Analysis of macroscopic crack branching patterns in chemically strengthened glass
Source abstract
Abstract
Residual stress profiles were introduced in sodium aluminosilicate glass disks using an ion-exchange process. They were fractured in two loading conditions: indentation and biaxial flexure. The fractal dimension of the macroscopic crack branching pattern called the crack branching coefficient (CBC), as well as the number of fragments (NOF) were used to quantify the crack patterns. The fracture surfaces were analyzed to determine the stresses responsible for the crack branching patterns. The total strain energy in the body was calculated. The CBC was a good measure of the NOF. They are directly related to the tensile strain energy due to the residual stress profile for fractures due to indentation loading. However, in general for materials with residual stresses, CBC (or NOF) is not related to the strength or the stress at fracture, or even to the total stored tensile strain energy. Instead, the CBC appears to be related, in a complex manner, to the distribution of stresses in the body. Therefore, in general, the characterization of the CBC of fractured materials cannot be used to ascertain the prior stress distribution.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Glass properties and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Bauld · 1986
2. Quantitative fracture surface analysis of glass materials
3. Mecholsky · 2001 · 3257–3265
4. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04934.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04934.x ↗
5. 1978 · 313–317
6. Symmetrical bending of thin circular elastic plates on equally spaced point supports.
7. 10.1016/0022-3093(80)90455-X10.1016/0022-3093(80)90455-X ↗
8. Biaxial flexure tests of ceramic substrates.
9. A method for determining the strength of sheet glass.
10. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000020002.06117.4610.1023/B:JMSC.0000020002.06117.46 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb09081.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb09081.x ↗
12. 10.1088/0022-3727/25/8/01910.1088/0022-3727/25/8/019 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0072231910.1007/BF00722319 ↗
14. 10.1002/9780470291221.ch1010.1002/9780470291221.ch10 ↗
15. 10.1038/308721a010.1038/308721a0 ↗
16. Mandelbrot · 1982
17. Mechanisms for hackle formation and crack branching
18. Tandon · 2005 · 77–91
19. 10.1016/0022-3093(68)90006-910.1016/0022-3093(68)90006-9 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1964.tb14399.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1964.tb14399.x ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1962.tb11081.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1962.tb11081.x ↗
22. 3 Akeyoshi K. Kanai E. : Mechanical properties of tempered glass Rept. Res. Lab, 17, 1967 23–36
23. Gardon · 1980
24. 10.1007/BF0001250210.1007/BF00012502 ↗
25. Biaxial flexure tests for ceramics.
26. 10.1557/JMR.1991.124810.1557/JMR.1991.1248 ↗
27. Bar-On · 1991 · 645–651
28. 10.1126/science.156.3775.63610.1126/science.156.3775.636 ↗
29. Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate.10.1115/1.4011547 ↗
30. 10.1007/978-1-4899-2124-610.1007/978-1-4899-2124-6 ↗
31. 10.1017/CBO978051162312710.1017/CBO9780511623127 ↗
32. 10.1557/JMR.1998.042910.1557/JMR.1998.0429 ↗
33. Ewalds · 1984
34. Application of fractal geometry measurements to the evaluation of fracture toughness of brittle intermetallics.
35. 1 Norville H.S. , Swofford J.L. , Smith M.L. King K.W. : Survey of window glass broken by the Oklahoma City Bomb on April 19, 1995. Revised, March 1996