Virtual machine concept applied to uncertainties estimation in instrumented indentation testing
Source abstract
Abstract
The basis of the virtual machine concept, which is commonly used in coordinate measuring machines, was implemented to determine more realistic uncertainties on the estimation of the elastic modulus obtained from nanoindentation tests. The methodology is based on a mathematical model applied to simulate the testing process and to evaluate the uncertainties through Monte Carlo simulations whose application depends on the studied system (instrument, material, scale, etc.). The methodology was applied to the study of fused silica (FQ) and steel samples tested in a nanoindentation system. The results revealed that the most relevant sources of uncertainty are related to the calibration procedure, particularly to the elastic modulus of the calibration material, and to the contact depth estimation; however, the relevance of the uncertainties is system dependent. This work represents a first insight for a deeper consideration of the uncertainties in instrumented indentation testing.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.11.00810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2014.11.008 ↗
2. 10.1557/PROC-522-10110.1557/PROC-522-101 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.01.02010.1016/j.msea.2008.01.020 ↗
4. 10.1557/jmr.2006.037010.1557/jmr.2006.0370 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10853-017-0961-510.1007/s10853-017-0961-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.10.01110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.10.011 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01341-410.1016/S0040-6090(01)01341-4 ↗
8. 10.1088/0026-1394/51/4/S17610.1088/0026-1394/51/4/S176 ↗
9. 10.3139/146.10116810.3139/146.101168 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.micron.2011.07.01610.1016/j.micron.2011.07.016 ↗
11. 10.1051/mattech/201700710.1051/mattech/2017007 ↗
12. 10.1088/0957-0233/25/12/12500810.1088/0957-0233/25/12/125008 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat313410.1038/nmat3134 ↗
14. 10.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-810.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-8 ↗
15. 10.1080/0141861960823970710.1080/01418619608239707 ↗
16. 10.1016/0025-5408(92)90005-K10.1016/0025-5408(92)90005-K ↗
17. 40. Nano Indenters: Application note from micro star technologies, 2009. Available at: https://www.microstartech.com/ (accessed October 11, 2018).
18. 39. Capacitive Displacement Sensors-Nanometrology Solutions: Application note from Physik Instrumente (PI), 2007. Available at: http://www.capacitance-sensors.com/pdf/Cap_Sens_Web_PI_Capacitive_Displacement_Nanometrology_Capacitance_Gauge_Sensor_E.pdf (accessed October 14, 2018).
19. 10.1016/j.measurement.2010.04.00510.1016/j.measurement.2010.04.005 ↗
20. Hogan · 2017
21. 10.1002/adem.20080025310.1002/adem.200800253 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-1-4419-9872-9_210.1007/978-1-4419-9872-9_2 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.00910.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.009 ↗
24. 10.1088/0957-0233/16/11/00710.1088/0957-0233/16/11/007 ↗
25. Germak · 2009
26. 10.6028/jres.100.04110.6028/jres.100.041 ↗
27. 37. Manual of the Nano Indenter® XP, MTS Systems Corporation.
28. 28. ISO 14577-2:2015: Metallic materials—Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters—Part 2: Verification and calibration of testing machines.
29. Pratt · 2003
30. 10.1063/1.274682310.1063/1.2746823 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.measurement.2009.09.00510.1016/j.measurement.2009.09.005 ↗
32. 10.1088/0957-0233/16/11/00210.1088/0957-0233/16/11/002 ↗
33. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
34. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
35. 19. JCGM 101:2008: Supplement 1 to the ‘guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement’-propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Available at: http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html (accessed February 27, 2017).
36. 10.1016/S0141-6359(03)00035-710.1016/S0141-6359(03)00035-7 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.05.00210.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.05.002 ↗
38. 14. ISO/TS 15530-1:2013: Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—Coordinate measuring machines (CMM): Technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement—Part 1: Overview and metrological characteristics.
39. 10.1088/0957-0233/22/9/09400410.1088/0957-0233/22/9/094004 ↗
40. 10.1088/1361-6501/28/3/03400710.1088/1361-6501/28/3/034007 ↗
41. 5. BIPM—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). Available at: https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html (accessed April 06, 2018).
42. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.03010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.07.030 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.115071510.1063/1.1150715 ↗
44. 10.1088/0022-3727/41/7/07402710.1088/0022-3727/41/7/074027 ↗
45. 10.1088/0026-1394/47/2/S0610.1088/0026-1394/47/2/S06 ↗
46. 10.1002/sca.2122010.1002/sca.21220 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.measurement.2011.02.01110.1016/j.measurement.2011.02.011 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.09.00610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.09.006 ↗
49. 10.1007/978-94-011-1765-4_2810.1007/978-94-011-1765-4_28 ↗
50. 10.1557/JMR.2002.038610.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
51. Smith · 2007
52. Menčík · 2012
53. 47. ISO 14577-1:2015: Metallic materials—Instrumented indentation test for hardness and materials parameters—Part 1: Test method.
54. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2012.00846.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2012.00846.x ↗
55. Trenk · 2004
56. 10.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.02710.1016/j.measurement.2016.12.027 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.06710.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.067 ↗
58. 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01367-510.1016/S0040-6090(00)01367-5 ↗
59. Modelling of the coordinate measuring systems accuracy
60. Summerhays · 2004
61. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.02.02010.1016/j.measurement.2012.02.020 ↗
62. Ullner · 2004
63. 10.1557/jmr.2017.12010.1557/jmr.2017.120 ↗
64. 10.1557/JMR.1998.014610.1557/JMR.1998.0146 ↗
65. 10.1557/JMR.1995.149110.1557/JMR.1995.1491 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.08.02610.1016/j.measurement.2012.08.026 ↗