journal article·1991-08

Effect of oxygen on the formation of end-of-range disorder in implantation amorphized silicon

E. Lorenz, J. Gyulai, L. Frey, H. Ryssel, N.Q. Khanh

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 6· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Formation of End-of-Range (EOR) disorder was studied in (100)-oriented silicon, when subjected to amorphization by implantation of Ge+ ions, followed by a 10 s Rapid Thermal Annealing (RTA) at 1050 °C. XTEM, RBS/channeling, and SIMS were used to analyze Czochralski grown (CZ) silicon wafers with oxygen concentrations of 6.5, 7.0, and 8.0 × 1017/cm3 and Float Zone (FZ) silicon, as “low oxygen” wafers. Amorphization on neighboring parts of the 4″ wafers was made either by 60 keV Ge+ implantation or by 110 keV Ge+ implantation and by sequential (60 keV + 110 keV) Ge+ implantation. Parts of each wafer were additionally implanted with 13 keV boron. In FZ silicon, no defects were found for 60 keV Ge+ implantation and RTA at 1050 °C. For 110 keV Ge+ and sequential (60 keV + 110 keV) Ge+ implantation in FZ-silicon the majority of the samples showed perfect annealing. Two wafers, however, subjected to sequential implantation still contained defects but with a defect density that was one order of magnitude lower than for CZ wafers. For one of them, not even a continuous layer of defects was formed. In contrast, CZ wafers contained defect bands, except for the 60 keV Ge+ implantation [in accord with the findings of Ozturk et al., IEEE Trans. on Electronic Dev. 35, 659 (1988)]. The presence of boron had no visible effect on the defect structure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Silicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.32340810.1063/1.323408 ↗
2. 10. Fair R. B. and Ruggles G. A. , Solid State Technol., 107 (May 1990).
3. 10.1063/1.9738210.1063/1.97382 ↗
4. 10.1109/16.251010.1109/16.2510 ↗
5. 10.1016/0168-583X(89)90293-010.1016/0168-583X(89)90293-0 ↗
6. Müller · 1971
7. 10.1016/0168-583X(85)90562-210.1016/0168-583X(85)90562-2 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.9510610.1063/1.95106 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.10149110.1063/1.101491 ↗
10. Maher · 1986 · 52 · 93
11. 10.1063/1.33802610.1063/1.338026 ↗
12. Pichler · 1989 · 173
13. Ganin · 1987 · 74 · 717
14. 10.1016/0168-583X(89)90206-110.1016/0168-583X(89)90206-1 ↗