Numerical modeling of centerline segregation by a combined 3-D and 2-D hybrid model during slab continuous casting
Source abstract
Abstract
Centerline segregation is one of the typical internal defects, which occurs during slab continuous casting (CC). To investigate and predict the centerline segregation encountered in a continuously cast slab, a combined 3-D and 2-D hybrid simulation model for centerline segregation was developed. The average deviation between the calculated and experimented results reaches as low as 0.5%, which demonstrates that the hybrid simulation model has relatively high reliability. The centerline segregation of the slab was predicted accurately. The results show that macrosegregation occurring during the slab CC process has heredity. In the casting direction, the concentration of solutes in the liquid pool increases gradually until the casting has solidified completely. After complete solidification, the solutes’ concentration maintains an almost constant value. On the centerline, the maximum segregation degree occurs at a position roughly 614 mm from the slab center. The maximum centerline segregation degrees of C, Si, Mn, P, and S solutes are 1.163, 1.058, 1.045, 1.111, and 1.165, respectively.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Iron and Steelmaking Processes · Materials Engineering and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1504/IJMPT.2013.05895610.1504/IJMPT.2013.058956 ↗
2. Vušanović · 2011 · 1
3. 10.1179/1743281211Y.000000008810.1179/1743281211Y.0000000088 ↗
4. Centerline segregation in continuous casting billets
5. 10.1016/0017-9310(87)90094-910.1016/0017-9310(87)90094-9 ↗
6. 10.1007/s11661-001-0152-410.1007/s11661-001-0152-4 ↗
7. Morphology and segregation in continuously cast high carbon steel billets10.2355/isijinternational.47.1759 ↗
8. Macrosegregation. Part 1
9. 10.1007/s11663-013-9986-610.1007/s11663-013-9986-6 ↗
10. 10.1002/srin.20140001510.1002/srin.201400015 ↗
11. 10.2355/isijinternational1966.24.87310.2355/isijinternational1966.24.873 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.12.03010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.12.030 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0265171910.1007/BF02651719 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11661-013-2060-910.1007/s11661-013-2060-9 ↗
15. 10.1002/srin.20100012210.1002/srin.201000122 ↗
16. 10.1002/nme.166410.1002/nme.1664 ↗
17. Macrosegregation. Part 2
18. 10.1007/BF0290023310.1007/BF02900233 ↗
19. 10.1007/s11661-013-1761-410.1007/s11661-013-1761-4 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11837-016-2023-x10.1007/s11837-016-2023-x ↗
21. 10.1179/1743133612Y.000000004710.1179/1743133612Y.0000000047 ↗
22. 10.1016/S1006-7191(08)60094-010.1016/S1006-7191(08)60094-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.08.02010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.08.020 ↗
24. 10.1007/s11663-010-9441-x10.1007/s11663-010-9441-x ↗
25. 10.1002/srin.20110008510.1002/srin.201100085 ↗
26. 10.1007/s11663-998-0058-210.1007/s11663-998-0058-2 ↗
27. Vertnik · 2011 · 1
28. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.08.07910.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.08.079 ↗
29. 10.3390/met708028810.3390/met7080288 ↗
30. 10.1007/s11663-003-0040-y10.1007/s11663-003-0040-y ↗
31. 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-210.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2 ↗