journal article·2023-01-28

New iron-containing MFI-type zeolites in the catalytic conversion of ethanol, propane, and N2O

Asiya A. Gainanova, Galina M. Kuz’micheva, Larisa V. Pirutko, Anna I. Zhukova, Quang K. Nguyen, Anton G. Mushtakov, Aliya R. Alimguzina, Ekaterina B. Markova, Leonid Kustov, Aleksandr L. Kustov, Yuriy A. Fionov, Roman D. Svetogorov, Evgeniy V. Khramov, Aleksandra V. Koroleva

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 38· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

For the first time, two groups of iron-containing zeolites (MFI type) of general compositions (Hx)[Fex3+Si12−x4+O24] (FeHZSM-5, module Si/Fe = 34; hydrothermal method) and Fe2O3/(Hx)[Al3+xSi4+12−xO24] × wH2O with the Fe2O3 polycrystalline initial content 10, 35, 50 wt%. (Fe2O3/AlHZSM-5, Si/Al = 12, 25, 40; precipitation from the solutions and gas phase) were synthesized and studied. It was found (XRD, EXAFS/XANES, XPS, FTIR spectroscopies) that FeHZSM-5 and Fe2O3/AlHZSM-5 differ in surface compositions, the oxygen environment around Fe3+ ions, and the iron oxide state. Amorphous or nanocrystallized iron oxide phases uniformly distributed over the zeolite particles surface with the formation of Fe–O–H–O–Si(Al) bonds. In the reaction of ethanol, propane, and N2O conversion composites, Fe2O3/AlHZSM-5 are more active than FeHZSM-5 in the low-temperature region. The conversion degree of ethanol, propane, and N2O is suppressed with an increase in the zeolite module Si/Al, the initial Fe2O3 content, and when replacing nanosized Fe2O3 with the amorphous one in the composites.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis · Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. W. Zhang, B. Wang, J. Yang, P. Rui, N. Fan, W. Liao, X. Shu, Zeolite Fe-MFI as catalysts in the selective liquid-phase dehydration of 1-phenylethanol. Catal. Commun. 110, 97–101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2018.03.01810.1016/j.catcom.2018.03.018 ↗
2. Y. Lai, G. Veser, The nature of the selective species in Fe-HZSM-5 for non-oxidative methane dehydroaromatization. Catal. Sci. Technol. 6(14), 5440–5452 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cy02258d10.1039/c5cy02258d ↗
3. J. Pérez-Ramírez, G. Mul, F. Kapteijn, J. Moulijn, A. Overweg, A. Doménech, A. Ribera, I. Arends, Physicochemical characterization of isomorphously substituted FeZSM-5 during activation. J. Catal. 207(1), 113–126 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.351110.1006/jcat.2002.3511 ↗
4. P.R. Anizelli, J.P.T. Baú, D.F. Valezi, L.C. Canton, C.E.A. Carneiro, E. Di Mauro, D.A.M. Zaia, Adenine interaction with and adsorption on Fe-ZSM-5 zeolites: a prebiotic chemistry study using different techniques. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 226, 493–504 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2016.02.00410.1016/j.micromeso.2016.02.004 ↗
5. S.A. Axon, K.K. Fox, S.W. Carr, J. Klinowski, EXAFS studies of iron-substituted zeolite ZSM-5. Chem. Phys. Lett. 189(1), 1–6 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(92)85143-X10.1016/0009-2614(92)85143-X ↗
6. S.H. Choi, B.R. Wood, A.T. Bell, M.T. Janicke, K.C. Ott, X-ray absorption fine structure analysis of the local environment of Fe in Fe/Al-MFI. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108, 8970–8975 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp040065e10.1021/jp040065e ↗
7. F. Heinrich, C. Schmidt, E. Loffler, M. Menzel, W. Grunert, Fe–ZSM-5 catalysts for the selective reduction of NO by isobutane—the problem of the active sites. J. Catalysis 212, 157–172 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.2002.377510.1006/jcat.2002.3775 ↗
8. E.A. Urquieta-González, L. Martins, R.P.S. Peguin, M.S. Batista, Identification of extra-framework species on Fe/ZSM-5 and Cu/ZSM-5 catalysts typical microporous molecular sieves with zeolitic structure. Mater. Res. 5(3), 321–327 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-1439200200030001710.1590/S1516-14392002000300017 ↗
9. J.S. de Oliveira, M.A. Mazutti, E.A. Urquieta-González, E.L. Foletto, S.L. Jahn, Preparation of mesoporous Fe2O3-supported ZSM-5 zeolites by carbon-templating and their evaluation as photo-fenton catalysts to degrade organic pollutant. Mater. Res. 19(6), 1399–1406 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-036710.1590/1980-5373-MR-2016-0367 ↗
