Effect of laser hatch style on densification behavior, microstructure, and tribological performance of aluminum alloys by selective laser melting
Source abstract
Abstract
A systematic investigation of influence of the laser hatch style on densification behavior, microstructure, and tribological performance of aluminum parts’ preparation by selective laser melting (SLM) was implemented in this study. The scans with checker board (CB) style left better processing quality of surface morphology and few metallurgical defects to SLM parts in comparison with single fill and cross fill styles, hence leading to a relatively high densification level (99.42%). The CB style of shorter scan length left higher undercooling degree in small checker areas compared with other longer scan lengths, leading to finer equiaxed grains to the solidification microstructure. Accordingly, an enhanced mean microhardness of 129.7 HV0.1was obtained in this hatch style, due to the grain refinement strengthening effect. The lowest coefficient of friction of 0.49 and wear rate of 2.43 × 10−4mm3/(N m) were obtained. The improved densification level and formation of refined equiaxed grain and evenly distributed ring-shaped Si particles formed in CB parts changed the mechanism of material removal during sliding from the abrasion to adhesion of the tribolayer, significantly improving the wear resistance of SLM aluminum parts.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · High Entropy Alloys Studies · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.03.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.03.002 ↗
2. Effect of molten pool boundaries on the mechanical properties of selective laser melting parts10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.06.002 ↗
3. 10.1007/s00170-011-3566-110.1007/s00170-011-3566-1 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0022-0248(98)01071-910.1016/S0022-0248(98)01071-9 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.04.11710.1016/j.msea.2006.04.117 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2011.07.010 ↗
7. 10.1557/jmr.2016.13210.1557/jmr.2016.132 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.05110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.11.051 ↗
9. 10.1179/1743280411Y.000000001410.1179/1743280411Y.0000000014 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.00610.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.006 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.03210.1016/j.actamat.2011.12.032 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.02610.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.026 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.03610.1016/j.actamat.2013.04.036 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853-017-0975-z10.1007/s10853-017-0975-z ↗
15. 10.1007/s11665-013-0784-810.1007/s11665-013-0784-8 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.04410.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.06.044 ↗
17. 10.2351/1.481778810.2351/1.4817788 ↗
18. 10.1557/jmr.2014.20410.1557/jmr.2014.204 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.01410.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.014 ↗
20. 10.1557/jmr.2014.16610.1557/jmr.2014.166 ↗
21. 10.1557/jmr.2015.11010.1557/jmr.2015.110 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.06.01110.1016/j.jallcom.2006.06.011 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.11.04710.1016/j.msea.2016.11.047 ↗
24. 10.2351/1.487087710.2351/1.4870877 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.11110.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.111 ↗
26. 10.1557/jmr.2015.26710.1557/jmr.2015.267 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.04410.1016/j.actamat.2016.12.044 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.496141010.1063/1.4961410 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.00910.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.009 ↗
30. 10.1557/jmr.2014.12210.1557/jmr.2014.122 ↗
31. 10.1557/jmr.2017.31410.1557/jmr.2017.314 ↗