journal article·2019-02-28

In vitro evaluation of a novel multiwalled carbon nanotube/nanohydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone composite for bone tissue engineering

Huixiao Yang, Jieqing Li, Qiong Liao, Hua Guo, Huishan Chen, Yuting Zhu, Meijuan Cai, Huling Lv

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 34· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, a three-phased multiwalled scaffold, composed of carbon nanotube (mwCNT), nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nHA), and polycaprolactone (PCL), was fabricated by the solvent evaporation technique. The structure character, mechanical properties, and degradation activity in simulated body fluid (SBF), along with osteoproductive ability in human osteosarcoma cell MG63, were investigated thoroughly. Results showed that the three phases in mwCNT/nHA/PCL composite presented excellent miscibility and stronger interfacial force when the weight content was 1/15/84 (wt%). Simultaneously, the composite had smaller porosity and slower degradation rate, and there was massive crystallized hydroxyapatite formed on the surface after being soaked in SBF. With regard to bioactivity, MG63s on this scaffolds presented good proliferation performance and differentiated into the osteogenic lineage by expressing high levels of ALP. It was concluded that mwCNTs/nHA/PCL composite scaffolds might be beneficial for bone tissue engineering at a relatively low concentration of mwCNTs and nHA.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (58)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10266-008-0087-y10.1007/s10266-008-0087-y ↗
2. 10.1016/j.bone.2012.07.02610.1016/j.bone.2012.07.026 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.01710.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017 ↗
4. Alkaline degradation study of linear and network poly(ε-caprolactone)
5. 10.1016/S0169-409X(98)00023-410.1016/S0169-409X(98)00023-4 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.01.01110.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.01.011 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.11410.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.114 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.02310.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.08.023 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2003.08.00910.1016/j.mechmat.2003.08.009 ↗
10. 10.1002/elps.115006090510.1002/elps.1150060905 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-210.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2 ↗
12. 10.1166/jbt.2017.162910.1166/jbt.2017.1629 ↗
13. An overview of colorimetric assay methods used to assess survival or proliferation of mammalian cells
14. 10.1089/zeb.2007.050810.1089/zeb.2007.0508 ↗
15. 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.004510.1089/ten.tea.2010.0045 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10853-007-2362-710.1007/s10853-007-2362-7 ↗
17. 10.1002/jbm.b.3343210.1002/jbm.b.33432 ↗
18. 10.1021/bm005631010.1021/bm0056310 ↗
19. 10.1002/jbm.a.3447010.1002/jbm.a.34470 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.03.00710.1016/j.actbio.2007.03.007 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.05010.1016/j.msec.2015.09.050 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msec.2012.12.03910.1016/j.msec.2012.12.039 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10439-012-0728-810.1007/s10439-012-0728-8 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.01.00610.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.01.006 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.04910.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.049 ↗
27. 10.1021/cr050569o10.1021/cr050569o ↗
28. 10.1080/00222348.2010.54943710.1080/00222348.2010.549437 ↗
29. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00230-010.1016/S0266-3538(02)00230-0 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.00710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.06.007 ↗
31. 10.1038/nmat142110.1038/nmat1421 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.16010.1016/j.wneu.2017.11.160 ↗
33. 10.1097/00001665-200311000-0000210.1097/00001665-200311000-00002 ↗
34. 10.1080/13645700232017417710.1080/136457002320174177 ↗
35. In vitro assessment of the biological response to nano-sized hydroxyapatite
36. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.03810.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.038 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.153311810.1063/1.1533118 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.03.02310.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.03.023 ↗
39. 10.1021/la305077910.1021/la3050779 ↗
40. 10.1166/jbn.2014.174910.1166/jbn.2014.1749 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.00610.1016/j.msec.2006.05.006 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00305-710.1016/S0032-3861(03)00305-7 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00044-910.1016/S0142-9612(03)00044-9 ↗
44. 10.1002/jcp.2010910.1002/jcp.20109 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.07.00310.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.07.003 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.12.01610.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.12.016 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.09.021 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.01410.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.014 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00042-910.1016/S0142-9612(00)00042-9 ↗
51. 10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/03410810.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034108 ↗
52. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering
53. 10.1002/jbm.b.3067110.1002/jbm.b.30671 ↗
54. Biomimetic three-dimensional nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite and magnetically synthesized single-walled carbon nanotube chitosan nanocomposite for bone regeneration
55. 10.1021/jp013745f10.1021/jp013745f ↗
56. 10.1063/1.153311810.1063/1.1533118 ↗
57. 10.4012/dmj.28.46110.4012/dmj.28.461 ↗
58. 10.1166/jnn.2008.AN2610.1166/jnn.2008.AN26 ↗