1007/s11661-005-0229-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.12.03510.1016/j.msea.2008.12.035 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0031-8914(34)80244-310.1016/S0031-8914(34)80244-3 ↗
19. 10.1016/0001-6160(82)90045-110.1016/0001-6160(82)90045-1 ↗
20. Control of microstructures of (alpha + beta)-titanium alloys
21. Analysis of sharp microtexture heterogeneities in a bimodal IMI 834 billet10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.043 ↗
22. Texture in equal-channel angular pressed aluminum and nickel10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.408-412.673 ↗
23. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90130-K10.1016/0956-7151(93)90130-K ↗
24. 10.1007/BF0291471110.1007/BF02914711 ↗
25. 10.1007/s11661-011-1019-y10.1007/s11661-011-1019-y ↗
26. 10.1007/s11661-016-3351-810.1007/s11661-016-3351-8 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11661-011-0923-510.1007/s11661-011-0923-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0749-6419(01)00057-210.1016/S0749-6419(01)00057-2 ↗
29. 10.1007/s11661-002-0340-x10.1007/s11661-002-0340-x ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0264499110.1007/BF02644991 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.06310.1016/j.msea.2016.08.063 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01155-110.1016/S0921-5093(98)01155-1 ↗