A comparative study on constitutive equations and artificial neural network model to predict high-temperature deformation behavior in Nitinol 60 shape memory alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
The present study was conducted to predict the hot deformation behavior of the as-forged Nitinol 60 shape memory alloy by using the Arrhenius type, multiple-linear, and artificial neural network (ANN) models. The acquired flow stress data from isothermal hot compression tests in a temperature range of 650–850 °C under strain rate range of 0.01–1 s−1were used to calculate the material constants for establishing the corresponding constitutive equations. Furthermore, a comparative study has been made on the capability of the aforementioned models to predict the high-temperature deformation behavior by comparing the prediction relative errors, average absolute relative error, and correlation coefficient. The results show that multiple-linear model predicts the flow behavior more accurately than the Arrhenius type model. The ANN model is much more efficient and has a better prediction power for the as-forged Nitinol 60 alloy than both the Arrhenius type and multiple-linear models.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.07.03910.1016/j.msea.2008.07.039 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.07.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.07.028 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.05.05310.1016/j.commatsci.2012.05.053 ↗
4. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-010.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63068-510.1016/S1003-6326(14)63068-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01117-010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01117-0 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.01210.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.012 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.04.01010.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.04.010 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.02210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.022 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.05910.1016/j.msea.2009.08.059 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.intermet.2014.04.01510.1016/j.intermet.2014.04.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.02310.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.023 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60104-510.1016/S1003-6326(10)60104-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.00210.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.01710.1016/j.msea.2008.11.017 ↗
18. Thermo mechanical properties of Ni 60% weight Ti 40% weight
19. 10.1007/s11661-010-0338-810.1007/s11661-010-0338-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.18710.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.187 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11340-006-9004-x10.1007/s11340-006-9004-x ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.01910.1016/j.msea.2008.09.019 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.09010.1016/j.msea.2012.02.090 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.00910.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.04010.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.040 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.01410.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.014 ↗