Identifying rhenium substitute candidate multiprincipal-element alloys from electronic structure and thermodynamic criteria
Source abstract
Abstract
While rhenium has proven to be an ideal material in fast-cycling high-temperature applications such as rocket nozzles, its prohibitive cost limits its continued use and motivates a search for viable cost-effective substitutes. We show that a simple design principle that trades off average valence electron count and cost considerations proves helpful in identifying a promising pool of candidate substitute alloys: The Mo–Ru–Ta–W quaternary system. We demonstrate how this picture can be combined with a computational thermodynamic model of phase stability, based on high-throughput ab initio calculations, to further narrow down the search and deliver alloys that maintain rhenium’s desirable hcp crystal structure. This thermodynamic model is validated with comparisons to known binary phase diagram sections and corroborated by experimental synthesis and structural characterization demonstrating multiprinciple-element hcp solid-solution samples selected from a promising composition range.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Metallurgical and Alloy Processes · Semiconductor materials and interfaces
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01481-X10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01481-X ↗
2. 10.1080/1042691940893497710.1080/10426919408934977 ↗
3. 10.1016/0001-6160(86)90079-910.1016/0001-6160(86)90079-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.calphad.2013.06.00610.1016/j.calphad.2013.06.006 ↗
5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.35310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 ↗
6. Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. · 1981 · 36 · 51
7. Fazovye Ravnovesiya Met. Splavakh · 1981 · 266
8. 1990 · 3269
9. J. Phase Equilib. · 1991 · 12 · 395
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.02510.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.025 ↗
11. Am. J. Condens. Matter. Phys. · 2013 · 3 · 1
12. 10.1021/ja109167210.1021/ja1091672 ↗
13. 1990 · 2656
14. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.08.04510.1016/j.commatsci.2016.08.045 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01192-010.1016/S0925-8388(00)01192-0 ↗
16. 1990 · 3438
17. 10.1186/s40192-014-0029-110.1186/s40192-014-0029-1 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.intermet.2009.02.00410.1016/j.intermet.2009.02.004 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.calphad.2018.04.00310.1016/j.calphad.2018.04.003 ↗
20. 1990 · 2671
21. 10.1016/j.calphad.2008.08.00410.1016/j.calphad.2008.08.004 ↗
22. 1990 · 59
23. 10.1103/RevModPhys.74.1110.1103/RevModPhys.74.11 ↗
24. 1990 · 84
25. 10.1016/S0364-5916(02)80006-210.1016/S0364-5916(02)80006-2 ↗
26. 10.3139/146.11020710.3139/146.110207 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.calphad.2008.12.00510.1016/j.calphad.2008.12.005 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.22411610.1103/PhysRevB.83.224116 ↗
29. 10.1361/10549710277033159610.1361/105497102770331596 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.14411310.1103/PhysRevB.95.144113 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.01610.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.016 ↗
33. 10.1038/ncomms855910.1038/ncomms8559 ↗
34. 10.1080/0141159070122856210.1080/01411590701228562 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1622310.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.40.361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.162110.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1621 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.06550110.1103/PhysRevLett.115.065501 ↗
40. Phys. Rev. B · 1999 · 59 · 1758
41. 1995
42. 1992
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.calphad.2017.05.00510.1016/j.calphad.2017.05.005 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.calphad.2017.10.00810.1016/j.calphad.2017.10.008 ↗
46. Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2010 · 45 · 95
47. 10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N ↗
48. JOM · 2010 · 62 · 55
49. JOM · 1997 · 49 · 14
50. 10.1016/0022-5088(59)90025-610.1016/0022-5088(59)90025-6 ↗