Characterization of TiO2 nanotube formation on additively manufactured Ti6Al4V surfaces for medical implants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. J.O. Abaricia, A.H. Shah, M.N. Ruzga, R. Olivares-Navarrete, Surface characteristics on commercial dental implants differentially activate macrophages in vitro and in vivo. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 32, 487–497 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.1371710.1111/clr.13717 ↗
2. A. Stricker, T. Bergfeldt, T. Fretwurst, O. Addison, R. Schmelzeisen, R. Rothweiler, K. Nelson, C. Gross, Impurities in commercial titanium dental implants – a mass and optical emission spectrometry elemental analysis. Dent. Mater. 38, 1395–1403 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.02810.1016/j.dental.2022.06.028 ↗
3. S. Zinelis, A. Thomas, K. Syres, N. Silikas, G. Eliades, Surface characterization of zirconia dental implants. Dent. Mater. 26, 295–305 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.07910.1016/j.dental.2009.11.079 ↗
4. J.W. Nicholson, Titanium alloys for dental implants: a review. Prosthesis 2, 100–116 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis202001110.3390/prosthesis2020011 ↗
5. L.C. Zhang, L.Y. Chen, A review on biomedical titanium alloys: recent progress and prospect. Adv. Eng. Mater. 21, 1–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.20180121510.1002/adem.201801215 ↗
6. H.D. Nguyen, A. Pramanik, A.K. Basak, Y. Dong, C. Prakash, S. Debnath, S. Shankar, I.S. Jawahir, S. Dixit, D. Buddhi, A critical review on additive manufacturing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy: microstructure and mechanical properties. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 18, 4641–4661 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.05510.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.055 ↗
7. K. Das, V.K. Balla, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bose, Surface modification of laser-processed porous titanium for load-bearing implants. Scr. Mater. 59, 822–825 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.01810.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.06.018 ↗
8. O.A. González-Estrada, A.D. Pertuz Comas, R. Ospina, Characterization of hydroxyapatite coatings produced by pulsed-laser deposition on additive manufacturing Ti6Al4V ELI. Thin Solid Films (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2022.13959210.1016/j.tsf.2022.139592 ↗
9. R.K. Mittal, R.K. Singh, S.S. Kulkarni, P. Kumar, H.C. Barshilia, Characterization of anti-abrasion and anti-friction coatings on micromachining response in high speed micromilling of Ti-6Al-4V. J. Manuf. Process. 34, 303–312 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2018.06.02110.1016/j.jmapro.2018.06.021 ↗
10. Y.C. Shin, J.H. Bae, J.H. Lee, I.S. Raja, M.S. Kang, B. Kim, S.W. Hong, J.B. Huh, D.W. Han, Enhanced osseointegration of dental implants with reduced graphene oxide coating. Biomater. Res. 26, 1–16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-022-00257-710.1186/s40824-022-00257-7 ↗
11. J.W. Park, H.K. Kim, Y.J. Kim, J.H. Jang, H. Song, T. Hanawa, Osteoblast response and osseointegration of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy implant incorporating strontium. Acta Biomater. 6, 2843–2851 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.01710.1016/j.actbio.2010.01.017 ↗
12. B.S. Lee, H.J. Lee, K.S. Lee, H.G. Kim, G.H. Kim, C.W. Lee, Enhanced osseointegration of Ti6Al4V ELI screws built-up by electron beam additive manufacturing: an experimental study in rabbits. Appl. Surf. Sci. 508, 145160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.14516010.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145160 ↗
13. C. Chang Tu, P.I. Tsai, S.Y. Chen, M.Y.P. Kuo, J.S. Sun, J.Z.C. Chang, 3D laser-printed porous Ti6Al4V dental implants for compromised bone support. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 119, 420–429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2019.07.02310.1016/j.jfma.2019.07.023 ↗
14. K. Das, S. Bose, A. Bandyopadhyay, TiO2 nanotubes on Ti: Influence of nanoscale morphology on bone cell-materials interaction. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 90, 225–237 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3208810.1002/jbm.a.32088 ↗
15. A. Civantos, E. Martínez-Campos, V. Ramos, C. Elvira, A. Gallardo, A. Abarrategi, Titanium coatings and surface modifications: toward clinically useful bioactive implants. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3, 1245–1261 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b0060410.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00604 ↗
16. A. Bandyopadhyay, F. Espana, V.K. Balla, S. Bose, Y. Ohgami, N.M. Davies, Influence of porosity on mechanical properties and in vivo response of Ti6Al4V implants. Acta Biomater. 6, 1640–1648 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.01110.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.011 ↗
17. D. Decha-umphai, H. Chunate, T. Phetrattanarangsi, T. Boonchuduang, M. Choosri, C. Puncreobutr, B. Lohwongwatana, J. Khamwannah, Effects of post-processing on microstructure and adhesion strength of TiO2 nanotubes on 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Surf. Coatings Technol. 421, 127431 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.12743110.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127431 ↗