10. X. Yang, X. Cheng, A.A. Elzatahry, J. Chen, A. Alghamdi, Y. Deng, Recyclable Fenton-like catalyst based on zeolite Y supported ultrafine, highly-dispersed Fe2O3 nanoparticles for removal of organics under mild conditions. Chin. Chem. Lett. 20, 324–330 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2018.06.02610.1016/j.cclet.2018.06.026 ↗
11. P. Baile, L. Vidal, M.A. Aguirre, A. Canals, A modified ZSM-5 zeolite/Fe2O3 composite as sorbent for magnetic dispersive solid-phase microextraction of cadmium, mercury and lead from urine samples prior to inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 33, 856–866 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7JA00366H10.1039/C7JA00366H ↗
12. M.S. Batista, M. Wallau, E.A. Urquieta-González, Species active in the selective catalytic reduction of NO with Iso-butane on Iron-exchanged ZSM-5 zeolites. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 22(3), 341–351 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-6632200500030000310.1590/S0104-66322005000300003 ↗
13. N. Richards, E. Nowicka, J.H. Carter, D.J. Morgan, N.F. Dummer, S. Golunski, G.J. Hutchings, Investigating the influence of Fe speciation on N2O decomposition over Fe–ZSM-5 catalysts. Top. Catal. 61(18), 1983–1992 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-018-1024-010.1007/s11244-018-1024-0 ↗
14. K. Jíša, J. Nováková, M. Schwarze, A. Vondrová, S. Sklenák, Z. Sobalik, Role of the Fe-zeolite structure and iron state in the N2O decomposition: comparison of Fe-FER, Fe-BEA, and Fe-MFI catalysts. J. Catal. 262(1), 27–34 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2008.11.02510.1016/j.jcat.2008.11.025 ↗
15. J. Lu, Y. Liu, N. Li, Fe-modified HZSM-5 catalysts for ethanol conversion into light olefins. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 20(4), 423–427 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1003-9953(10)60193-410.1016/s1003-9953(10)60193-4 ↗
16. Y.K. Chow, N.F. Dummer, J.H. Carter, C. Williams, G. Shaw, D.J. Willock, G.J. Hutchings, Investigating the influence of acid sites in continuous methane oxidation with N2O over Fe/MFI zeolites. Catal. Sci. Technol. 8(1), 154–163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cy01769c10.1039/c7cy01769c ↗
17. G.M. Kuz’micheva, R.D. Svetogorov, E.V. Khramov, G.V. Kravchenko, L.G. Bruk, ZYu. Pastukhova, E.B. Markova, A.I. Zhukova, S.G. Chuklina, A.V. Dorokhov, Titanosilicalites (MFI-type): composition, statistical and local structure, catalytic properties. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 326, 111377–111391 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2021.11137710.1016/j.micromeso.2021.111377 ↗
18. G.M. Kuz’micheva, E.N. Domoroshchina, G.V. Kravchenko, Design of MFI type aluminum- and titanium-containing zeolites (review). Crystals 11(11), 1451–1500 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst1112145110.3390/cryst11121451 ↗
19. M.M.J. Treacy, J.B. Higgins, Collection of Simulated XRD Powder Patterns for Zeolites, 4th edn. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001)
20. T.E. Westre, P. Kennepohl, J.G. DeWitt, B. Hedman, K.O. Hodgson, E.I. Solomon, A multiplet analysis of Fe K-edge 1s → 3d pre-edge features of iron complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119(27), 6297–6314 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja964352a10.1021/ja964352a ↗
21. A.L. Roe, D.J. Schneider, R.J. Mayer, J.W. Pyrz, J. Widom, L. Que, X-ray absorption spectroscopy of iron-tyrosinate proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106(6), 1676–1681 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00318a02110.1021/ja00318a021 ↗
22. S. Bordiga, R. Buzzoni, F. Geobaldo, C. Lamberti, E. Giamello, A. Zecchina et al., Structure and reactivity of framework and extraframework iron in Fe-silicalite as investigated by spectroscopic and physicochemical methods. J. Catal 158(2), 486–501 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1996.004810.1006/jcat.1996.0048 ↗
23. T. Yamamoto, Assignment of pre-edge peaks in K-edge x-ray absorption spectra of 3d transition metal compounds: electric dipole or quadrupole? X-Ray Spectrom. 37(6), 572–584 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.110310.1002/xrs.1103 ↗
