Effects of mechanical properties on the contact profile in Berkovich nanoindentation of elastoplastic materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Pile-up or sink-in is always a concern in a nanoindentation test because it gives rise to errors in the estimation of the projected contact area when it is theoretically analyzed with the classic Oliver–Pharr method. In this study, a three-dimensional finite element model is developed to simulate nanoindentation with a perfect Berkovich tip. The variation of the contact profile with respect to the work-hardening ratenand the ratio of yield stress to elastic modulusσy/Ehas been studied for a wide range of elastoplastic materials. The numerical results show that a lowσy/Enot only facilitates the pile-up for materials with little or no work-hardening but also enhances the sink-in for materials with a high work-hardening rate. It is attributed to the lateral-flow dominated plastic deformation in low work-hardening materials and the normal-flow dominated plastic deformation in high work-hardening materials, respectively. Because of the large sink-in, for the materials with highnand lowσy/E, significant errors in the calculation of the projected contact area can be generated by using the classic Oliver–Pharr method.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/09500839817809310.1080/095008398178093 ↗
2. 10.1557/JMR.1999.004210.1557/JMR.1999.0042 ↗
3. 10.1080/0141861020823570010.1080/01418610208235700 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.1998.018510.1557/JMR.1998.0185 ↗
6. 10.1080/0141861960823970710.1080/01418619608239707 ↗
7. 10.1080/0141861990821203710.1080/01418619908212037 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.04410.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.044 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mser.2004.05.00110.1016/j.mser.2004.05.001 ↗
10. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
11. 10.1557/JMR.1986.060110.1557/JMR.1986.0601 ↗
12. 10.1088/0965-0393/14/1/00610.1088/0965-0393/14/1/006 ↗
13. 10.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-710.1016/0020-7683(95)00033-7 ↗
14. 10.1557/JMR.1998.014610.1557/JMR.1998.0146 ↗
15. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)90225-910.1016/0020-7683(94)90225-9 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00724-210.1016/S0921-5093(98)00724-2 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.12187310.1063/1.121873 ↗
18. 10.1557/JMR.2003.023410.1557/JMR.2003.0234 ↗
19. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.03310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.033 ↗
21. 10.1557/JMR.2001.040810.1557/JMR.2001.0408 ↗
22. Tabor · 1951
23. 10.1179/09506600322501022710.1179/095066003225010227 ↗
24. Dieter · 1986