Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams with Different Layouts under Seismic and Wind Loads
Source abstract
Abstract
First Name is required invalid characters Last Name is required invalid characters Email Address is required Invalid Email Address Please select a country... Afghanistan Åland Islands Albania Algeria American Samoa Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua And Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Antarctic Territory British Indian Ocean Territory British Overseas Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cabo Verde Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guam Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City) Honduras Hong Kong Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea (the Republic of) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Kosovo, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macau Macedonia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway Oman Pakistan Palau Palestine, State of Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Puerto Rico Qatar Réunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Kitts And Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Samoa San Marino Sao Tome And Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka St Vincent And Grenadines St. Helena Ascensian and Tristan da Aunh Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad And Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks And Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States United States Minor Outlying Islands Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela Viet Nam Virgin Islands (British) Virgin Islands (U.S.) Wallis And Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe Country/Territory is required
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis · Seismic Performance and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Abdullah, S. A.; Aswegan, K.; Jaberansari, S.; Klemencic, R.; and Wallace, J. W., 2020a, “Performance of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams Subjected to Simulated Wind Loading,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 3, May, pp. 283-295.10.14359/51729356 ↗
2. Abdullah, S. A.; Wallace, J. W.; Aswegan, K.; and Klemencic, R., 2020b, “Experimental Study of Concrete Coupling Beams Subjected to Wind and Seismic Loading Protocols,” Final Report, UCLA/SEERL 2020/01, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 276 pp.10.14359/51729356 ↗
3. ACI Committee 318, 2019, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19) and Commentary (ACI 318R-19) (Reapproved 2022),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 624 pp.
4. ACI Committee 374, 2013, “Guide for Testing Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements under Slowly Applied Simulated Seismic Loads (ACI 374.2R-13),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 18 pp.
5. Alinejad, H., and Kang, T. H.-K., 2020, “Engineering Review of ASCE 7-16 Wind-Load Provisions and Wind Effect on Tall Concrete-Frame Buildings,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 146, No. 6, June, p. 04020100. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000262210.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002622 ↗
6. Alinejad, H.; Jeong, S. Y.; and Kang, T. H.-K., 2020b, “Performance-Based Design of Tall Buildings for Wind Load and Application of Response Modification Factor,” Wind and Structures, V. 31, No. 2, pp. 153-164.
7. Alinejad, H.; Kang, T. H.-K.; and Jeong, S. Y., 2021, “Performance-Based Wind Design Framework Proposal for Tall Buildings,” Wind and Structures, V. 32, No. 4, Apr., pp. 283-292.
8. ASCE/SEI, 2019, “Prestandard for Performance-Based Wind Design,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
9. ASCE/SEI 7-16, 2017, “Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
10. ASCE/SEI 7-22, 2022, “Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
11. ASCE/SEI 41-17, 2017b, “Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings,” American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.
12. Aswegan, K.; Larsen, R.; Klemencic, R.; Hooper, J.; and Hasselbauer, J., 2017, “Performance-Based Wind and Seismic Engineering: Benefits of Considering Multiple Hazards,” Structures Congress 2017: Buildings and Special Structures, J. G. Soules, ed., Denver, CO, pp. 473-484.10.1061/9780784480410.039 ↗
13. Barney, G. B.; Shiu, K. N.; Rabbat, B. G.; Fiorato, A. E.; Russell, H. G.; and Corley, W. G., 1980, “Behavior of Coupling Beams under Load Reversals (RD068.01B),” Portland Cement Association, Skokie, IL, 25 pp.