18. P. Roy, S. Berger, P. Schmuki, TiO2 nanotubes: synthesis and applications. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 50, 2904–2939 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.20100137410.1002/anie.201001374 ↗
19. S. Maleksaeedi, J.K. Wang, A. El-Hajje, L. Harb, V. Guneta, Z. He, F.E. Wiria, C. Choong, A.J. Ruys, Toward 3D printed bioactive titanium scaffolds with bimodal pore size distribution for bone ingrowth. Procedia CIRP 5, 158–163 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.01.03210.1016/j.procir.2013.01.032 ↗
20. M. Mansoorianfar, M. Tavoosi, R. Mozafarinia, A. Ghasemi, A. Doostmohammadi, Preparation and characterization of TiO2 nanotube arrays on Ti6Al4V surface for enhancement of cell treatment. Surf. Coatings Technol. 321, 409–415 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.05.01610.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.05.016 ↗
21. M.F. Kunrath, R. Hubler, R.S.A. Shinkai, E.R. Teixeira, Application of TiO2 nanotubes as a drug delivery system for biomedical implants: a critical overview. ChemistrySelect 3, 11180–11189 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.20180145910.1002/slct.201801459 ↗
22. A. Radtke, A. Topolski, T. Jędrzejewski, W. Kozak, B. Sadowska, M. Więckowska-Szakiel, M. Szubka, E. Talik, L.P. Nielsen, P. Piszczek, The bioactivity and photocatalytic properties of titania nanotube coatings produced with the use of the low-potential anodization of Ti6Al4V alloy surface. Nanomaterials 7, 1–15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano708019710.3390/nano7080197 ↗
23. S. Poddar, A. Bit, S.K. Sinha, A study on influence of anodization on the morphology of titania nanotubes over Ti6Al4V alloy in correlation to hard tissue engineering application. Mater. Chem. Phys. 254, 123457 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12345710.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123457 ↗
24. K. Das, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bose, Biocompatibility and in situ growth of TiO2 nanotubes on Ti using different electrolyte chemistry. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 2808–2814 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02545.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02545.x ↗
25. B. Ribeiro, R. Offoiach, S. Rossetti, E. Salatin, M. Lekka, L. Fedrizzi, On growth and morphology of TiO2 nanotubes on CP-Ti by anodic oxidation in ethylene glycol electrolyte: influence of electrolyte aging and anodization parameters. Materials (Basel) (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma1509333810.3390/ma15093338 ↗
26. Y. Hu, K. Cai, Z. Luo, D. Xu, D. Xie, Y. Huang, W. Yang, P. Liu, TiO2 nanotubes as drug nanoreservoirs for the regulation of mobility and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 8, 439–448 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.02110.1016/j.actbio.2011.10.021 ↗
27. L. Mohan, C. Anandan, N. Rajendran, Drug release characteristics of quercetin-loaded TiO2 nanotubes coated with chitosan. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 93, 1633–1638 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.03410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.04.034 ↗
28. F. Nowruzi, R. Imani, S. Faghihi, Effect of electrochemical oxidation and drug loading on the antibacterial properties and cell biocompatibility of titanium substrates. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12332-z10.1038/s41598-022-12332-z ↗
29. I.K. Shim, H.J. Chung, M.R. Jung, S.Y. Nam, S.Y. Lee, H. Lee, S.J. Heo, S.J. Lee, Biofunctional porous anodized titanium implants for enhanced bone regeneration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 102, 3639–3648 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3502610.1002/jbm.a.35026 ↗
30. S.F. Robertson, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bose, Titania nanotube interface to increase adhesion strength of hydroxyapatite sol-gel coatings on Ti-6Al-4V for orthopedic applications. Surf. Coatings Technol. 372, 140–147 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.04.07110.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.04.071 ↗
31. M. Li, M.J. Mondrinos, X. Chen, M.R. Gandhi, F.K. Ko, P.I. Lelkes, Hydroxyapatite growth on anodic TiO2 nanotubes Hiroaki. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 79, 963–973 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a10.1002/jbm.a ↗
32. B. Luo, H. Yang, S. Liu, W. Fu, P. Sun, M. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Z. Liu, Fabrication and characterization of self-organized mixed oxide nanotube arrays by electrochemical anodization of Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Mater. Lett. 62, 4512–4515 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2008.08.01510.1016/j.matlet.2008.08.015 ↗
33. L. Mohan, C. Anandan, N. Rajendran, Electrochemical behaviour and bioactivity of self-organized TiO2 nanotube arrays on Ti-6Al-4V in Hanks’ solution for biomedical applications. Electrochim. Acta 155, 411–420 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.12.03210.1016/j.electacta.2014.12.032 ↗
