Enhanced yield strength in iron nanocomposite with in situ grown single-wall carbon nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
The yield strength of iron-carbon nanotube composites fabricated by in situ chemical vapor deposition of 2.2 vol% single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) inside an iron matrix showed substantial enhancement up to 45%, relative to that of similarly treated pure iron samples without carbon nanotubes of the same piece density. The work hardening coefficient and the Vickers hardness coefficient also significantly increased in these composites relative to the reference samples. X-ray diffraction together with energy dispersive x-ray measurements and micro-Raman spectroscopy indicated no concomitant formation of carbides and very little amorphous carbon during the vapor deposition process. Micro-Raman spectroscopy and scanning and transmission electron microscopy showed spectral signatures and images, respectively, indicating the formation and dispersion of SWNTs within the cavities of the iron matrix. It is suggested that the increased strength of the nanocomposites was due to the mechanical support provided to these cavities by the extremely strong SWNTs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Dependence of mechanical strength of brittle polycrystalline specimens on porosity and grain size.
2. 10.1021/jp012085b10.1021/jp012085b ↗
3. Cao · 2000 · 75
4. 10.1080/0737065910801985810.1080/07370659108019858 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00147-610.1016/S1359-6454(00)00147-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.12410.1016/j.msea.2003.08.124 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00216-310.1016/S0043-1648(03)00216-3 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1359-6462(01)00892-210.1016/S1359-6462(01)00892-2 ↗
9. 10.1016/S1359-6454(00)00147-610.1016/S1359-6454(00)00147-6 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.1401310.1103/PhysRevB.58.14013 ↗
11. 10.1038/381678a010.1038/381678a0 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.129710.1103/PhysRevLett.79.1297 ↗
13. 10.1002/3527605096.ch1010.1002/3527605096.ch10 ↗
14. 10.1557/JMR.1998.034010.1557/JMR.1998.0340 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.160051110.1063/1.1600511 ↗
16. 22. Laub D. : The tripod method to prepare cross-sectional TEM specimen based on the method of Anderson, Benedict and Klepies (Lab Manual EPFL-CIME, 1015 Lausanne Switzerland).
17. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.15340110.1103/PhysRevB.63.153401 ↗
18. 10.1007/s00339005099910.1007/s003390050999 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1369-7021(04)00508-510.1016/S1369-7021(04)00508-5 ↗
20. Rice · 1977 · 2 · 199
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.450210.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4502 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1267810.1103/PhysRevB.59.12678 ↗
23. Callister · 2003 · 111
24. 10.1021/ja992083t10.1021/ja992083t ↗
25. 10.1126/science.277.5334.197110.1126/science.277.5334.1971 ↗
26. Pisrenko · 1968 · 3
27. 10.1016/j.msec.2003.09.08510.1016/j.msec.2003.09.085 ↗
28. 10.1038/nmat116110.1038/nmat1161 ↗
29. 10.1038/nmat79310.1038/nmat793 ↗
30. 10.1126/science.275.5297.18710.1126/science.275.5297.187 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0927-0256(97)00047-510.1016/S0927-0256(97)00047-5 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00764-810.1016/S0009-2614(00)00764-8 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0054045110.1007/BF00540451 ↗