14. Breña, S. F., and Ihtiyar, O., 2011, “Performance of Conventionally Reinforced Coupling Beams Subjected to Cyclic Loading,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 137, No. 6, June, pp. 665-676. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000031610.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000316 ↗
15. Cheng, M.-Y.; Gitomarsono, J.; and Zeng, H.-Y., 2019, “Cyclic Test of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beam with Different Shear Demand,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 116, No. 6, Nov., pp. 241-250. doi: 10.14359/5171801010.14359/51718010 ↗
16. Fortney, P. J.; Rassati, G. A.; and Shahrooz, B. M., 2008, “Investigation on Effect of Transverse Reinforcement on Performance of Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 105, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 781-788.10.14359/20106 ↗
17. Galano, L., and Vignoli, A., 2000, “Seismic Behavior of Short Coupling Beams with Different Reinforcement Layouts,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 97, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 876-885.10.14359/9633 ↗
18. Han, S. W.; Kim, S. B.; and Kim, T., 2019, “Effect of Transverse Reinforcement on the Seismic Behavior of Diagonally Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams,” Engineering Structures, V. 196, Oct., Article No. 109307. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.10930710.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109307 ↗
19. Jeong, S. Y.; Alinejad, H.; and Kang, T. H.-K., 2021, “Performance-Based Wind Design of High-Rise Buildings Using Generated Time-History Wind Loads,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 147, No. 9, p. 04021134.10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0003077 ↗
20. Kanakubo, T.; Fujisawa, M.; Sako, N.; and Sonobe, Y., 1996, “Ductility of Short Span RC Beams,” Proceedings, Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (11 WCEE), Acapulco, Mexico, Paper No. 1369, pp. 1-8.
21. KBC, 2016, “Korean Building Code (KBC 2016),” Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Seoul, South Korea.
22. Kwan, A. K. H., and Zhao, Z. Z., 2002, “Testing of Coupling Beams with Equal End Rotations Maintained and Local Joint Deformation Allowed,” Structures and Buildings, V. 152, No. 1, pp. 67-78.10.1680/stbu.152.1.67.40880 ↗
23. Lequesne, R. D., 2011, “Behavior and Design of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams and Coupled-Wall Systems,” PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 298 pp.
24. Lequesne, R. D.; Parra-Montesinos, G. J.; and Wight, J. K., 2013, “Seismic Behavior and Detailing of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams and Coupled Wall Systems,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, V. 139, No. 8, pp. 1362-1370. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.000068710.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000687 ↗
25. Lim, E.; Hwang, S.-J.; Cheng, C.-H.; and Lin, P.-Y., 2016b, “Cyclic Tests of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beam with Intermediate Span-Depth Ratio,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 3, May-June, pp. 515-524. doi: 10.14359/5168847310.14359/51688473 ↗
26. Lim, E.; Hwang, S.-J.; Wang, T.-W.; and Chang, Y.-H., 2016a, “An Investigation on the Seismic Behavior of Deep Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 113, No. 2, Mar.-Apr., pp. 217-226. doi: 10.14359/5168793910.14359/51687939 ↗
27. Naish, D.; Fry, A.; Klemencic, R.; and Wallace, J., 2013, “Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams—Part I: Testing,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 110, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 1057-1066.10.14359/51686160 ↗
28. Park, W.-S.; Kang, T. H.-K.; Kim, S.; and Yun, H.-D., 2020, “Seismic Performance of Moderately Short Concrete Coupling Beams with Various Reinforcements,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 117, No. 3, May, pp. 141-154.10.14359/51723501 ↗
29. Paulay, T., and Binney, J. R., 1974, “Diagonally Reinforced Coupling Beams of Shear Walls,” Shear in Reinforced Concrete, SP-42, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, pp. 579-598.
30. PEER/ATC-72-1, 2010, “Modeling and Acceptance Criteria for Seismic Design and Analysis of Tall Buildings,” Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER)/Applied Technology Council (ATC), Berkeley, CA, 242 pp.
31. Shimazaki, K., 2004, “De-bonded Diagonally Reinforced Beam for Good Repairability,” Proceedings, Thirteenth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (13 WCEE), Vancouver, BC, Canada, Paper No. 3173, pp. 1-14.
32. Tassios, T. P.; Moretti, M.; and Bezas, A., 1996, “On the Behavior and Ductility of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams of Shear Walls,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 93, No. 6, Nov.-Dec., pp. 711-720.10.14359/518 ↗
33. TBI, 2017, “Guidelines for Performance-Based Seismic Design of Tall Buildings,” Tall Buildings Initiative, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, CA.
34. Vu, N. S.; Li, B.; and Beyer, K., 2014, “Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Coupling Beams,” Engineering Structures, V. 76, Oct., pp. 371-382.10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.014 ↗
35. Xiao, Y.; Esmaeily-Ghasemabadi, A.; and Wu, H., 1999, “High-Strength Concrete Short Beams Subjected to Cyclic Shear,” ACI Structural Journal, V. 96, No. 3, May-June, pp. 392-400.10.14359/673 ↗