journal article·2016-07Open access

Single versus successive pop-in modes in nanoindentation tests of single crystals

Yuzhi Xia, Yanfei Gao, George M. Pharr, Hongbin Bei

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 31· Issue 14

Abstract

From recent nanoindentation experiments, two types of pop-in modes have been identified: a single pop-in with a large displacement excursion and a number of pop-ins with comparable and small displacement excursions. Theoretical analyses are developed here to study the roles played by indenter tip radius, pre-existing defect density, heterogeneous nucleation source type, and lattice resistance on the pop-in modes. The evolution of dislocation structures in earlier pop-ins provides input to modeling a stochastic, heterogeneous mechanism that may be responsible for the subsequent pop-ins. It is found that when the first pop-in occurs near theoretical shear stress, the pop-in mode is determined by the lattice resistance and tip radius. When the first pop-in occurs at low shear stress, whether the successive pop-in mode occurs depends on how the heterogeneous dislocation nucleation source density increases as compared to the increase of the total dislocation density. The above transitions are found to correlate well with the ratio of indenter tip radius to the mean spacing of dislocation nucleation sources.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat142910.1038/nmat1429 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.16550210.1103/PhysRevLett.106.165502 ↗
3. 10.1557/JMR.1993.068510.1557/JMR.1993.0685 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.05.07910.1016/j.msea.2014.05.079 ↗
5. 10.1179/1743284712Y.000000000710.1179/1743284712Y.0000000007 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.00310.1016/j.jmps.2011.04.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.02610.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.07.026 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.06010310.1103/PhysRevB.77.060103 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.334052310.1063/1.3340523 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.00510.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.005 ↗
11. 2000
12. 10.1557/JMR.1992.045010.1557/JMR.1992.0450 ↗
13. J. Mech. Phys. Solids · 2015 · 83 · 104
14. 10.1115/1.403040310.1115/1.4030403 ↗
15. 10.1557/jmr.2013.16410.1557/jmr.2013.164 ↗
16. 10.1039/C5RA05822H10.1039/C5RA05822H ↗
17. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.01110.1016/j.actamat.2012.07.011 ↗
18. 1985
19. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
20. 10.1016/S1572-4859(05)80003-810.1016/S1572-4859(05)80003-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00568-210.1016/S1359-6454(02)00568-2 ↗
22. 1982
23. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.05010.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.050 ↗
25. 10.1098/rspa.1993.005010.1098/rspa.1993.0050 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00119-910.1016/S0022-5096(02)00119-9 ↗
27. 10.1557/JMR.1992.156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00303-810.1016/S1359-6454(02)00303-8 ↗
29. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00009-410.1016/S1359-6454(00)00009-4 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.030 ↗
31. 10.1557/JMR.1995.085310.1557/JMR.1995.0853 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.03610.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.036 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.137220710.1063/1.1372207 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.04550110.1103/PhysRevLett.95.045501 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.03610.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.03.036 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.04310.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.07.043 ↗
37. 10.1557/jmr.2013.25410.1557/jmr.2013.254 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.02310.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.023 ↗
39. 10.1557/jmr.2011.29810.1557/jmr.2011.298 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R1605710.1103/PhysRevB.55.R16057 ↗