Finite element modeling of nanoindentation response of elastic fiber-matrix composites
Source abstract
Abstract
A thorough investigation of nanoindentation response of fiber/matrix composites by using a Berkovich indenter and its equivalent conical counterpart was carried out. Three-dimensional finite element models were developed to study how fiber orientations and the axial distance between the fiber and nanoindenter affect the nanoindentation response of fiber/matrix composites. This demonstrates that the indenter geometry and its orientation have little effect on the nanoindentation response when the fiber is horizontally aligned to the surface. However, when the fiber is vertically embedded in the matrix, the apparent modulus measured by using the Berkovich indenter (depending on the indenter orientation) can be significantly different from its conical counterpart. The results demonstrate that when the ratio of fiber-to-indenter distance over fiber diameter is relatively small, nanoindentation response strongly depends on fiber orientation and distance between fiber and indenter as well as indenter geometry.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Tribology and Wear Analysis · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1385/ABAB:125:3:14710.1385/ABAB:125:3:147 ↗
2. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.7310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.73 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.09.05610.1016/j.tsf.2003.09.056 ↗
4. 10.1177/002199831351304610.1177/0021998313513046 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.21010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.210 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.05510.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.055 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.07.05010.1016/j.tsf.2015.07.050 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.12.00610.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.12.006 ↗
9. Barbero · 201010.1201/9781439894132 ↗
10. 10.1017/CBO978113917013010.1017/CBO9781139170130 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.00710.1016/j.vacuum.2008.11.007 ↗
12. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00788-810.1016/S0040-6090(97)00788-8 ↗
14. 10.1088/0965-0393/14/1/00610.1088/0965-0393/14/1/006 ↗
15. 10.1088/0957-4484/23/16/16570410.1088/0957-4484/23/16/165704 ↗
16. 10.1557/JMR.1999.030810.1557/JMR.1999.0308 ↗
17. 10.1080/14786435.2015.104009710.1080/14786435.2015.1040097 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.04550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.045501 ↗
19. 10.1038/ncomms412610.1038/ncomms4126 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2278910.1002/pc.22789 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.00510.1016/j.jmps.2004.03.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.03.02710.1016/j.msec.2018.03.027 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.03910.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
24. Nanomechanical characterization of tissue engineered bone grown on titanium alloy in vitro
25. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.07610.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.076 ↗
26. 10.1557/JMR.1999.029910.1557/JMR.1999.0299 ↗
27. 10.1557/JMR.1996.009210.1557/JMR.1996.0092 ↗
28. 10.1007/978-1-61779-953-210.1007/978-1-61779-953-2 ↗
29. Matthews · 1999
30. 10.1557/jmr.2006.032310.1557/jmr.2006.0323 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00739-610.1016/S0040-6090(97)00739-6 ↗
32. 2007
33. 10.1557/jmr.2009.008610.1557/jmr.2009.0086 ↗
34. 10.1007/s11043-011-9132-210.1007/s11043-011-9132-2 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01374-810.1016/S0040-6090(01)01374-8 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.04.00310.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.04.003 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.07.03810.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.07.038 ↗
38. 10.1088/0957-4484/17/21/00110.1088/0957-4484/17/21/001 ↗