Hydroxyapatite modified with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane as a filler for dental resin-based composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Hydroxyapatite modified with methacrylate groups-bearing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane was for the first time applied as a filler in the experimental composite for dental applications. As the modifier changed the hydroxyapatite surface from hydrophilic to hydrophobic, it was predicted that the stability of the obtained composites would be improved in comparison with raw hydroxyapatite-filled composites. The stability in the oral imitating environment, basic physicochemical properties, and remineralizing potential understood as the ability to release calcium ions, were examined. The distribution of the fillers in the organic matrix, composites’ degree of conversion, depth of cure, flexural and compressive strengths, sorption, and solubility after 2 and 12 weeks of incubation, and the concentrations of calcium released were examined. The results were subjected to statistical analysis. The filler modification resulted in the improvement of the composites’ mass stability during long-term incubation with simultaneous beneficial more balanced calcium release profiles and comparable physicochemical properties. Graphical abstract
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. S.V. Dorozhkin, Bioceramics of calcium orthophosphates. Biomaterials 31, 1465–1485 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.05010.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.050 ↗
2. S.V. Dorozhkin, M. Epple, Biological and medical significance of calcium phosphates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 41, 3130–3146 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20020902)41:17%3c3130::AID-ANIE3130%3e3.0.CO;2-110.1002/1521-3773(20020902)41:17<3130::AID-ANIE3130>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
3. S.V. Dorozhkin, Calcium orthophosphates in dentistry. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 24, 1335–1363 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-013-4898-110.1007/s10856-013-4898-1 ↗
4. H. Ehrlich, P.G. Koutsoukos, K.D. Demadis, O.S. Pokrovsky, Principles of demineralization: Modern strategies for the isolation of organic frameworks. Micron 39, 1062–1091 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2008.02.00410.1016/j.micron.2008.02.004 ↗
5. R.R. Braga, Calcium phosphates as ion-releasing fillers in restorative resin-based materials. Dent. Mater. 35, 3–14 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.28810.1016/j.dental.2018.08.288 ↗
6. P. Laurance-Young, L. Bozec, L. Gracia, G. Rees, F. Lippert, R.J.M. Lynch, J.C. Knowles, A review of the structure of human and bovine dental hard tissues and their physicochemical behaviour in relation to erosive challenge and remineralisation. J. Dent. 39, 266–272 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.00810.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.008 ↗
7. M.A. Meyers, P.-Y. Chen, A.Y.-M. Lin, Y. Seki, Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 53, 1–206 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.00210.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002 ↗
8. I.M. Low, N. Duraman, U. Mahmood, Mapping the structure, composition and mechanical properties of human teeth. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 28, 243–247 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.12.01310.1016/j.msec.2006.12.013 ↗
9. Z. Okulus, T. Buchwald, A. Voelkel, Calcium release from experimental dental materials. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 68, 213–220 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.05.11610.1016/j.msec.2016.05.116 ↗
10. Z. Okulus, T. Buchwald, A. Voelkel, Characterization of light-cured, dental-resin-based biocomposites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/app.4281210.1002/app.42812 ↗
11. Z. Okulus, A. Voelkel, Mechanical properties of experimental composites with different calcium phosphates fillers. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 78, 1101–1108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.15810.1016/j.msec.2017.04.158 ↗
12. H. Ghanbari, B.G. Cousins, A.M. Seifalian, A nanocage for nanomedicine: polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS): a nanocage for nanomedicine …. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 32, 1032–1046 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.20110012610.1002/marc.201100126 ↗
13. G. Li, L. Wang, H. Ni, Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) polymers and copolymers: a review. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. 11, 123–154 (2001)10.1023/A:1015287910502 ↗
14. R.Y. Kannan, H.J. Salacinski, P.E. Butler, A.M. Seifalian, Polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane nanocomposites: the next generation material for biomedical applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 879–884 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar050055b10.1021/ar050055b ↗
15. X. Wu, Y. Sun, W. Xie, Y. Liu, X. Song, Development of novel dental nanocomposites reinforced with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS). Dent. Mater. 26, 456–462 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.16110.1016/j.dental.2009.11.161 ↗
16. W. Wang, X. Sun, L. Huang, Y. Gao, J. Ban, L. Shen, J. Chen, Structure–property relationships in hybrid dental nanocomposite resins containing monofunctional and multifunctional polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes. Int. J. Nanomed. 84, 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S5606210.2147/IJN.S56062 ↗
17. Z. Buchwald, M. Szołyga, J. Zwolińska, B. Marciniec, A. Voelkel, Surface modification of hydroxyapatite with polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane. React. Funct. Polym. 170, 105131 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.10513110.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2021.105131 ↗
18. Z. Okulus, T. Buchwald, M. Szybowicz, A. Voelkel, Study of a new resin-based composites containing hydroxyapatite filler using Raman and infrared spectroscopy. Mater. Chem. Phys. 145, 304–312 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.02.01210.1016/j.matchemphys.2014.02.012 ↗
19. R.Z. Alshali, N. Silikas, J.D. Satterthwaite, Degree of conversion of bulk-fill compared to conventional resin-composites at two time intervals. Dent. Mater. 29, e213–e217 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.05.01110.1016/j.dental.2013.05.011 ↗
20. M.J. German, Developments in resin-based composites. Br. Dent. J. 232, 638–643 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-022-4240-810.1038/s41415-022-4240-8 ↗
21. A. Aydınoğlu, A.B.H. Yoruç, Effects of silane-modified fillers on properties of dental composite resin. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 79, 382–389 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2017.04.15110.1016/j.msec.2017.04.151 ↗
22. I.D. Sideridou, M.M. Karabela, Effect of the amount of 3-methacyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane coupling agent on physical properties of dental resin nanocomposites. Dent. Mater. 25, 1315–1324 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.03.01610.1016/j.dental.2009.03.016 ↗
23. L.M. Cavalcante, L.G. Ferraz, K.B. Antunes, I.M. Garcia, L.F.J. Schneider, F.M. Collares, Silane content influences physicochemical properties in nanostructured model composites. Dent. Mater. 37, e85–e93 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.10.02210.1016/j.dental.2020.10.022 ↗
