journal article·2019-07-28

Theoretical study on Sn–Sb-based lead-free solder by ab initio molecular dynamics simulation

Ye Yuan, Xiumin Chen, Zhiqiang Zhou, Yifu Li, Baoqiang Xu, Dachun Liu, Bin Yang

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 34· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Sn–Sb alloy is an ideal candidate for lead-free solder; however, its performance has been inferior to that of Sn–Pb alloy. Here, the authors used ab initio molecular dynamics simulation to investigate the interatomic interaction in Sn–Sb-based lead-free solders. By calculating the electron density distribution, bond population, and partial density of states, the authors found that the Sn–Sb bonds are a mixture of nonlocalized metal and localized covalent bonds. The covalent bond between Sn and Sb is easy to break at higher temperatures, so Sn–Sb (6.4 wt%) had better fluidity than other studied Sn–Sb alloys. Furthermore, adding Cu or Ag into Sn–Sb alloys can decrease the strength of covalent bonds and stabilize the metal bonds, which improves the metallicity and wettability of the Sn–Sb–Cu and Sn–Sb–Cu–Ag systems when the temperature increases. These results are all in good agreement with experimental findings and have significant value for the development of new solder alloys.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Contrast performance analysis between lead-free and tin–lead alloys
2. 10.1016/S0169-4332(03)00342-810.1016/S0169-4332(03)00342-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.susc.2010.10.02610.1016/j.susc.2010.10.026 ↗
4. Garner
5. Li · 2009
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.11.00110.1016/j.msea.2010.11.001 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.03.09310.1016/j.msea.2012.03.093 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.18010.1016/j.jallcom.2010.06.180 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.10.18610.1016/j.jallcom.2010.10.186 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2014.07.01310.1016/j.vacuum.2014.07.013 ↗
11. General situation of development of lead-free solder
12. 10.1016/j.jtice.2017.03.03510.1016/j.jtice.2017.03.035 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.tca.2011.02.03210.1016/j.tca.2011.02.032 ↗
14. 10.1007/s11661-005-0142-z10.1007/s11661-005-0142-z ↗
15. Sn–Ag, Sn–Zn, and Sn–Bi lead-free solder
16. 10.1016/j.jct.2015.12.00710.1016/j.jct.2015.12.007 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.10910.1016/j.jallcom.2011.01.109 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.04.00810.1016/j.msea.2011.04.008 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tca.2011.03.00310.1016/j.tca.2011.03.003 ↗
20. Effect of rare earth addition on shear strength of SnAgCu lead-free solder joints
21. First-principles simulation: Ideas, illustrations and the CASTEP code
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1631710.1103/PhysRevB.54.16317 ↗
23. Molecular dynamics simulation of wetting behaviors of Li on W surfaces
24. 10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63730-X10.1016/S1003-6326(15)63730-X ↗
25. 10.1007/s11664-006-0303-x10.1007/s11664-006-0303-x ↗
26. 10.1007/s11664-015-4197-310.1007/s11664-015-4197-3 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.02110.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.021 ↗
28. Chen · 2008
29. 10.1557/JMR.1999.052710.1557/JMR.1999.0527 ↗
30. Dong · 2013
31. 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.16510.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.165 ↗
32. 10.1038/1741011a010.1038/1741011a0 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.89110.1103/PhysRevLett.80.891 ↗
34. 10.1080/00268979617391210.1080/002689796173912 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.tsf.2004.05.06310.1016/j.tsf.2004.05.063 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.tca.2014.05.00910.1016/j.tca.2014.05.009 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.09.10310.1016/j.msea.2011.09.103 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.08810.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.088 ↗