journal article·2018-09-14

Anisotropic compressive properties and energy absorption of metal–resin interpenetrating phase composites

Bibo Yao, Zhaoyao Zhou, Liuyang Duan

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 33· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Metal–resin interpenetrating phase composites (IPCs) have been produced by spontaneously infiltrating unsaturated polyester resin into porous stainless steel fibrous preforms under vacuum conditions. The compressive behaviors of the IPCs were investigated and the fractures were examined. The compressive strength and elastic modulus increase with increasing fiber fraction. The structures, compressive behaviors, and energy absorption capacities of the IPCs exhibit anisotropy. A higher compressive strength, lower elastic modulus, and lower energy absorption efficiency are observed in the through-thickness direction. The energy absorption efficiency slightly decreases with increasing fiber fraction in a certain range rather than monotonically increasing or decreasing. The energy absorption efficiency in the in-plane direction is superior to that in the through-thickness direction. Finer fibers improve the strength and elastic modulus but have little influence on the energy absorption efficiency. Resin collapse, fiber necking, and debonding are the main failure types observed in the composites.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Material Properties and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0020-7403(99)00026-010.1016/S0020-7403(99)00026-0 ↗
2. 10.1016/S1003-6326(06)60229-X10.1016/S1003-6326(06)60229-X ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.12.08910.1016/j.msea.2006.12.089 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.01.06610.1016/j.msea.2010.01.066 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.07310.1016/j.apenergy.2012.01.073 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.11.00410.1016/j.matdes.2008.11.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.02310.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.023 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.02210.1016/j.msea.2009.07.022 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.tca.2006.01.01710.1016/j.tca.2006.01.017 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.11.09210.1016/j.matlet.2005.11.092 ↗
11. 10.1557/jmr.2010.027210.1557/jmr.2010.0272 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.08810.1016/j.matdes.2013.10.088 ↗
13. 10.1080/10426914.2015.101911510.1080/10426914.2015.1019115 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matlet.2007.06.03210.1016/j.matlet.2007.06.032 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.00910.1016/j.compositesb.2014.04.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0020-7403(00)00035-710.1016/S0020-7403(00)00035-7 ↗
17. 10.1007/BF0113012810.1007/BF01130128 ↗
18. 10.1002/adem.20170066910.1002/adem.201700669 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0261-3069(00)00018-210.1016/S0261-3069(00)00018-2 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.06910.1016/j.jallcom.2008.09.069 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2014.05.00110.1016/j.ijplas.2014.05.001 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.18010.1016/j.jallcom.2017.07.180 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0020-7403(01)00016-910.1016/S0020-7403(01)00016-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.00210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.00210.1016/j.matdes.2012.05.002 ↗
26. Aluminium foam–polymer composites: Processing and characteristics
27. 10.1016/1359-6454(95)00138-810.1016/1359-6454(95)00138-8 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.04210.1016/j.msea.2008.09.042 ↗
29. 10.1002/srin.20150047510.1002/srin.201500475 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.09.06310.1016/j.msea.2009.09.063 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.02.07110.1016/j.msea.2010.02.071 ↗
32. 10.1002/adem.20110001810.1002/adem.201100018 ↗