journal article·2016-09-28

Effects of tensile elastic pre-deformation at different strain rates on the high-cycle fatigue behavior of SAE 1050 steel and fatigue life prediction

Zhenyu Zhu, Guangze Dai, Junwen Zhao, Hechuan Zhang, Lei Xu, Qingsong Zhang

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 31· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

A series of characterization tests were performed to elucidate the high-cycle fatigue (HCF) behavior in SAE 1050 steel subjected to tensile elastic pre-deformation at different strain rates. In the pre-strained stage, the deformation was maintained constant at 0.16%, which was close to the low yield point at strain rates ranging from 10−5s−1to 10−2s−1. Although pre-deformation occurred entirely in the elastic regime, using different pre-straining rates resulted in the occurrence of heterogeneous microscopic strain at different sites and locations during subsequent fatigue tests. It was found that the effect of pre-straining rate on crack initiation and crack propagation was not monotonous and was influenced by the homogeneity of deformation within grain boundaries, the integrity of the boundary structure, and the fracture toughness. In addition, the rough set theory model was introduced for the attribute reduction of characteristic parameters and provided a scientific basis to establish the fatigue model. The model was able to effectively predict the lifetime of the process of HCF in pre-strained steel. Hence, the pre-straining rate should be an important boundary condition in further studies.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0001-6160(60)90133-410.1016/0001-6160(60)90133-4 ↗
2. 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00223.x10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00223.x ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.03910.1016/j.msea.2009.03.039 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.00210.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.002 ↗
5. 10.1115/1.138139510.1115/1.1381395 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.04910.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.049 ↗
7. 10.1023/A:102034063246910.1023/A:1020340632469 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11661-015-3010-510.1007/s11661-015-3010-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.01810.1016/j.msea.2003.08.018 ↗
10. Application of FEM in assessments of phenomena associated with dynamic investigations on miniaturised DICT10.4149/km_2013_1_71 ↗
11. Dynamic Compression tests-current achievements and future development
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.02.02410.1016/j.msea.2007.02.024 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0264468510.1007/BF02644685 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.08710.1016/j.msea.2006.03.087 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00155.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.1995.tb00155.x ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0100195610.1007/BF01001956 ↗
17. Application of austenitic steels in energy absorbing structures
18. 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.06710.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.067 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.106510.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.1065 ↗
20. 10.1179/imr.1985.30.1.15710.1179/imr.1985.30.1.157 ↗
21. 10.1051/metal/201100210.1051/metal/2011002 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00050-010.1016/S0734-743X(99)00050-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.05310.1016/j.actamat.2014.04.053 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1006-706X(13)60126-010.1016/S1006-706X(13)60126-0 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.06.02110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.06.021 ↗
26. Sandor · 1972
27. 10.1016/0001-6160(61)90069-410.1016/0001-6160(61)90069-4 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.11.04710.1016/j.msea.2007.11.047 ↗
29. 10.1115/1.344313510.1115/1.3443135 ↗
30. 10.2355/isijinternational.37.117010.2355/isijinternational.37.1170 ↗
31. 10.1007/s12540-014-6007-510.1007/s12540-014-6007-5 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.06.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.06.011 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0278241210.1007/BF02782412 ↗
34. Wang · 2004
35. 10.1016/0022-5096(71)90009-310.1016/0022-5096(71)90009-3 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00828-510.1016/S0921-5093(00)00828-5 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.02.05310.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.02.053 ↗
38. 10.1080/1478643650822185210.1080/14786436508221852 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.10.01010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.10.010 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.03.02710.1016/j.msea.2010.03.027 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.14610.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.146 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00163-910.1016/S0921-5093(97)00163-9 ↗
43. 10.1016/S0167-8442(99)00021-X10.1016/S0167-8442(99)00021-X ↗
44. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.004 ↗
45. 10.1016/0001-6160(58)90060-910.1016/0001-6160(58)90060-9 ↗
46. 10.1080/21663831.2015.102964510.1080/21663831.2015.1029645 ↗
47. Models of fatigue crack initiation
48. 10.1111/j.1475-1305.2012.00847.x10.1111/j.1475-1305.2012.00847.x ↗
49. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.04710.1016/j.matdes.2014.12.047 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0167-6636(01)00105-310.1016/S0167-6636(01)00105-3 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.25550110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.255501 ↗
52. 10.1016/0142-1123(91)90482-E10.1016/0142-1123(91)90482-E ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.01.00910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.01.009 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2010.09.01110.1016/j.ijplas.2010.09.011 ↗
55. Zener · 1948 · 3
56. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00069-610.1016/S1359-6454(01)00069-6 ↗