Validation of ACI 369.1 Code Nonlinear Modeling Parameters Using Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Building
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Seismic Performance and Analysis · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. ASCE/SEI 41-17, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2017, 576 pp.
2. ACI Committee 369, “Standard Requirements for Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Concrete Buildings (ACI 369.1-17) and Commentary,” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2017, 110 pp.
3. Suwal, A., “Performance Evaluation of a Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame Building,” PhD dissertation, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 2018.
4. Blume. J. A., and Assoc., “Chapter 29: Holiday Inn,” San Fernando, California Earthquake of February 9, 1971, Volume I, Part A, U. S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Washington, DC, 1973.
5. Krawinkler, H., “Van Nuys Hotel Building Testbed Report: Exercising Seismic Performance Assessment,” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2005.
6. Suwal, A.; Khodadadi Koodiani, H.; Matamoros, A.; and Lepage, A., Probabilistic Evaluation of Modeling Parameters for Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame Building, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023, pp. 80-89.10.1007/978-3-031-32511-3_9 ↗
7. Sen, A.; Cook, D.; Liel, A.; Basnet, T.; Creagh, A.; Khodadadi Koodiani, H.; Berkowitz, R.; Ghannoum, W.; Hortacsu, A.; Kim, I.; Lehman, D.; Lowes, L.; Matamoros, A.; Naeim, F.; Sattar, S.; and Smith, R., “ASCE/SEI 41 Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings: Benchmarking Linear Procedures and FEMA P-2018 with Empirical Damage Observations,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 39, No. 3, 2023, pp. 1658-1682. doi: 10.1177/8755293023117345410.1177/87552930231173454 ↗
8. Sen, A.; Cook, D.; Liel, A.; Basnet, T.; Creagh, A.; Khodadadi Koodiani, H.; Berkowitz, R.; Ghannoum, W.; Hortacsu, A.; Kim, I.; Lehman, D.; Lowes, L.; Matamoros, A.; Naeim, F.; Sattar, S.; and Smith, R., “ASCE/SEI 41 Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings: Benchmarking Nonlinear Dynamic Procedures with Empirical Damage Observations,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 39, No. 3, 2023, pp. 1721-1754. doi: 10.1177/8755293023117345310.1177/87552930231173453 ↗
9. Trifunac, M.; Ivanovic, S.; and Todorovska, M., “Instrumented 7-Story Reinforced Concrete Building in Van Nuys, California: Description of the Damage from the 1994 Northridge Earthquake and Strong Motion Data,” Report CE, V. 99, No. 2. 1999.
10. McKenna, F.; Fenves, G. L.; and Scott, M. H., “Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation,” University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, 2000.
11. NIST GCR 12-917-21, “Soil-Structure Interaction for Building Structures,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 2012, 292 pp.
12. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 625 pp.
13. Kent, D. C., and Park, R., “Flexural Members with Confined Concrete,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, V. 97, No. 7, 1971, pp. 1969-1990. doi: 10.1061/JSDEAG.000295710.1061/JSDEAG.0002957 ↗
14. Mander, T. J., and Matamoros, A. B., “Constitutive Modeling and Overstrength Factors for Reinforcing Steel,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 3, May 2019, pp. 219-232. doi: 10.14359/5171332010.14359/51713320 ↗
15. Ibarra, L. F.; Medina, R. A.; and Krawinkler, H., “Hysteretic Models that Incorporate Strength and Stiffness Deterioration,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, V. 34, No. 12, 2005, pp. 1489-1511. doi: 10.1002/eqe.49510.1002/eqe.495 ↗
16. Altoontash, A., “Simulation and Damage Models for Performance Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Beam-Column Joints,” PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2004, 232 pp.
17. Lignos, D., “Sidesway Collapse of Deteriorating Structural Systems Under Seismic Excitations,” PhD dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2008, 457 pp.
18. Haselton, C. B., and Liel, A. B., “Beam-Column Element Model Calibrated for Predicting Flexural Response Leading to Global Collapse of RC Frame Buildings,” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA, 2008, 136 pp.