34. K. Oh, K. Lee, J. Choi, Influence of geometry and crystal structures of TiO2 nanotubes on micro Vickers hardness. Mater. Lett. 192, 137–141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.12.04010.1016/j.matlet.2016.12.040 ↗
35. S.B. Patel, A. Hamlekhan, D. Royhman, A. Butt, J. Yuan, T. Shokuhfar, C. Sukotjo, M.T. Mathew, G. Jursich, C.G. Takoudis, Enhancing surface characteristics of Ti-6Al-4V for bio-implants using integrated anodization and thermal oxidation. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2, 3597–3608 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3tb21731k10.1039/c3tb21731k ↗
36. T. Guo, S. Ivanovski, K. Gulati, Optimizing titanium implant nano-engineering via anodization. Mater. Des. 223, 111110 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11111010.1016/j.matdes.2022.111110 ↗
37. Z. Zhang, Q. Wang, H. Xu, W. Zhang, Q. Zhou, H. Zeng, J. Yang, J. Zhu, X. Zhu, TiO2 nanotube arrays with a volume expansion factor greater than 20: evidence against the field-assisted ejection theory. Electrochem. Commun. 114, 106717 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2020.10671710.1016/j.elecom.2020.106717 ↗
38. A.C.C.A. Fontes, L. Sopchenski, C.A.H. Laurindo, R.D. Torres, K.C. Popat, P. Soares, Annealing temperature effect on tribocorrosion and biocompatibility properties of TiO2 nanotubes. J. Bio Tribo Corrosion. 6, 1–12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-020-00363-w10.1007/s40735-020-00363-w ↗
39. Z. Kazemian, M. Varzandeh, S. Labbaf, A facile synthesis of mono dispersed spherical silver doped bioactive glass nanoparticle. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 32, 1–6 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-021-06496-910.1007/s10856-021-06496-9 ↗
40. K.E. Shahrebabaki, S. Labbaf, F. Karimzadeh, M. Goli, M. Mirhaj, Alginate-gelatin based nanocomposite hydrogel scaffold incorporated with bioactive glass nanoparticles and fragmented nanofibers promote osteogenesis: from design to in vitro studies. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 282, 137104 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.13710410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137104 ↗
41. D. Bellucci, M. Bianchi, G. Graziani, A. Gambardella, M. Berni, A. Russo, V. Cannillo, Pulsed electron deposition of nanostructured bioactive glass coatings for biomedical applications. Ceram. Int. 43, 15862–15867 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.15910.1016/j.ceramint.2017.08.159 ↗
42. M. Sarraf, E. Zalnezhad, A.R. Bushroa, A.M.S. Hamouda, A.R. Rafieerad, B. Nasiri-Tabrizi, Effect of microstructural evolution on wettability and tribological behavior of TiO2 nanotubular arrays coated on Ti-6Al-4V. Ceram. Int. 41, 7952–7962 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.13610.1016/j.ceramint.2015.02.136 ↗
43. D. Valerini, L. Tammaro, R. Vitali, G. Guillot, A. Rinaldi, Sputter-deposited ag nanoparticles on electrospun pcl scaffolds: morphology, wettability and antibacterial activity. Coatings (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings1103034510.3390/coatings11030345 ↗
44. M. Li, M.J. Mondrinos, X. Chen, M.R. Gandhi, F.K. Ko, P.I. Lelkes, Elastin blends for tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A. 79, 963–973 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a10.1002/jbm.a ↗
45. C. Yao, E.B. Slamovich, T.J. Webster, Enhanced osteoblast functions on anodized titanium with nanotube-like structures. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 85, 157–166 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.3155110.1002/jbm.a.31551 ↗
46. I. Demetrescu, D. Ionita, C. Pirvu, D. Portan, Present and future trends in TiO2 nanotubes elaboration, characterization and potential applications. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 521, 195–203 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/1542140100371591810.1080/15421401003715918 ↗
47. T. Deng, X. Zhong, M. Zhong, Y. Lai, Z. Zhu, L. Zhang, O.A. Ojo, Effect of scandium on microstructure and corrosion resistance of Ti64 alloy in NaCl solution. Mater Charact 197, 112671 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2023.11267110.1016/j.matchar.2023.112671 ↗
48. R. Guo, J. Wen, Y. Gao, T. Li, Biomaterials effect of the adhesion of Ag coatings on the effectiveness and durability of antibacterial properties. J. Mater. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1939-z10.1007/s10853-017-1939-z ↗
49. J. Park, S. Bauer, K. Von Der Mark, P. Schmuki, Nanosize and vitality: TiO2 nanotube diameter directs cell fate. Nano Lett. 7, 1686–1691 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl070678d10.1021/nl070678d ↗
50. F. Moradi, F. Karimzadeh, M. Kharaziha, Rational micro/nano-structuring for high-performance triboelectric nanogenerator. J. Alloys Compd. 960, 170693 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.17069310.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170693 ↗
51. P. Krištofová, J. Kubásek, M. Roudnická, A. Michalcová, J. Suchý, D. Paloušek, D. Vojtěch, Structure and properties of additively manufactured We43 magnesium alloy. Met. Int. Conf. Metall. Mater. Conf. Proc. (2019). https://doi.org/10.37904/metal.2019.93610.37904/metal.2019.936 ↗