Characterization and investigation of size effect in nano-impact indentations performed using cube-corner indenter tip
Source abstract
Abstract
The traditional macro-scale form of dynamic indentation measures the dynamic deformation behavior of a material by simulating impact conditions. Similarly, the nano-impact indentation technique, with small-scale contacts and high spatial resolutions, is a novel technique for obtaining mechanical properties of materials at dynamic strain rates (>102s−1). Nano-impact hardness values display a decreasing trend or size effect that continues for several micrometers of indentation depth, compared to the primarily sub micrometer depth range of size effect in quasi-static nanoindentations. For the first time, the factors behind the enhanced size effects for dynamic micro-scale indentations have been investigated by the current work: non-uniform loading and resulting instability using strain rate profiles, plastic wave behavior during loading using resistance force versus indentation depth profiles, quantification of energy of the dynamic plastic wave, and localization of impact strain using electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) mapping of the strain affected vicinity of indentation imprints.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced machining processes and optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Menčík · 2012 · 53
2. 10.1016/0001-6160(82)90131-610.1016/0001-6160(82)90131-6 ↗
3. 10.1080/1478643690822864410.1080/14786436908228644 ↗
4. 10.1016/0020-7403(67)90022-710.1016/0020-7403(67)90022-7 ↗
5. 10.1002/mawe.20130017610.1002/mawe.201300176 ↗
6. Dodd · 2012
7. 10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-010.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11837-013-0593-410.1007/s11837-013-0593-4 ↗
9. 10.2320/matertrans.M200901610.2320/matertrans.M2009016 ↗
10. 10.1007/s11661-007-9142-510.1007/s11661-007-9142-5 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.10110.1016/j.msea.2014.09.101 ↗
12. 10.1179/174328008X27779510.1179/174328008X277795 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11340-008-9198-110.1007/s11340-008-9198-1 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0232488610.1007/BF02324886 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.170736310.1063/1.1707363 ↗
16. Tabor · 1951
17. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01160-110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01160-1 ↗
19. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1980.tb10746.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1980.tb10746.x ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21:4(235)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21:4(235) ↗
21. 10.1063/1.365383910.1063/1.3653839 ↗
22. 10.1088/0022-3727/44/8/08530110.1088/0022-3727/44/8/085301 ↗
23. Heyman · 1968
24. 10.1016/S0020-7683(01)00215-310.1016/S0020-7683(01)00215-3 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0232503610.1007/BF02325036 ↗
26. Johnson · 1972
27. 10.1557/jmr.2012.5210.1557/jmr.2012.52 ↗
28. 10.1016/0022-5096(91)90005-910.1016/0022-5096(91)90005-9 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-1-4613-3219-0_2010.1007/978-1-4613-3219-0_20 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0264653410.1007/BF02646534 ↗
31. Johnson · 1983 · 21 · 541
32. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.11310.1016/j.msea.2014.06.113 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.165822210.1063/1.1658222 ↗
34. Rajaraman · 2013 · 1 · 157
35. 10.1115/1.164587910.1115/1.1645879 ↗
36. 10.1080/14786435.2010.48558510.1080/14786435.2010.485585 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.00310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.003 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.02210.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.022 ↗
39. 10.1088/0256-307X/26/3/03610310.1088/0256-307X/26/3/036103 ↗
40. Strain rate on the failure strain and hardness of metallic armor plates subjected to high velocity projectile impact
41. 10.1016/0036-9748(89)90474-210.1016/0036-9748(89)90474-2 ↗
42. On the prediction of strength from hardness for copper alloys
43. 10.1002/978047017227810.1002/9780470172278 ↗
44. 10.1016/0191-8141(80)90043-710.1016/0191-8141(80)90043-7 ↗