journal article·2015-11-27

Microstructural evolution and thermal stability of 1050 commercial pure aluminum processed by high-strain-rate deformation

Yang Yang, Ya Dong Chen, Hai Bo Hu, Tie Gang Tang, Ren Rong Long, Qing Ming Zhang

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 30· Issue 22
Publisher page

Abstract

Microstructural and property evolution of 1050 commercial pure aluminum subjected to high-strain-rate deformation (1.2–2.3 × 103s−1) by split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) and subsequent annealing treatment were investigated. The as-deformed and their annealed samples at 373–523 K were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and microhardness tests. TEM observations reveal that the as-deformed sample is mainly composed of a lamellar structure, whose transverse/longitudinal average subgrain/cell sizes are 293 and 694 nm, respectively. The initial coarse grains are refined significantly. The initial lamellar grain structures are subdivided into pancake-shaped subgrains due to a gradual transition by triple junction motion at 473 K, and then a dramatic microstructural coarsening is observed at 523 K. It is suggested that annealing behavior of this dynamic loading structure is better considered as a continuous process of grain coarsening or continuous recovery.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.03.02610.1016/j.msea.2005.03.026 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00282-810.1016/S1359-6462(02)00282-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.04010.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.040 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00229-810.1016/S1359-6454(98)00229-8 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11661-005-0109-010.1007/s11661-005-0109-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.03810.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.038 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.02810.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.028 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10853-008-2874-910.1007/s10853-008-2874-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.01710.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.017 ↗
10. Cahn · 1996 · III · 1869
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.11810.1016/j.msea.2014.03.118 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.02410.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.024 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.03910.1016/j.msea.2003.08.039 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.00610.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.006 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.04510.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.045 ↗
16. 10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/30210.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
17. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)00410-210.1016/0956-7151(94)00410-2 ↗
18. Hull · 1984 · 257
19. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00394-410.1016/S1359-6462(03)00394-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.07510.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.075 ↗
21. 10.1002/978047017227810.1002/9780470172278 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.030 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60017-010.1016/S1005-0302(11)60017-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.08510.1016/j.msea.2012.09.085 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.03510.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.035 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.02010.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.020 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.02010.1016/j.msea.2012.09.020 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.07710.1016/j.msea.2006.12.077 ↗