journal article·2019-01-28

Influence of the deformation heating on the flow behavior of 6063 alloy during compression at medium strain rates

Shikang Li, Luoxing Li, Hong He, Guan Wang

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 34· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

The flow softening behavior caused by deformation heating of the 6063 aluminum alloy was investigated employing uniaxial compression tests. The adiabatic correction factor (η) and mechanical work partitioning factor (φ), commonly considered to be constant, were found to be highly variable at medium strain rates, namely from 0.01 to 10 s−1. η decreased with increasing strain and decreasing strain rate, but it was relatively not sensitive to temperature. φ, traditionally taken to be a constant of 0–10%, was found to vary from 2.8% at a temperature of 623 K and a strain rate of 10 s−1to 26.8% at a temperature of 773 K with a strain rate of 0.01 s−1. An expression for temperature rise involving these two variable factors was optimized. FEM simulation using the corrected and uncorrected true stress–strain curves and corresponding extrusion experiment were carried out. Comparisons between the simulated and experimental results confirmed the temperature compensation was trustable.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.05610.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.056 ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0264776510.1007/BF02647765 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.02910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.029 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.01.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.01.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2017.01.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2017.01.001 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.10.06410.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.10.064 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.10.12010.1016/j.msea.2011.10.120 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0966-9795(00)00041-810.1016/S0966-9795(00)00041-8 ↗
9. 10.1557/jmr.2015.16810.1557/jmr.2015.168 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.01810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.05.018 ↗
11. 10.1361/10599490177034459310.1361/105994901770344593 ↗
12. 10.1007/BF0264379710.1007/BF02643797 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.10.01910.1016/j.msea.2011.10.019 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.00410.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matchar.2006.04.01210.1016/j.matchar.2006.04.012 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.17710.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.177 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.02310.1016/j.matdes.2016.06.023 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.04210.1016/j.msea.2009.03.042 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.32210.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.322 ↗
20. Microstructure characteristics and constitutive modeling for elevated temperature flow behavior of Al–Cu–Li X2A66 alloy
21. 10.1007/BF0264592010.1007/BF02645920 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.09.01110.1016/j.msea.2016.09.011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.08810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.09.088 ↗
24. 10.1007/BF0267557110.1007/BF02675571 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.09810.1016/j.msea.2004.02.098 ↗
26. 10.1557/jmr.2017.7710.1557/jmr.2017.77 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.04.00610.1016/j.jmst.2016.04.006 ↗
28. 10.1533/9781845690144.6410.1533/9781845690144.64 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.021 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.01.07510.1016/j.msea.2013.01.075 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.11.04610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.11.046 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.11.00310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2013.11.003 ↗
33. Microstructural characterization and investigation of thermal conductivity behaviour of Al6061–SiC–Gr hybrid metal matrix composites
34. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.02710.1016/j.msea.2016.03.027 ↗