Additively manufactured copper matrix composites: Heterogeneous microstructures and combined strengthening effects
Source abstract
Abstract
We here design and fabricate a new kind of copper matrix composites, where titanium carbide nanoparticles are in situ incorporated into and embedded within the copper matrix, by virtue of laser powder-bed-fusion (L-PBF) process. We made a multiscale examination on the microstructures of the additively manufactured samples, unraveling that there are many unusual microstructural features, including grain refinement, the existence of high-density dislocations, and supersaturation of titanium solute atoms in the as-printed metal matrix composites. These unique microstructural features are mainly interpreted by the intense thermal history and the rapid solidification nature of the L-PBF process. The resultant composites then integrate the most important four strengthening mechanisms in metals: grain boundary strengthening, dislocation strengthening, solid solution strengthening, and second-phase strengthening, rendering this new kind of copper matrix composites a remarkably high yield strength (~490 MPa) and large uniform elongation (~12%), surpassing many high-performance copper matrix composites and copper alloys.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. An overview of functionally graded additive manufacturing
2. 10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00024-310.1016/S0927-796X(00)00024-3 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.01.10510.1016/j.msea.2007.01.105 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00027-110.1016/S0109-5641(02)00027-1 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.01.03410.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.01.034 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.07.04010.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.07.040 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2011.06.010 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z ↗
9. The use of flake powder metallurgy to produce carbon nanotube (CNT)/aluminum composites with a homogenous CNT distribution10.1016/j.carbon.2011.12.057 ↗
10. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-10451110.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104511 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.01910.1016/j.actamat.2016.07.019 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2019.05.00910.1016/j.ijplas.2019.05.009 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0237510.1021/acs.nanolett.8b02375 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat502110.1038/nmat5021 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20130249510.1002/adma.201302495 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.07.02110.1016/j.msea.2016.07.021 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60016-410.1016/S1005-0302(12)60016-4 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00691-210.1016/S0022-3115(01)00691-2 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41586-019-1783-110.1038/s41586-019-1783-1 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0054444810.1007/BF00544448 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.02710.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.027 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20040193310.1002/adma.200401933 ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0349210.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03492 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.23310.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.233 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0267077510.1007/BF02670775 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.03.08810.1016/j.msea.2016.03.088 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.08010.1016/j.msea.2010.12.080 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0965-9773(99)00342-610.1016/S0965-9773(99)00342-6 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.004 ↗
30. 10.1038/nature1644510.1038/nature16445 ↗
31. 10.1557/JMR.2003.026710.1557/JMR.2003.0267 ↗