journal article·1992-10

Natural-abundance 13C dynamic nuclear polarization experiments on chemical vapor deposited diamond film

Herman Lock, Gary E. Maciel, Curtis E. Johnson

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 7· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

13C cross-polarization (CP) and direct-polarization (DP) spectra of an 83 mg sample of a chemical vapor deposited (CVD) diamond film (combined from 12 separate depositions) have been obtained via dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) combined with magic-angle spinning (MAS). With DNP, the presence of unpaired electron spins in the sample, measured to be 2 × 1018 spins/g, provides a way to enhance the 13C or the “residual” 1H signal by irradiating the sample with microwaves at or near the electron spin resonance (ESR) Larmor frequency; the interactions between the unpaired electrons and protons or 13C spins lead to a transfer of polarization from the electron spin system to the 1H and/or 13C spin systems. No signal for sp2 hybridized carbons could be observed. The DNP-CP-MAS spectrum, obtained in an experiment in which the DNP-enhanced proton polarization is in turn transferred via CP to the 13C spin system, differs significantly from the DNP-DP-MAS spectrum, in which the 13C spins are directly enhanced.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · High-pressure geophysics and materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. Hartmann · Phys. Rev. · 1992 · 128
2. Schaefer · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1976 · 98
3. Lowe · Phys. Rev. · 1968 · 166
4. 10.1002/cmr.182001010710.1002/cmr.1820010107 ↗
5. Johnson · Mater. Res. Bull. · 1989 · XXIV
6. 18A much sharper resonance, with a Tle of 0.3 ms, has been observed on this sample at 40 GHz, using a microwave field of much lower intensity (0.2 μ W) at the University of Denver ESR Laboratory. The unpaired electrons with such a large Tle value should not contribute substantially to the solid-state DNP results obtained in this study.
7. 10.1021/ac00168a02110.1021/ac00168a021 ↗
8. Andrew · Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. · 1972 · 8
9. Abragam · 1961
10. Henrichs · J. Magn. Reson. · 1984 · 58
11. 10.1063/1.35139210.1063/1.351392 ↗
12. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06099.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06099.x ↗
13. Blumberg · Phys. Rev. · 1960 · 119
14. Watanabe · Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 27
15. 10.1126/science.241.4868.91310.1126/science.241.4868.913 ↗
16. 10.1557/JMR.1989.038510.1557/JMR.1989.0385 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.10661610.1063/1.106616 ↗
18. Wind · J. Magn. Reson. · 1983 · 52
19. 10.1557/JMR.1991.213410.1557/JMR.1991.2134 ↗
20. McNamara · NATO-ASI Series B: Physics · 1991 · 266
21. 23This estimate is based on the calculation of the overall 13C spin-lattice relaxation behavior, assuming that this relaxation is governed by the unpaired electrons and a Tle on the order of 500 μS.
22. 10.1016/0009-2614(83)80650-210.1016/0009-2614(83)80650-2 ↗
23. Maciel · Adv. Magn. Reson. · 1990 · 14
24. 10.1016/0079-6565(85)80005-410.1016/0079-6565(85)80005-4 ↗
25. Chang · J. Appl. Phys. · 1988 · 63
26. 10.1143/JJAP.30.107310.1143/JJAP.30.1073 ↗
27. McNamara · 1989 · 207