Cu−Zr−Ti ternary bulk metallic glasses correlated with (L → Cu8Zr3 + Cu10Zr7) univariant eutectic reaction
Source abstract
Abstract
Starting from Cu60Zr30Ti10, the compositional dependence of bulk metallic glass (BMG) formation was revisited in the Cu−Zr−Ti ternary system. It was revealed that the optimal BMG-forming composition is located at Cu60Zr33Ti7, for which a monolithic BMG rod 4 mm in diameter can be fabricated using copper mold casting. This composition is along, although slightly off, the univariant eutectic groove for the reaction (L → Cu8Zr3 + Cu10Zr7). With respect to the corresponding Cu−Zr binary alloys, Ti has a significant effect on further stabilizing the liquid, thus increasing the glass-forming ability. For the Cu60Zr40−yTiy (3 ⩽ y ⩽ 10) series BMGs, the glass transition temperature Tg decreased with increasing Ti content, at a rate of about 2.8 K/at.%. Among these BMGs, significant compositional dependence of compressive plasticity is not observed, irrespective of the Tg change. Cu60Zr33Ti7 glass exhibits maximum fracture strength around 2160 MPa.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Electromagnetic wave absorption materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11837-005-0236-510.1007/s11837-005-0236-5 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.274105010.1063/1.2741050 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.013 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.113672610.1126/science.1136726 ↗
5. Phase diagram relationships in the system Cu–Zr–Ti.
6. 10.1063/1.158100110.1063/1.1581001 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.218336710.1063/1.2183367 ↗
8. 10.2320/matertrans.43.292110.2320/matertrans.43.2921 ↗
9. 10.2320/matertrans.45.58410.2320/matertrans.45.584 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.00910.1016/j.actamat.2004.02.009 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.175121910.1063/1.1751219 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.03.03410.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.03.034 ↗
13. 10.1080/0950083050019772410.1080/09500830500197724 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.20550110.1103/PhysRevLett.94.205501 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.221396710.1063/1.2213967 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.07710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.077 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11661-005-0316-810.1007/s11661-005-0316-8 ↗
18. 10.2320/matertrans.47.288210.2320/matertrans.47.2882 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.00710.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.007 ↗
20. Boettinger · 1982 · 15
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.24550410.1103/PhysRevLett.92.245504 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.00310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.003 ↗
23. 10.1557/jmr.2006.002010.1557/jmr.2006.0020 ↗
24. 10.1557/JMR.2003.019710.1557/JMR.2003.0197 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.169763110.1063/1.1697631 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00181-110.1016/S1359-6454(01)00181-1 ↗
27. Arias · 1990 · 1511
28. 10.1063/1.36053710.1063/1.360537 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.19550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.195501 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.04210.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.02.042 ↗