A comparative study of calcium–magnesium–aluminum–silicon oxide mitigation in selected self-healing thermal barrier coating ceramics
Source abstract
Abstract
The mitigation of CMAS (calcium–magnesium–aluminum–silicon oxide) infiltration is a major requirement for the stability of thermal barrier coatings. In this study, yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ)–Al2O3–SiC, YSZ–Al2O3–Ta2O5, and YSZ–Al2O3–Nb2O5self-healing composites produced by uniaxially pressing powders were investigated as an alternative to YSZ. CMAS infiltration in these materials was tested at 1250 °C for 10 h. Comparing the depth of CMAS infiltration using scanning electron microscope (SEM) in tandem with electron-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), all self-healing materials were found to perform better than the reference materials. While standard YSZ shows massive CMAS infiltration, SEM micrographs and EDS maps revealed a 33-fold improvement in CMAS resistance for the YSZ–Al2O3–Nb2O5system, which exhibited the best performance among the selected self-repairing materials. X-ray diffraction and high-resolution SEM micrographs taken 10 μm below the surface revealed that CMAS only infiltrated pores in the topmost region of the samples. Both YSZ–Al2O3–Ta2O5and YSZ–Al2O3–Nb2O5systems showed no signs of chemical reaction with CMAS.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.partic.2016.01.00710.1016/j.partic.2016.01.007 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.27110.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.271 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.06110.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.061 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.04510.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.06.045 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41598-017-17942-610.1038/s41598-017-17942-6 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.00210.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.03.002 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.05410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.04.054 ↗
8. 10.1016/S1369-7021(05)70934-210.1016/S1369-7021(05)70934-2 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2009.02373.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2009.02373.x ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.07.03210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.07.032 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.08.07810.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.08.078 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.06.06610.1016/j.matlet.2018.06.066 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.05.01510.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.05.015 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.03.02710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.03.027 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tsf.2019.13748110.1016/j.tsf.2019.137481 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.08.07910.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.08.079 ↗
17. 10.1111/jace.1646510.1111/jace.16465 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.05.08910.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.05.089 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.13510.1016/j.ceramint.2018.12.135 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01209.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01209.x ↗
21. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.03.00910.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.03.009 ↗
22. Advances on strategies for searching for next generation thermal barrier coating materials
23. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.08.00210.1016/j.jmrt.2018.08.002 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20100478310.1002/adma.201004783 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.22510.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.225 ↗
26. Densification behavior and mechanical properties of niobium-oxide-doped alumina ceramics
27. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.03210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.03.032 ↗
28. 10.1116/6.000035010.1116/6.0000350 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.08.05510.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.08.055 ↗
30. Phase diagram for ceramists
31. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.10710.1016/j.ceramint.2017.05.107 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.12.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.12.028 ↗