24. L. Schöttner, A. Nefedov, C. Yang, S. Heissler, Y. Wang, C. Wöll, Structural evolution of α-Fe2O3 (0001) surfaces under reduction conditions monitored by infrared spectroscopy. Front. Chem. 7, 451 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.0045110.3389/fchem.2019.00451 ↗
25. G.D. Pirngruber, P.K. Roy, N. Weiher, An in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy study of N2O decomposition over Fe-ZSM-5 prepared by chemical vapor deposition of FeCl3. J. Phys. Chem. B 108(36), 13746–13754 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp048346+10.1021/jp048346+ ↗
26. A.A. Battiston, J.H. Bitter, F.M.F. de Groot, A.R. Overweg, O. Stephan, J.A. van Bokhoven, P.J. Kooyman, C. van der Spek, G. Vankó, D.C. Koningsberger, Evolution of Fe species during the synthesis of over-exchanged Fe/ZSM-5 obtained by chemical vapor deposition of FeCl3. J. Catal. 213(2), 251–271 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9517(02)00051-910.1016/S0021-9517(02)00051-9 ↗
27. A. Boubnov, H.W.P. Carvalho, D.E. Doronkin, T. Günter, E. Gallo, A.J. Atkins et al., Selective catalytic reduction of NO over Fe-ZSM-5: mechanistic insights by Operando HERFD-XANES and valence-to-core x-ray emission spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136(37), 13006–13015 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja506250510.1021/ja5062505 ↗
28. NIST X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) Database, Version 3.5
29. G.M. Kuz’micheva, E.N. Domoroshchina, Composition, structure and properties of zeolites HZSM-5 and composites based on them with functional nanosized anatase (Review). Materials. Manuscript ID: materials-1075763
30. S. Sobhanardakani, A. Jafari, R. Zandipak, A. Meidanchi, Removal of heavy metal (Hg(II) and Cr(VI)) ions from aqueous solutions using Fe2O3@SiO2 thin films as a novel adsorbent. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 120, 348–357 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.10.00210.1016/j.psep.2018.10.002 ↗
31. L. Shirazi, E. Jamshidi, M.R. Ghasemi, The effect of Si/Al ratio of ZSM-5 zeolite on its morphology, acidity and crystal size. Cryst. Res. Technol. 43(12), 1300–1306 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.20080014910.1002/crat.200800149 ↗
32. W. Wu, Q. He, C. Jiang, Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: synthesis and surface functionalization strategies. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 3, 397 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11671-008-9174-910.1007/s11671-008-9174-9 ↗
33. G. Giecko, T. Borowiecki, W. Gac, J. Kruk, Fe2O3/Al2O3 catalysts for the N2O decomposition in the nitric acid industry. Catal. Today 137(2–4), 403–409 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2008.02.00810.1016/j.cattod.2008.02.008 ↗
34. A. Abdelkader, H. Daly, Y. Saih, K. Morgan, M.A. Mohamed, S.A. Halawy, C. Hardacre, Steam reforming of ethanol over Co3O4–Fe2O3 mixed oxides. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38(20), 8263–8275 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.00910.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.04.009 ↗
35. Y. Yang, H. Zhang, Y. Yan, The preparation of Fe2O3-ZSM-5 catalysts by metal-organic chemical vapour deposition method for catalytic wet peroxide oxidation of m-cresol. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5(3), 171731–171745 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.17173110.1098/rsos.171731 ↗
36. R. Svetogorov, P. Dorovatovskii, V. Lazarenko, Belok/XSA diffraction beamline for studying crystalline samples at Kurchatov synchrotron radiation Source. Cryst. Res. Technol 55(5), 1900184 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.20190018410.1002/crat.201900184 ↗
37. V. Petricek, M. Dusek, L. Palatinus, Crystallographic computing system JANA2006: general features. Z. Kristallogr. 229(5), 345–352 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2014-173710.1515/zkri-2014-1737 ↗
38. D.H. Olson, G.T. Kokotailo, S.L. Lawton, W.M. Meier, Crystal-structure and structure-related properties of ZSM-5. J. Phys. Chem. 85(15), 2238–2243 (1981)10.1021/j150615a020 ↗
39. A.I. Zhukova, S.G. Chuklina, S.A. Maslenkova, Study of Cu modified Zr and Al mixed oxides in ethanol conversion: the structure-catalytic activity relationship. Catal. Today 379, 159–165 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2021.02.01510.1016/j.cattod.2021.02.015 ↗