19. Hwang, S.-J., and Moehle, J. P., “Models for Laterally Loaded Slab-Column Frames,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 2000, pp. 345-352.10.14359/866 ↗
20. Kang, T. H.-K.; Wallace, J. W.; and Elwood, K. J., “Nonlinear Modeling of Flat-Plate Systems,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 135, No. 2, 2009, pp. 147-158. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(147)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(147) ↗
21. Pecknold, D. A., “Slab Effective Width for Equivalent Frame Analysis,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 72, No. 4, Apr. 1975, pp. 135-137.10.14359/11121 ↗
22. Durrani, A.; Du, Y.; and Luo, Y., “Seismic Resistance of Nonductile Slab-Column Connections in Existing Flat-Slab Buildings,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 92, No. 4, July-Aug. 1995, pp. 479-487.10.14359/997 ↗
23. Allen, F., and Darvall, P., “Lateral Load Equivalent Frame,” ACI Journal Proceedings, V. 74, No. 7, July 1977, pp. 294-299.10.14359/11014 ↗
24. Grossman, J. S., “Verification of Proposed Design Methodologies for Effective Width of Slabs in Slab-Column Frames,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 94, No. 2, Mar.-Apr. 1997, pp. 181-196.10.14359/472 ↗
25. Vanderbilt, M. D., and Corley, W. G., “Frame Analysis of Concrete Buildings,” Concrete International, V. 5, No. 12, Dec. 1983, pp. 33-43.
26. Elwood, K. J.; Matamoros, A. B.; Wallace, J. W.; Lehman, D. E.; Heintz, J. A.; Mitchell, A. D.; Moore, M. A.; Valley, M. T.; Lowes, L. N.; Comartin, C. D.; and Moehle, J. P., “Update to ASCE/SEI 41 Concrete Provisions,” Earthquake Spectra, V. 23, No. 3, 2007, pp. 493-523. doi: 10.1193/1.275771410.1193/1.2757714 ↗
27. Ghannoum, W. M., and Matamoros, A. B., “Nonlinear Modeling Parameters and Acceptance Criteria for Concrete Columns,” Seismic Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings, SP-297, K. J. Elwood, J. Dragovich, and I. Kim, eds., American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, pp. 1-24.
28. Dragovich, J. J., and Lepage, A., “FDE Index for Goodness‐Of‐Fit Between Measured and Calculated Response Signals,” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, V. 38, No. 15, 2009, pp. 1751-1758. doi: 10.1002/eqe.95110.1002/eqe.951 ↗
29. Lepage, A.; Hopper, M. W.; Delgado, S. A.; and Dragovich, J. J., “Best-Fit Models for Nonlinear Seismic Response of Reinforced Concrete Frames,” Engineering Structures, V. 32, No. 9, 2010, pp. 2931-2939. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.01210.1016/j.engstruct.2010.05.012 ↗
30. Khodadadi Koodiani, H.; Majlesi, A.; Shahriar, A.; and Matamoros, A., “Non-Linear Modeling Parameters for New Construction RC Columns,” Frontiers in Built Environment, V. 9, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2023.110831910.3389/fbuil.2023.1108319 ↗
31. Khodadadi Koodiani, H.; Jafari, E.; Majlesi, A.; Shahin, M.; Matamoros, A.; and Alaeddini, A., “Machine Learning Tools to Improve Nonlinear Modeling Parameters of RC Columns,” arXiv preprint, 2023. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.1614010.1016/j.jobe.2024.108492 ↗
32. Charney, F. A., “Unintended Consequences of Modeling Damping in Structures,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 134, No. 4, 2008, pp. 581-592. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(581)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:4(581) ↗
33. Islam, M. S., “Analysis of the Northridge Earthquake Response of a Damaged Non‐Ductile Concrete Frame Building,” Structural Design of Tall Buildings, V. 5, No. 3, 1996, pp. 151-182. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199609)5:33.0.CO;2-410.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199609)5:3<151::AID-TAL76>3.0.CO;2-4 ↗
34. Lepage, A., “A Method for Drift-Control in Earthquake-Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Building Structures,” PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1997.
35. Barin, B., and Pincheira, J. A., “Influence of Modeling Parameters and Assumptions on the Seismic Response of an Existing RC Building,” Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI, 2002.
36. Paspuleti, C., “Seismic Analysis of an Older Reinforced Concrete Frame Structure,” master’s thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 2002.
37. Todorovska, M., and Trifunac, M., “Impulse Response Analysis of the Van Nuys 7-Story Hotel During 11 Earthquakes (1971-1994): One-Dimensional Wave Propagation and Inferences on Global and Local Reduction of Stiffness Due to Earthquake Damage,” Report CE 06-01, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2006, 61 pp.