journal article·2022-05-28

The discrepancy between the indentation curves obtained by the finite element method calculation with a Berkovich and a conical indenter

Jaroslav Kovář, Vladimír Fuis, Radim Čtvrtlík, Jan Tomáštík

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 37· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Nanoindentation is an experimental technique used for the determination of Young modulus. The commonly used Oliver-Pharr analysis based on the assumption of the equivalence of indentation curves obtained with a Berkovich and a conical indenter is employed. Nevertheless, a break-down of this equivalence in projected area between the pyramidal and conical geometry was found.This discrepancy leads to an overestimation of Young modulus and needs to be corrected with coefficient beta. It corrects the difference between Young modulus from the conical and the Berkovich indentation but cannot correct the indentation curves. This paper aims at the FEM study of modelling of the nanoindentation test, the influence of the Oliver-Pharr analysis assumptions, the comparison and unification of the different values of beta for the Berkovich and the conical indentation with a rigid and a diamond indenter, the correction of the indentation curves, and the explanation of the differences between the FEM calculated and experimentally measured indentation curves.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. S.W. Moore, M.T. Manzari, Y.-L. Shen, Int J Smart Nano Mater 1, 2 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/1947541100358988910.1080/19475411003589889 ↗
2. A.M.S. Dias, G.C.D. Godoy, Mater. Sci. Forum (2010). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.636-637.118610.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.636-637.1186 ↗
3. K.-D. Bouzakis, N. Michailidis, S. Hadjiyiannis, G. Skordaris, G. Erkens, Mater. Charact. 49, 2 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00361-310.1016/S1044-5803(02)00361-3 ↗
4. T. Chudoba, P. Schwaller, R. Rabe, J.-M. Breguet, J. Michler, Philos. Mag. 86, 33–35 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/1478643060074642410.1080/14786430600746424 ↗
5. Y.J. Park, G.M. Pharr, Thin Solid Films (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(03)01102-710.1016/S0040-6090(03)01102-7 ↗
6. S. Pathak, S.R. Kalidindi, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2015.02.00110.1016/j.mser.2015.02.001 ↗
7. A.C. Fisher-Cripps, Nanoindentation (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5943-3_210.1007/978-1-4757-5943-3_2 ↗
8. Z. Shi, X. Feng, Y. Huang, J. Xiao, K.C. Hwang, Int. J. Plast. 26, 1 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2009.06.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2009.06.008 ↗
9. W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 7, 6 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
10. S. Shim, W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Int. J. Surf. Sci. Eng. 1, 2–3 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSURFSE.2007.01502810.1504/IJSURFSE.2007.015028 ↗
11. W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 19, 1 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
12. D. Torres-Torres, J. Muñoz-Saldaña, L.A. Gutierrez-Ladron-de Guevara, A. Hurtado-Macías, M.V. Swain, Model Simul. Mat. Sci. Eng. 18, 7 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/7/07500610.1088/0965-0393/18/7/075006 ↗
13. C. Shi, H. Zhao, H. Huang, L. Xu, L. Ren, M. Bai, J. Li, X. Hu, Mater. Trans. 54(6), 958–963 (2013). https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.M201240010.2320/matertrans.M2012400 ↗
14. J. Kovář, V. Fuis, J. Tomáštík, Acta Polytech. CTU Proc. (2020). https://doi.org/10.14311/APP.2020.27.013110.14311/APP.2020.27.0131 ↗
15. J. Krier, J. Breuils, L. Jacomine, H. Pelletier, J. Mater. Res. 27, 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2011.38710.1557/jmr.2011.387 ↗
16. M. Jamal, M.N. Morgan, Inventions 4, 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions403004010.3390/inventions4030040 ↗
17. G.M. Pharr, A. Bolshakov, J. Mater. Res. 17, 10 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2002.038610.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
18. K.R. Gadelrab, M. Chiesa, F.A. Bonilla, J. Mater. Res. 27, 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2011.22910.1557/jmr.2011.229 ↗
19. N.A. Sakharova, J.V. Fernandes, J.M. Antunes, M.C. Oliveira, Int. J. Solids Struct. 46, 5 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.10.03210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.10.032 ↗
20. T. Andriollo, J. Thorborg, J. Hattel, Model. Simulat. Mater. Sci. Eng. 25, 4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651X/aa683110.1088/1361-651X/aa6831 ↗
21. J.C. Hay, A. Bolshakov, G.M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 14, 6 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1999.030610.1557/JMR.1999.0306 ↗
22. Y. Tanaka, Y. Seino, K. Hattori, ACTA IMEKO 9(5), 265–269 (2020). https://doi.org/10.21014/acta_imeko.v9i5.98210.21014/acta_imeko.v9i5.982 ↗
23. T. Chudoba, N.M. Jennett, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41, 21 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/41/21/21540710.1088/0022-3727/41/21/215407 ↗
24. R.B. King, Int. J. Solids. Struct. 23, 12 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-810.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-8 ↗
25. J.J. Vlassak, W.D. Nix, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 42, 8 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(94)90033-710.1016/0022-5096(94)90033-7 ↗
26. I.N. Sneddon, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 1 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(94)90033-710.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0022-5096(94)90033-710.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
27. P.-L. Larsson, A.E. Giannakopoulos, E. Söderlund, D.J. Rowcliffe, R. Vestergaard, Int. J. Solids Struct. 33, 2 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-710.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-7 ↗
28. K.R. Gadelrab, F.A. Bonilla, M. Chiesa, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 358(2), 392–398 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.10.01110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.10.011 ↗
29. Load controlled vs displacement controlled models – which one to use in FEA? (2021). https://featips.com/
30. B. Beake, A. Harris, T. Liskiewicz, Mater. Charact. 1, 89 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1201/b19177-210.1201/b19177-2 ↗
31. Technical Glass Products, Inc. (TGP) (2021). https://technicalglass.com/technical_properties/
32. Atlas of stress-strain curves, 2nd Edition (ASM International, Materials Park OH, USA, 2002).
33. J. Kovář, V. Fuis, R. Čtvrtlík, Eng. Mech. (Brno, 2020). https://doi.org/10.21495/5896-3-29810.21495/5896-3-298 ↗