journal article·2019-03-28

A study on the constitutive equation of HC420LA steel subjected to high strain rates

Junjia Cui, Qiong Wang, Dongying Dong, Hao Jiang, Xu Zhang, Guangyao Li

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 34· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

In this paper, the influence of strain rate on the mechanical behavior of high-strength low-alloy (HC420LA) steel were studied. Quasi-static and dynamic tensile experiments were performed with strain rates ranging from 0.001 to 500 s−1at room temperature. The digital image correlation technique was used to obtain the full-field strain. The experimental results showed that HC420LA steel exhibited positive strain rate sensitivity. Based on experimental results, the modified Johnson–Cook (J–C) model was used to model the constitutive behavior of HC420LA steel. Predictions of the standard and modified J–C models were compared using standard statistical parameters. The modified J–C model showed better agreement with the experimental data. Then, numerical simulation of the representative tensile test at a strain rate of 100 s−1was performed using the finite element code LS-DYNA. Good correlation between the experimental and numerical simulation results was achieved.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.11910.1016/j.apsusc.2011.01.119 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.06810.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.068 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.064 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.25110.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.251 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.11.00410.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.11.004 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jare.2016.03.00510.1016/j.jare.2016.03.005 ↗
7. 10.1557/jmr.2015.5810.1557/jmr.2015.58 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.07.09110.1016/j.msea.2013.07.091 ↗
9. Quasi-static and dynamic responses of advanced high strength steels: Experiments and modeling
10. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.08.02110.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.08.021 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.01.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.01.004 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.102010.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.1020 ↗
13. Finite element analysis of AA1100 elasto-plastic behaviour using Johnson–Cook model10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.120 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.02510.1016/j.matdes.2016.10.025 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.08.08710.1016/j.msea.2012.08.087 ↗
16. 10.1557/jmr.2016.25110.1557/jmr.2016.251 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.00210.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.002 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.08.06110.1016/j.msea.2017.08.061 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.07810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.078 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.08.05710.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.08.057 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.06.01110.1016/j.jmapro.2017.06.011 ↗
22. Fields–Backofen and a modified Johnson–Cook model for CP-Ti at ambient and intermediate temperature10.1016/S1875-5372(17)30170-4 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.02710.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.027 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.02.03510.1016/j.msea.2016.02.035 ↗