Surface-effect territory in small volume creep deformation
Source abstract
Abstract
It is yet unclear how far surface effects can dominate small volume creep deformation in the surface layer of a metallic solid. We report experimental results of the apparent activation volume of single, ultrafine-grained, and nanocrystalline Cu over a range of nanoscale displacements. The dependence of the apparent activation volume on the depth and grain size was determined using nanoindentation creep tests. The surface-affected deformation regimen, within which interfacial diffusion between the nanoindenter tip and the sample totally dominates the creep behavior, was quantitatively determined to be below ∼12 nm. As the initial creep depth is increased, the dominant mechanism is shifted from interfacial diffusion to grain-boundary diffusion as the contribution of the surface effects gradually vanishes when the indenter penetrates deeper into the sample (i.e., further away from the external surface).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.2.51310.1557/jmr.2004.19.2.513 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.03.01810.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.03.018 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.04710.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047 ↗
4. Indentation power-law creep of highpurity indium.10.1007/s11661-999-0051-7 ↗
5. 10.1557/JMR.1994.252410.1557/JMR.1994.2524 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.05310.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.053 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.02810.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.028 ↗
8. 10.1080/1478643770823976010.1080/14786437708239760 ↗
9. XP · 2004
10. 10.1063/1.169968110.1063/1.1699681 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00033-910.1016/S0022-5096(02)00033-9 ↗
12. Frost · 1982
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.02.07910.1016/j.msea.2004.02.079 ↗
14. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01079-610.1016/S0921-5093(01)01079-6 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.194689910.1063/1.1946899 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00006-710.1016/S0079-6425(99)00006-7 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.219346710.1063/1.2193467 ↗
18. 10.1038/nmat142910.1038/nmat1429 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.04.00410.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.04.004 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.212598810.1115/1.2125988 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0055224310.1007/BF00552243 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.02110.1016/j.actamat.2005.08.021 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0167-577X(02)00933-310.1016/S0167-577X(02)00933-3 ↗
24. Smallman · 1985
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.01310.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00175-110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00175-1 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.170265610.1063/1.1702656 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-7 ↗
29. Investigation of stress exponent in the power-law creep of Pb-Sb alloys.10.1016/j.msea.2004.05.078 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0055224110.1007/BF00552241 ↗
31. Caillard · 2003
32. Strain rate sensitivity of nanoindentation creep in polycrystalline Al film on silicon substrate.
33. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
34. Interaction of cracks and dislocations with grain boundaries investigated by focus ion beam microscopy and nanoindentation technique.
35. 10.1063/1.182821310.1063/1.1828213 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.02010.1016/j.actamat.2007.07.020 ↗
37. Krausz · 1975
38. 10.1007/s10853-008-2838-010.1007/s10853-008-2838-0 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.04810.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.048 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.273073510.1063/1.2730735 ↗