Brittle Flexural Failures in Reinforced Concrete Frame Structural Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Invalid Email Address
Only a short abstract or summary was supplied by the source.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: short
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Structural Integrity and Reliability Analysis · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Eurocode 2 Part 1-1 (EN 1992-1-1), “Design of Concrete Structures—General Rules and Rules for Buildings,” CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
2. Eurocode 2 Part 2 (EN 1992-2), “Design of Concrete Structures—Concrete Bridges – Design and Detailing Rules,” CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels, Belgium, 2005.
3. Campione, G.; Monaco, A.; and Minafò, G., “Shear Strength of High-Strength Concrete Beams: Modeling and Design Recommendations,” Engineering Structures, V. 69, 2014, pp. 116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.02910.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.029 ↗
4. Sangiorgio, F.; Silfwerbrand, J.; and Mancini, G., “Resistance and Sub-Resistances of RC Beams Subjected to Multiple Failure Modes, “World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index 98, International Journal of Civil, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, V. 9, No. 2, 2015, pp. 145-153.
5. Sangiorgio, F., and Silfwerbrand, J., “Ultimate Load Behaviour of RC Structural Systems Designed According to Eurocodes,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 142, No. 10, 2016, p. 04016068 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000152110.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001521 ↗
6. Eurocode 1 Part 1-1 (EN 1991-1-1), “Actions on Structures—Part 1-1: General Actions - Densities, Self-Weight, Imposed Loads for Buildings,” CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
7. Eurocode 0 (EN 1990), “Basis of Structural Design,” CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
8. Eurocode 8, Part 1 (EN 1998-1), “Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance—Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings,” CEN (European Committee for Standardization), Brussels, Belgium, 1998.
9. Sargin, M., “Stress-Strain Relationships for Concrete and the Analysis of Structural Concrete Sections,” University of Waterloo, Solid Mechanics Division, SM Study, V. 4, 1971, pp. 23-46.
10. Massicotte, B.; Elwi, A. E.; and MacGregor, J. G., “Tension-Stiffening Model for Planar Reinforced Concrete Members,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 116, No. 11, 1990, pp. 3039-3058. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:11(3039)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:11(3039) ↗
11. Collins, M. P.; Mitchell, D.; Adebar, P.; and Vecchio, F. J., “A General Shear Design Method,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1996, pp. 36-45.10.14359/9838 ↗
12. Vecchio, F. J., and Collins, M. P., “The Modified Compression-Field Theory for Reinforced Concrete Elements Subjected to Shear,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 83, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1986, pp. 219-231.10.14359/10416 ↗
13. Probabilistic Model Code, “Part 3: Material Properties,” Joint Committee on Structural Safety (JCSS), Internet Publication, www.jcss.ethz.ch, 2002.
14. McKay, M. D.; Conover, W. J.; and Beckman, R. J., “A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code,” Technometrics, V. 21, No. 2, 1979, pp. 239-245.10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755 ↗
15. Florian, A., “An Efficient Sampling Scheme: Updated Latin Hypercube Sampling,” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, V. 7, No. 2, 1992, pp. 123-130. doi: 10.1016/0266-8920(92)90015-A10.1016/0266-8920(92)90015-A ↗
16. Loh, W. L., “On Latin Hypercube Sampling,” Annals of Statistics, V. 24, No. 5, 1996, pp. 2058-2080. doi: 10.1214/aos/106936231010.1214/aos/1069362310 ↗
17. Novák, D.; Teplý, B.; and Keršner, Z., “The Role of Latin Hypercube Sampling Method in Reliability Engineering,” Proceedings of ICOSSAR, V. 97, 1998, pp. 403-409.
18. Olsson, A.; Sandberg, G.; and Dahlblom, O., “On Latin Hypercube Sampling for Structural Reliability Analysis,” Structural Safety, V. 25, No. 1, 2003, pp. 47-68. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00039-510.1016/S0167-4730(02)00039-5 ↗
19. Liu, X. L.; Chen, Y. W.; Jing, X. R.; and Chen, Y. G., “Optimized Latin Hypercube Sampling Method and Its Application,” Guofang Ke-ji Daxue Xuebao, V. 33, No. 5, 2011, pp. 73-77.
20. Shields, M. D., and Zhang, J., “The Generalization of Latin Hypercube Sampling,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, V. 148, 2016, pp. 96-108. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.00210.1016/j.ress.2015.12.002 ↗
21. Von Mises, R., Probability, Statistics, and Truth, Courier Corporation, 1957.
22. Reynolds, H. T., The Analysis of Cross-Classifications, Free Press, New York, 1977.
23. Utts, J. M., Seeing through Statistics, Cengage Learning, 2014.
24. Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G., Statistical Methods, eighth edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, 1989.
25. Khanna, O. S.; Mufti, A. A.; and Bakht, B., “Experimental Investigation of the Role of Reinforcement in the Strength of Concrete Deck Slabs,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 27, No. 3, 2000, pp. 475-480. doi: 10.1139/l99-09410.1139/l99-094 ↗
26. Zhou, C., and Kou, X., “Determination of Partial Safety Coefficients of Structural Reliability Based on Contaminated Distribution,” Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), V. 15, No. 3, 2010, pp. 285-290. doi: 10.1007/s12204-010-1004-410.1007/s12204-010-1004-4 ↗
27. Mitchell, D.; Abrishami, H. H.; and Mindess, S., “The Effect of Steel Fibers and Epoxy-Coated Reinforcement on Tension Stiffening and Cracking of Reinforced Concrete,” ACI Materials Journal, V. 93, No. 1, Jan.-Feb. 1996, pp. 61-68.10.14359/9797 ↗
28. Lin, C. H., and Chien, Y. M., “Effect of Section Ductility on Moment Redistribution of Continuous Concrete Beams,” Zhongguo Gongcheng Xuekan, V. 23, No. 2, 2000, pp. 131-141. doi: 10.1080/02533839.2000.967053110.1080/02533839.2000.9670531 ↗
29. Do Carmo, R. N., and Lopes, S. M., “Ductility and Linear Analysis wth Moment Redistribution in Reinforced High-Strength Concrete Beams,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, V. 32, No. 1, 2005, pp. 194-203. doi: 10.1139/l04-08010.1139/l04-080 ↗
30. Scott, R. H., and Whittle, R. T., “Moment Redistribution Effects in Beams,” Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 57, No. 1, 2005, pp. 9-20. doi: 10.1680/macr.2005.57.1.910.1680/macr.57.1.9.57870 ↗
31. Taerwe, L., and Matthys, S., fib Model Code for Concrete Structures 2010, Ernst & Sohn, Wiley, 2013.
32. Lou, T.; Lopes, S. M.; and Lopes, A. V., “Evaluation of Moment Redistribution in Normal-Strength and High-Strength Reinforced Concrete Beams,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 140, No. 10, 2014, p. 04014072 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000099410.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000994 ↗
33. Henriques, A. A.; Calheiros, F.; and Figueiras, J. A., “Safety Format for the Design of Concrete Frames,” Engineering Computations, V. 19, No. 3, 2002, pp. 346-363. doi: 10.1108/0264440021042398110.1108/02644400210423981 ↗