Evaluating indent pile-up with metallic films on ceramic-like substrates
Source abstract
Abstract
This work focused on ascertaining the effect of pile-up during indentation of thin films on substrates. Conventional understanding has postulated that differences in contact area resulting from pile-up or sink-in significantly alter the extraction of material properties. In this work, the specific case of pile-up with compliant, plastically deforming films on stiff, nonplastically deforming substrates was studied. Several literature methods to assess pile-up were leveraged, and a new technique was developed and validated to quantify projected pile-up. Indentation testing was performed on gold films of multiple thicknesses on several ceramic-based substrates. The results indicated that the degree of pile-up was solely a function of indent depth into the film. Pile-up was not influenced by film thickness or substrate elastic modulus. In other words, the pile-up development was insensitive to the presence of the substrate and how it contributes to the composite’s elastic properties. In such case, if the elastic response of the film/substrate composite was independent of the degree of pile-up, then elastic data acquired from unloading did not require a contact area correction. The findings are confirmed using the Zhou–Prorok model for extracting film elastic properties for both gold and platinum films.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/JMR.1996.009110.1557/JMR.1996.0091 ↗
2. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
3. 10.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-810.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-8 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-410.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4 ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.1986.060110.1557/JMR.1986.0601 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00176-710.1016/S0921-5093(97)00176-7 ↗
7. 10.1557/JMR.1998.018510.1557/JMR.1998.0185 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.00610.1016/j.msea.2005.06.006 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmps.2003.07.00110.1016/j.jmps.2003.07.001 ↗
10. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
11. 10.1557/JMR.2010.022810.1557/JMR.2010.0228 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.04.02210.1016/j.tsf.2007.04.022 ↗
13. Elastic contact versus indentation modeling of multi-layered materials10.1016/0020-7683(92)90004-D ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.03310.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.02.033 ↗
15. 10.1557/JMR.2001.040810.1557/JMR.2001.0408 ↗
16. 10.1557/jmr.2011.810.1557/jmr.2011.8 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11340-009-9309-710.1007/s11340-009-9309-7 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00724-210.1016/S0921-5093(98)00724-2 ↗
19. Callister · 2008 · 3
20. 10.1016/0272-8842(82)90013-X10.1016/0272-8842(82)90013-X ↗
21. Gupta · 2005
22. 10.1088/0960-1317/17/4/00610.1088/0960-1317/17/4/006 ↗
23. 10.1038/nmeth.208910.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
24. 10.1023/A:102632140428610.1023/A:1026321404286 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00062-510.1016/S0022-5096(02)00062-5 ↗
26. 10.1557/JMR.1996.009210.1557/JMR.1996.0092 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.030 ↗
29. 10.1557/JMR.1998.014610.1557/JMR.1998.0146 ↗
30. 10.1557/JMR.2008.003210.1557/JMR.2008.0032 ↗
31. 10.1557/PROC-0924-Z03-1310.1557/PROC-0924-Z03-13 ↗
32. 10.1166/jnn.2002.11310.1166/jnn.2002.113 ↗