Microstructural evolution and thermal stability of 1050 commercial pure aluminum processed by high-strain-rate deformation
Source abstract
Abstract
Microstructural and property evolution of 1050 commercial pure aluminum subjected to high-strain-rate deformation (1.2–2.3 × 103s−1) by split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) and subsequent annealing treatment were investigated. The as-deformed and their annealed samples at 373–523 K were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and microhardness tests. TEM observations reveal that the as-deformed sample is mainly composed of a lamellar structure, whose transverse/longitudinal average subgrain/cell sizes are 293 and 694 nm, respectively. The initial coarse grains are refined significantly. The initial lamellar grain structures are subdivided into pancake-shaped subgrains due to a gradual transition by triple junction motion at 473 K, and then a dramatic microstructural coarsening is observed at 523 K. It is suggested that annealing behavior of this dynamic loading structure is better considered as a continuous process of grain coarsening or continuous recovery.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Surface Treatment and Residual Stress
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.03.02610.1016/j.msea.2005.03.026 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00282-810.1016/S1359-6462(02)00282-8 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.04010.1016/j.actamat.2013.07.040 ↗
4. 10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00229-810.1016/S1359-6454(98)00229-8 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11661-005-0109-010.1007/s11661-005-0109-0 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.03810.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.038 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.02810.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.028 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10853-008-2874-910.1007/s10853-008-2874-9 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.01710.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.017 ↗
10. Cahn · 1996 · III · 1869
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.11810.1016/j.msea.2014.03.118 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.02410.1016/j.actamat.2013.05.024 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2003.08.03910.1016/j.msea.2003.08.039 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.00610.1016/j.actamat.2005.07.006 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.04510.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.045 ↗
16. 10.1088/0370-1301/62/11/30210.1088/0370-1301/62/11/302 ↗
17. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)00410-210.1016/0956-7151(94)00410-2 ↗
18. Hull · 1984 · 257
19. 10.1016/S1359-6462(03)00394-410.1016/S1359-6462(03)00394-4 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.07510.1016/j.matdes.2013.06.075 ↗
21. 10.1002/978047017227810.1002/9780470172278 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.03010.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.01.030 ↗
23. 10.1016/S1005-0302(11)60017-010.1016/S1005-0302(11)60017-0 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.08510.1016/j.msea.2012.09.085 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.03510.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.035 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.02010.1016/j.actamat.2007.09.020 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.09.02010.1016/j.msea.2012.09.020 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.07710.1016/j.msea.2006.12.077 ↗