Effects of austenitic and duplex electrodes on microstructure, mechanical properties, pitting, and galvanic corrosion resistance of ferritic and dual-phase stainless steel dissimilar joints
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, examination of joint properties of ferritic and dual-phase stainless steel dissimilar welds was carried out by using E2209 duplex and E309LMo austenitic electrodes. The results of E2209 weld showed dual-phase microstructure of ferrite and austenite in the form of grain boundary austenite, Widmanstatten and intragranular austenite, whereas E309LMo weld showed acicular ferrite in the cores of subgrain of austenite. Electron backscatter diffraction was used to study the evolution of the microstructure and micro-texture. The significant variations in the feature of weldments illustrated the presence of a very strong texture. Ferritoscope measurement revealed higher ferrite content in the E2209 weld. Tensile strength, hardness, and absorbed energy of weld metal were dominated by E2209 weld. The modified Strauss test indicated intergranular corrosion attack in the AISI 430 ferritic side heat affected zone. Higher pitting resistance showed by E2209 weld than E309LMo weld. While higher galvanic corrosion observed in the E309LMo weld and AISI 430 ferritic base metal couple.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12666-016-0878-810.1007/s12666-016-0878-8 ↗
2. 10.1007/s13632-015-0236-y10.1007/s13632-015-0236-y ↗
3. 2008
4. 10.1007/s00170-005-0285-510.1007/s00170-005-0285-5 ↗
5. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. · 2009 · 16 · 6216
6. 10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00643-910.1016/S0921-5093(03)00643-9 ↗
7. 10.1007/s11665-014-1136-z10.1007/s11665-014-1136-z ↗
8. 10.1557/jmr.2012.9910.1557/jmr.2012.99 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11665-016-2329-410.1007/s11665-016-2329-4 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.06310.1016/j.matdes.2011.11.063 ↗
11. 10.2355/isijinternational.47.35910.2355/isijinternational.47.359 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11665-015-1597-810.1007/s11665-015-1597-8 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matchar.2015.05.03610.1016/j.matchar.2015.05.036 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.corsci.2011.07.02210.1016/j.corsci.2011.07.022 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.01.04710.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.01.047 ↗
16. 10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60066-810.1016/S1005-0302(12)60066-8 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.06010.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.12.060 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.08210.1016/j.msea.2016.04.082 ↗
19. 2005
20. 10.1557/jmr.2016.45710.1557/jmr.2016.457 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.03.03510.1016/j.corsci.2007.03.035 ↗
22. 10.5006/0010-9312-28.9.32110.5006/0010-9312-28.9.321 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.10.03410.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.10.034 ↗
24. 10.2320/matertrans.M201532110.2320/matertrans.M2015321 ↗
25. 10.1557/jmr.2015.27610.1557/jmr.2015.276 ↗
26. J. Mater. Phys. Chem. · 2013 · 1 · 65
27. Wear · 2012 · 41 · 292
28. J. Manuf. Process. · 2017 · 25 · 124
29. 10.1007/BF0271545210.1007/BF02715452 ↗