Enthalpies of formation of the solid solutions of ZrxY0.5−x/2Ta0.5−x/2O2 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.2 and 0.65 ≤ x ≤ 1)
Source abstract
Abstract
Enthalpies of formation and heat capacities are key parameters for thermodynamic assessments using the CALPHAD method and were determined in this work in the ZrO2–Y0.5Ta0.5O2quasibinary system. ZrxY0.5−x/2Ta0.5−x/2O2samples with compositions in the monoclinic and tetragonal ZrO2-based solid solutions (0.65 ≤x≤ 1) as well as the two monoclinic (M′ and M) polymorphs of the Y0.5Ta0.5O2-based solid solutions (0 ≤x≤ 0.2) were investigated. The enthalpies of the two monoclinic polymorphs M′ and M are essentially the same within experimental uncertainty and have significant energetic stability (enthalpies of formation near −45 kJ/mol) relative to their component oxides. The monoclinic and tetragonal zirconia-rich solid solutions have little energetic stability with respect to ZrO2, Ta2O5, and Y2O3and presumably owe their existence to the configurational entropy. The heat capacities of M′ and M phase are similar and can be estimated from their constituent oxides using the Neumann–Kopp rule.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02796.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02796.x ↗
2. 10.1557/JMR.2001.036110.1557/JMR.2001.0361 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.01110.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.11.011 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.05.04610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.05.046 ↗
5. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04302.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb04302.x ↗
6. 1981
7. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.09.00910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.09.009 ↗
8. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04531.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04531.x ↗
9. 10.1134/S002016851611014510.1134/S0020168516110145 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04862.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04862.x ↗
11. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-010917-10500010.1146/annurev-matsci-010917-105000 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb08262.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb08262.x ↗
13. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.15110.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.08.151 ↗
14. 10.3139/146.10153910.3139/146.101539 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.cossms.2004.03.00910.1016/j.cossms.2004.03.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.calphad.2004.09.00210.1016/j.calphad.2004.09.002 ↗
17. 10.1557/mrs.2012.23210.1557/mrs.2012.232 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.02410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.024 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.12.00310.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.12.003 ↗
20. 1970
21. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.04.00210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.04.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.03.01210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.03.012 ↗
23. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08049.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08049.x ↗
24. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1964.tb15654.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1964.tb15654.x ↗
25. 10.1107/S0365110X6700409810.1107/S0365110X67004098 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.mtla.2018.11.00610.1016/j.mtla.2018.11.006 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.09410210.1103/PhysRevB.90.094102 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.05410.1016/j.actamat.2014.01.054 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.19410.1016/j.ceramint.2016.05.194 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2018 · 2
31. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05404.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb05404.x ↗
32. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.03.01310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.03.013 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00269005003510.1007/s002690050035 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.01010.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.06.010 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0030752610.1007/BF00307526 ↗
36. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2017 · 37
37. 10.1351/pac20067807145510.1351/pac200678071455 ↗
38. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00295-010.1016/S1359-6454(00)00295-0 ↗
39. 10.1107/S002188981300353110.1107/S0021889813003531 ↗
40. 10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00393-610.1016/S0257-8972(02)00393-6 ↗
41. 1979
42. 10.1016/0257-8972(87)90119-810.1016/0257-8972(87)90119-8 ↗
43. 1998
44. 10.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.04010.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.040 ↗