journal article·2015-06-28

A comparative study on constitutive equations and artificial neural network model to predict high-temperature deformation behavior in Nitinol 60 shape memory alloy

Xiaoyong Shu, Shiqiang Lu, Kelu Wang, Guifa Li

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 30· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

The present study was conducted to predict the hot deformation behavior of the as-forged Nitinol 60 shape memory alloy by using the Arrhenius type, multiple-linear, and artificial neural network (ANN) models. The acquired flow stress data from isothermal hot compression tests in a temperature range of 650–850 °C under strain rate range of 0.01–1 s−1were used to calculate the material constants for establishing the corresponding constitutive equations. Furthermore, a comparative study has been made on the capability of the aforementioned models to predict the high-temperature deformation behavior by comparing the prediction relative errors, average absolute relative error, and correlation coefficient. The results show that multiple-linear model predicts the flow behavior more accurately than the Arrhenius type model. The ANN model is much more efficient and has a better prediction power for the as-forged Nitinol 60 alloy than both the Arrhenius type and multiple-linear models.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metallurgy and Material Forming · Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.07.03910.1016/j.msea.2008.07.039 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.07.02810.1016/j.commatsci.2012.07.028 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.05.05310.1016/j.commatsci.2012.05.053 ↗
4. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-010.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-0 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63068-510.1016/S1003-6326(14)63068-5 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01117-010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01117-0 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.01210.1016/j.matdes.2009.08.012 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.04.01010.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.04.010 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.02210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.03.022 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.00810.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.08.05910.1016/j.msea.2009.08.059 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.intermet.2014.04.01510.1016/j.intermet.2014.04.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.02310.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.023 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60104-510.1016/S1003-6326(10)60104-5 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.00210.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.11.01710.1016/j.msea.2008.11.017 ↗
18. Thermo mechanical properties of Ni 60% weight Ti 40% weight
19. 10.1007/s11661-010-0338-810.1007/s11661-010-0338-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.18710.1016/j.jallcom.2009.09.187 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11340-006-9004-x10.1007/s11340-006-9004-x ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2008.09.01910.1016/j.msea.2008.09.019 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.09010.1016/j.msea.2012.02.090 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.00910.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.04010.1016/j.commatsci.2014.05.040 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.01410.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.014 ↗