An investigation of fracture behaviors of NBG-18 nuclear graphite using in situ mechanical testing coupled with micro-CT
Source abstract
Abstract
Nuclear graphite contains defects spanning from nanoscale basal cracks to sub-mm scale voids. This study aims to establish an experimental method to investigate pre-existing defects and 3-D crack growth inside nuclear graphite, NBG-18. Three-point bending tests were performed on single-edge notched beam specimens with and without coupling with micro-CT. The fracture toughness was measured to be 1.17 ± 0.06 MPa(sqrt { ext{m}}). Cracks were observed to initiate from the pores and thermal cracks on the edge of the notch and then deflect or twist to grow along the pre-existing defects. Crack bridging, deflection, and twisting were the primary toughening mechanisms. The crack resistance curve exhibited a trend of rising-plateau-rising that can be related to the interaction of crack front and the pre-existing defects. The results highlight the capability of laboratory micro-CT-based experimental method for the visualization of multi-scale defect interactions, which remains to be a challenge in the characterization of nuclear graphite.Graphical abstract
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies · Nuclear and radioactivity studies · Nuclear Materials and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. T.R. Allen et al., Materials challenges for generation IV nuclear energy systems. Nucl Technol 162(3), 342–357 (2008). https://doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A396110.13182/NT08-A3961 ↗
2. K.L. Murty, I. Charit, Structural materials for Gen-IV nuclear reactors: challenges and opportunities. J. Nucl. Mater. 383(1–2), 189–195 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.04410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.08.044 ↗
3. J. Uhlíř, Chemistry and technology of molten salt reactors—history and perspectives. J. Nucl. Mater. 360(1), 6–11 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.08.00810.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.08.008 ↗
4. M.A. Fütterer et al., Status of the very high temperature reactor system. Prog. Nucl. Energy 77, 266–281 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2014.01.01310.1016/j.pnucene.2014.01.013 ↗
5. T.D. Burchell, L.L. Snead, The effect of neutron irradiation damage on the properties of grade NBG-10 graphite. J. Nucl. Mater. 371(1–3), 18–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.02110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.021 ↗
6. T.D. Burchell, 2.10 graphite: properties and characteristics, in Comprehensive Nuclear Materials, vol. 2, ed. by R. Konings (Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, 2012), pp.285–30510.1016/B978-0-08-056033-5.00020-3 ↗
7. Y. Zhu et al., Pore structure of nuclear graphite obtained via synchrotron computed tomography. J. Nondestr. Eval. 39(1), 1–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-020-0659-510.1007/s10921-020-0659-5 ↗
8. J.D. Arregui-Mena, P.D. Edmondson, A.A. Campbell, Y. Katoh, Site specific, high-resolution characterisation of porosity in graphite using FIB-SEM tomography. J. Nucl. Mater. 511, 164–173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.08.04710.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.08.047 ↗
9. J. Kane, C. Karthik, D.P. Butt, W.E. Windes, R. Ubic, Microstructural characterization and pore structure analysis of nuclear graphite. J. Nucl. Mater. 415(2), 189–197 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.05310.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.053 ↗
10. S.P. Jing et al., (2016) 3D microstructures of nuclear graphite: IG-110, NBG-18 and NG-CT-10. Nucl. Sci. Tech. 27(3), 66 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0071-010.1007/s41365-016-0071-0 ↗
11. J.H. Yoon, T.S. Byun, J.P. Strizak, L.L. Snead, Characterization of tensile strength and fracture toughness of nuclear graphite NBG-18 using subsize specimens. J. Nucl. Mater. 412(3), 315–320 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.03.01910.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.03.019 ↗
12. H. Li, J. Li, G. Singh, A. Fok, Fracture behavior of nuclear graphite NBG-18. Carbon N Y 60, 46–56 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.05510.1016/j.carbon.2013.03.055 ↗
13. B.E. Mironov et al., Electron irradiation of nuclear graphite studied by transmission electron microscopy and electron energy loss spectroscopy. Carbon N Y 83, 106–117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.01910.1016/j.carbon.2014.11.019 ↗
14. D. Liu, P.E.J. Flewitt, Deformation and fracture of carbonaceous materials using in situ micro-mechanical testing. Carbon N Y 114, 261–274 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.08410.1016/j.carbon.2016.11.084 ↗
