Cohesive properties, electronic structure, and bonding characteristics of RuAl—A comparison to NiAl
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent experiments on promising high-temperature aluminide intermetallic compounds discovered that, in contrast to NiAl, RuAl has critical 〈111〉 slip systems that facilitate ductility under compression at room temperature. In order to understand this different mechanical property from a microscopic point of view, the cohesive and electronic properties of NiAl and RuAl have been studied by means of the first principles local density all-electron self-consistent linearized muffin-tin orbital (LMTO) and full-potential linearized augmented plane wave (FLAPW) methods. The ground state cohesive properties calculated by the LMTO method (including equilibrium lattice constant, bulk modulus, and formation energy) are found to be in good agreement with experiment. The analysis of the band structure and density of states shows that the transition metal (Ni or Ru) d-Al p hybridization provides the major contribution to the cohesive energy in both compounds. The anti-phase boundary (APB) energy of RuAl associated with the ½〈111〉 {110} superdislocation (580 mJ/m2) is found to be only 65% that of NiAl. Moreover, the charge density near the Fermi energy reveals that (i) the strong Ni d-Al p hybridization at EF for NiAl causes a directional charge distribution along the 〈111〉 direction which may affect its dislocation dissociation; (ii) for RuAl, a mostly Ru-d electron charge distribution shows only d-d bonding along the 〈100〉 direction between Ru atoms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Quasicrystal Structures and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Yoo · Oak Ridge Report · 1988
2. 10.1088/0305-4608/15/9/01010.1088/0305-4608/15/9/010 ↗
3. Colinet · J. Phys. C · 1989 · 1 · 5837
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.21.550510.1103/PhysRevB.21.5505 ↗
5. Miracle · 1989 · 133 · 225
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.24.86410.1103/PhysRevB.24.864 ↗
7. 10.1080/0950083900821505310.1080/09500839008215053 ↗
8. 10.1146/annurev.ms.19.080189.00131110.1146/annurev.ms.19.080189.001311 ↗
9. Kubaschewski · 1967
10. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90251-310.1016/0001-6160(66)90251-3 ↗
11. Noebe · 1989 · 271
12. von Mises · Math. Mech. · 1928 · 8 · 161
13. 10.1007/978-94-009-0915-1_410.1007/978-94-009-0915-1_4 ↗
14. Vedula · 1987 · 81 · 381
15. Hirth · 1982
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.644610.1103/PhysRevB.43.6446 ↗
17. 10.1080/1478643630821383810.1080/14786436308213838 ↗
18. Darolia · 1989 · 133 · 113
19. 10.1007/BF0322016310.1007/BF03220163 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
21. 10.1088/0022-3719/4/14/02210.1088/0022-3719/4/14/022 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.11.210910.1103/PhysRevB.11.2109 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.56110.1103/PhysRevB.30.561 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.201810.1103/PhysRevB.43.2018 ↗
25. Villars · 1986
26. 10.1143/JPSJ.45.157510.1143/JPSJ.45.1575 ↗
27. 10.1088/0305-4608/10/3/01310.1088/0305-4608/10/3/013 ↗
28. 10.2320/matertrans1989.31.43510.2320/matertrans1989.31.435 ↗
29. Hultgren · 1973
30. Brandes · 1983
31. 10.1016/0025-5416(70)90082-010.1016/0025-5416(70)90082-0 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0265680810.1007/BF02656808 ↗
33. Clapp · 1989 · 133 · 29
34. 10.1080/1478643770823598910.1080/14786437708235989 ↗
35. 10.1088/0305-4608/10/10/01510.1088/0305-4608/10/10/015 ↗
36. Sarma · J. Phys. C · 1989 · 1 · 9131
37. 10.1051/jphyslet:01974003501102250010.1051/jphyslet:019740035011022500 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.42.158210.1103/PhysRevB.42.1582 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.39.492110.1103/PhysRevB.39.4921 ↗
40. Carlsson · 1987 · 81 · 39
41. 10.1002/pssb.222095012410.1002/pssb.2220950124 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.12.306010.1103/PhysRevB.12.3060 ↗
43. 10.1002/pssb.1970041013510.1002/pssb.19700410135 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.19.609410.1103/PhysRevB.19.6094 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.10.485610.1103/PhysRevB.10.4856 ↗