24. ISO_4049_2019_EN, (n.d.).
25. R.L. Sakaguchi, J.M. Powers, Craig’s Restorative Dental Materials, Thirteen. (Elsevier, New York, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-08108-5.10001-510.1016/B978-0-323-08108-5.10001-5 ↗
26. K. Chun, H. Choi, J. Lee, Comparison of mechanical property and role between enamel and dentin in the human teeth. J. Dent. Biomech. 5, 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/175873601452080910.1177/1758736014520809 ↗
27. X. Zhang, Q. Zhang, X. Meng, Y. Ye, D. Feng, J. Xue, H. Wang, H. Huang, M. Wang, J. Wang, Rheological and mechanical properties of resin-based materials applied in dental restorations. Polymers 13, 2975 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym1317297510.3390/polym13172975 ↗
28. S. Şahin, M.C. Çehreli, E. Yalçın, The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses—a review. J. Dent. 30, 271–282 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00065-910.1016/S0300-5712(02)00065-9 ↗
29. M. Sandomierski, Z. Buchwald, T. Buchwald, A. Voelkel, Silica-filled methacrylic composites with extremely high compressive strength. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 116, 104319 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.10431910.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104319 ↗
30. K. Cho, G. Rajan, P. Farrar, L. Prentice, B.G. Prusty, Dental resin composites: a review on materials to product realizations. Compos. Part B 230, 109495 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10949510.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109495 ↗
31. N. Ilie, T.J. Hilton, S.D. Heintze, R. Hickel, D.C. Watts, N. Silikas, J.W. Stansbury, M. Cadenaro, J.L. Ferracane, Academy of dental materials guidance—resin composites: part i—mechanical properties. Dent. Mater. 33, 880–894 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.01310.1016/j.dental.2017.04.013 ↗
32. J.L. Ferracane, Resin-based composite performance: are there some things we can’t predict? Dent. Mater. 29, 51–58 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.06.01310.1016/j.dental.2012.06.013 ↗
33. G. Guo, Y. Fan, J.-F. Zhang, J.L. Hagan, X. Xu, Novel dental composites reinforced with zirconia–silica ceramic nanofibers. Dent. Mater. 28, 360–368 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.00610.1016/j.dental.2011.11.006 ↗
34. J.L. Ferracane, Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent. Mater. 22, 211–222 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.00510.1016/j.dental.2005.05.005 ↗
35. R. Bagheri, M.J. Tyas, M.F. Burrow, Subsurface degradation of resin-based composites. Dent. Mater. 23, 944–951 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.03510.1016/j.dental.2006.06.035 ↗
36. B.R.C. De Menezes, A.D.G. Sampaio, D.M. Da Silva, L.S. Montagna, T.L.D.A. Montanheiro, C.Y. KogaIto, G.P. Thim, Nanocomposites obtained by incorporation of silanized silver nanowires to improve mechanical properties and prevent fungal adhesion. Nano Sel. 2, 2358–2372 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/nano.20210009510.1002/nano.202100095 ↗
37. H.Y. Marghalani, Sorption and solubility characteristics of self-adhesive resin cements. Dent. Mater. 28, e187–e198 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.03710.1016/j.dental.2012.04.037 ↗
38. L.J. Walsh, Contemporary technologies for remineralization therapies: a review, 11 (n.d.).
39. E. AbouNeel, A. Aljabo, A. Strange, S. Ibrahim, M. Coathup, A. Young, L. Bozec, V. Mudera, Demineralization & remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone. Int. J. Nanomed. 11, 4743–4763 (2016). https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S10762410.2147/IJN.S107624 ↗
40. T.O. Rifane, K.E.M. Cordeiro, F.A. Silvestre, M.T. Souza, E.D. Zanotto, V.G. Araújo-Neto, M. Giannini, S. Sauro, D.M. De Paula, V.P. Feitosa, Impact of silanization of different bioactive glasses in simplified adhesives on degree of conversion, dentin bonding and collagen remineralization. Dent. Mater. 39, 217–226 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.01.00510.1016/j.dental.2023.01.005 ↗