15. J.D. Arregui-Mena et al., Characterisation of the spatial variability of material properties of Gilsocarbon and NBG-18 using random fields. J. Nucl. Mater. 511, 91–108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.09.00810.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.09.008 ↗
16. J.D. Arregui-Mena et al., Multiscale characterization and comparison of historical and modern nuclear graphite grades. Mater. Charact. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2022.11204710.1016/j.matchar.2022.112047 ↗
17. K. Shen, X. Zhang, S. Yu, F. Kang, Characterization of heterogeneity in NBG-18 nuclear graphite microstructure by correlative analysis of optical texture and focused ion beam transmission electron microscopy observations. Carbon N Y 189, 604–616 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.03510.1016/j.carbon.2021.12.035 ↗
18. K. Shen, K. Xu, S. Yu, F. Kang, The optical texture of PGA, Gilsocarbon, NBG-18, and IG-110 nuclear graphite. J. Nucl. Mater. 552, 153013 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.15301310.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153013 ↗
19. D.J. Bull, L. Helfen, I. Sinclair, S.M. Spearing, T. Baumbach, A comparison of multi-scale 3D X-ray tomographic inspection techniques for assessing carbon fibre composite impact damage. Compos. Sci. Technol. 75, 55–61 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.12.00610.1016/j.compscitech.2012.12.006 ↗
20. J. Wade-Zhu et al., 4D synchrotron X-ray microtomography of fracture in nuclear graphite after neutron irradiation and radiolytic oxidation. Carbon N Y 168, 230–244 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.05110.1016/j.carbon.2020.06.051 ↗
21. A. Hodgkins, T.J. Marrow, P. Mummery, B. Marsden, A. Fok, X-ray tomography observation of crack propagation in nuclear graphite. Mater. Sci. Technol. 22(9), 1045–1051 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1179/174328406X11412610.1179/174328406X114126 ↗
22. Z. Li, D. Liu, Y. Cai, P.G. Ranjith, Y. Yao, Multi-scale quantitative characterization of 3-D pore-fracture networks in bituminous and anthracite coals using FIB-SEM tomography and X-ray Μ-CT. Fuel 209, 43–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.08810.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.088 ↗
23. Y. Tang, K. Su, R. Man, M.C. Hillman, J. Du, Investigation of internal cracks in epoxy-alumina using in situ mechanical testing coupled with micro-CT. JOM 73(8), 2452–2459 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-021-04714-x10.1007/s11837-021-04714-x ↗
24. K.Y. Wen, T.J. Marrow, B.J. Marsden, The microstructure of nuclear graphite binders. Carbon N Y 46(1), 62–71 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.10.02510.1016/j.carbon.2007.10.025 ↗
25. Standard Test Method for Determination of Fracture Toughness of Graphite at Ambient Temperature. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7779-2010.1520/D7779-20 ↗
26. S.H. Chi, Comparison of fracture toughness (KIC) and strain energy release rate (G) of selected nuclear graphites. J. Nucl. Mater. 476, 188–197 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.04010.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.04.040 ↗
27. T. Yamada et al., Evaluation of fracture toughness of fine-grained isotropic graphites for HTGR. Nucl. Eng. Des. 271, 323–326 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.11.05510.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.11.055 ↗
28. ORNL/TM-2007/153 NGNP Graphite Selection and Acquisition Strategy, 2007. http://www.osti.gov/contact.html
29. M.R. Joyce, T.J. Marrow, P. Mummery, B.J. Marsden, Observation of microstructure deformation and damage in nuclear graphite. Eng. Fract. Mech. 75(12), 3633–3645 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.00310.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.11.003 ↗
30. R. Moskovic, P.J. Heard, P.E.J. Flewitt, M.R. Wootton, Overview of strength, crack propagation and fracture of nuclear reactor moderator graphite. Nucl. Eng. Des. 263, 431–442 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.05.01110.1016/j.nucengdes.2013.05.011 ↗
31. T.H. Becker, T.J. Marrow, R.B. Tait, Damage, crack growth and fracture characteristics of nuclear grade graphite using the Double Torsion technique. J. Nucl. Mater. 414(1), 32–43 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.05810.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.058 ↗
32. P. Ouagne, G.B. Neighbour, B. Mcenaney, Crack growth resistance in nuclear graphites. J. Phys. D 35(9), 927 (2002)10.1088/0022-3727/35/9/315 ↗
33. S. Lai, L. Shi, A. Fok, H. Li, L. Sun, Z. Zhang, A new method to measure crack extension in nuclear graphite based on digital image correlation. Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/241654510.1155/2017/2416545 ↗
34. Z.Q. Feng et al., In-situ TEM investigation of fracture process in an Al-Cu-Mg alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 586, 259–266 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.08.01310.1016/j.msea.2013.08.013 ↗