journal article·2011-10-28

A comparative study of anodized titania nanotube architectures in aqueous and nonaqueous solutions

Matthew R. Sturgeon, Peng Lai, Michael Z. Hu

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 26· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

The unique and highly utilized properties of TiO2nanotubes are a direct result of nanotube architecture. To create different engineered architectures, the effects of electrolyte solution, time, and temperature on the anodization of titanium foil were studied along with the resultant anodized titanium oxide (ATO) nanotube architectures encompassing nanotube length, pore diameter, wall thickness, smoothness, and ordered array structure. Titanium foil was anodized in three different electrolyte solutions: one aqueous [consisting of NH4F and (NH4)2SO4] and two nonaqueous (glycerol or ethylene glycol, both containing NH4F) at varying temperatures and anodization times. Variation in anodization applied voltage, initial current, and effect of F-ion concentration on ATO nanotube architecture was also studied. Anodization in the aqueous electrolyte produced short, rough nanotube arrays, whereas anodization in organic electrolytes produced long, smooth nanotube arrays greater than 10 urn in length. A position effect, relative to the solution-air interface, was observed in this work. Furthermore, it was found that anodization in glycerol at elevated temperatures for several hours could possibly produce freely dispersed individual nanotubes.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pssr.20070114810.1002/pssr.200701148 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.05510.1016/j.electacta.2010.03.055 ↗
3. 10.1002/pssa.20062221410.1002/pssa.200622214 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.04110.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.041 ↗
5. 10.1002/anie.20050278110.1002/anie.200502781 ↗
6. 10.1557/JMR.2010.001110.1557/JMR.2010.0011 ↗
7. 10.1021/nl803258p10.1021/nl803258p ↗
8. Paulose · 2005 · 837 · 65
9. 10.1002/anie.20046245910.1002/anie.200462459 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl052099j10.1021/nl052099j ↗
11. 10.1021/nl048301k10.1021/nl048301k ↗
12. 10.1557/JMR.2005.002010.1557/JMR.2005.0020 ↗
13. 10.1088/0022-3727/39/12/00510.1088/0022-3727/39/12/005 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.solmat.2005.08.00510.1016/j.solmat.2005.08.005 ↗
15. 10.1039/b822726h10.1039/b822726h ↗
16. 10.1021/jp070273h10.1021/jp070273h ↗
17. 10.1016/j.electacta.2005.01.01410.1016/j.electacta.2005.01.014 ↗
18. 10.1557/JMR.2001.045710.1557/JMR.2001.0457 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/6/06570710.1088/0957-4484/18/6/065707 ↗
20. 10.1039/b924125f10.1039/b924125f ↗
21. 10.1021/nl070264k10.1021/nl070264k ↗
22. 10.1149/1.154519210.1149/1.1545192 ↗
23. 10.1021/jp066352v10.1021/jp066352v ↗
24. 10.1149/1.200898010.1149/1.2008980 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.05.03010.1016/j.elecom.2006.05.030 ↗
26. 10.1557/JMR.2003.002210.1557/JMR.2003.0022 ↗
27. 10.1557/jmr.2010.3310.1557/jmr.2010.33 ↗
28. 10.1038/nnano.2009.22610.1038/nnano.2009.226 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp075258r10.1021/jp075258r ↗
30. 10.1007/s10832-006-3904-010.1007/s10832-006-3904-0 ↗
31. 10.1088/0957-4484/18/44/44570510.1088/0957-4484/18/44/445705 ↗
32. 10.1021/jp809385x10.1021/jp809385x ↗
33. 10.1021/jp064020k10.1021/jp064020k ↗
34. 10.1002/pssa.20062204110.1002/pssa.200622041 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.elecom.2005.03.00710.1016/j.elecom.2005.03.007 ↗
36. 10.1149/1.217256610.1149/1.2172566 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.06.01310.1016/j.jphotochem.2005.06.013 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.elecom.2005.04.00810.1016/j.elecom.2005.04.008 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.electacta.2006.07.02110.1016/j.electacta.2006.07.021 ↗
40. 10.1088/0022-3727/38/18/03310.1088/0022-3727/38/18/033 ↗
41. 10.1166/jnn.2005.19510.1166/jnn.2005.195 ↗
42. 10.1021/jp052736u10.1021/jp052736u ↗
43. 10.1007/s10853-009-3372-410.1007/s10853-009-3372-4 ↗