Effect of surface detection error due to elastic–plastic deformation on nanoindentation measurements of elastic modulus and hardness
Source abstract
Abstract
Elastic modulus and hardness are commonly measured using nanoindentation. Calculating these properties from measured force–displacement curves typically requires knowledge of the contact depth of the indenter into the specimen. However, surface detection methods in many nanoindentation experiments can lead to an error in the contact depth measurement and, subsequently, the measured properties. Here, the contributions of elastic and plastic deformations to surface detection errors in nanoindentation experiments are examined through experiments and modeling. The model is used to quantify errors in elastic modulus and hardness measurements due to elastic–plastic deformation during surface detection as a function of the specimen properties, indenter geometry, preload, and contact depth. Nanoindentation measurements on polystyrene, an aluminum alloy, and fused silica specimens with a Berkovich indenter are used to illustrate the effects of surface detection error and are compared to the model. The experiments and model both demonstrate that surface detection error can lead to measurement of apparent depth-dependent properties in homogenous materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7(6), 1564–1583 (1992)10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
2. W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: advances in understanding and refinements to methodology. J. Mater. Res. 19(1), 3–20 (2004)10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
3. M. Garcia, K.D. Schulze, C.S. O’Bryan, T. Bhattacharjee, W.G. Sawyer, T.E. Angelini, Eliminating the surface location from soft matter contact mechanics measurements. Trib. Mater. Surf. Inter. 11(4), 187–192 (2017)10.1080/17515831.2017.1397908 ↗
4. J. Deuschle, S. Enders, E. Arzt, Surface detection in nanoindentation of soft polymers. J. Mater. Res. 22(11), 3107–3119 (2017)10.1557/JMR.2007.0394 ↗
5. J.D. Kaufman, C.M. Klapperich, Surface detection errors cause overestimation of the modulus in nanoindentation on soft materials. J. Mech. Beh. Bio. Mater. 2(4), 312–317 (2009)10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.08.004 ↗
6. Z. Qian, G.B. McKenna, On the extreme depth dependence of the hardness of PDMS rubber: a problem of false surface detection. J. Poly. Sci. B: Poly. Phys. 55, 30–38 (2017)10.1002/polb.24147 ↗
7. Z. Qian, J. Risan, B. Stadnick, G.B. McKenna, J. Poly. Sci. B: Poly. Phys. 56, 414–428 (2017)10.1002/polb.24554 ↗
8. L. Lin, D. Kim, Measurement of the elastic modulus of polymeric films using an AFM with a steel micro-spherical probe tip. Poly. Test. 31, 926–930 (2012)10.1016/j.polymertesting.2012.06.012 ↗
9. C.M. Chong, D.C.C. Lam, Strain gradient plasticity effect in indentation hardness of polymers. J. Mater. Res. 14(10), 4103–4110 (1999)10.1557/JMR.1999.0554 ↗
10. G.M. Pharr, Measurement of mechanical properties by ultra-low load indentation. Mat. Sci. Eng. A253, 151–159 (1998)10.1016/S0921-5093(98)00724-2 ↗
11. J. Woirgard, J.-C. Dargenton, An alternative method for penetration depth determination in nanoindentation measurements. J. Mater. Res. 12(9), 2455–2458 (1997)10.1557/JMR.1997.0324 ↗
12. R.B. King, Elastic analysis of some punch problems for a layered medium. Int. J. Sol. Struct. 23(12), 1657–1664 (1987)10.1016/0020-7683(87)90116-8 ↗
13. I.N. Sneddon, Boussinesq’s Problem for a Rigid Cone. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 44, 492–507 (1947)10.1017/S0305004100024518 ↗
14. G.G. Bilodeau, Regular pyramid punch problem. J. Appl. Mech. 59, 519–523 (1992)10.1115/1.2893754 ↗
15. K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987), p. 156
16. C. Hardy, C.N. Baronet, G.V. Tordion, Elastoplastic indentation of a half-space by a rigid sphere. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 3(4), 451–462 (1971)10.1002/nme.1620030402 ↗
17. P.S. Follansbee, G.B. Sinclair, Quasi-static normal indentation of an elastic-plastic half-space by a rigid sphere. Int. J. Sol. Struct. 20(1), 81–91 (1984)10.1016/0020-7683(84)90078-7 ↗
18. D.M. Marsh, Plastic flow and fracture of glass. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 282(1388), 33–43 (1964)10.1098/rspa.1964.0210 ↗
19. R. Hill, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1950), p. 15
20. G.M. Pharr, A. Bolshakov, Understanding nanoindentation unloading curves. J. Mater. Res. 17(10), 2660–2671 (2002)10.1557/JMR.2002.0386 ↗
21. K.L. Johnson, The correlation of indentation experiments. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 18, 115–126 (1970)10.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
22. D. Tabor, Hardness of Metals (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1951).
23. H. Lan, T.A. Venkatesh, On the relationships between hardness and the elastic and plastic properties of isotropic power-law hardening materials. Philos. Mag. 94(1), 35–55 (2013)10.1080/14786435.2013.839889 ↗
24. T. Koch, S. Seidler, Correlations between indentation hardness and yield stress in thermoplastic polymers. Strain 45, 26–33 (2008)10.1111/j.1475-1305.2008.00468.x ↗
25. D. Tabor, The Hardness of Solids. Rev. Phys. Technol. 1, 145–179 (1970)10.1088/0034-6683/1/3/I01 ↗
26. O. Richmond, H.L. Morrison, M.L. Devenpeck, Sphere indentation with application to the Brinell hardness test. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 16, 75–82 (1974)10.1016/0020-7403(74)90034-4 ↗
27. G.M. Pharr, W.C. Oliver, Measurement of Thin Film Mechanical Properties Using Nanoindentation. MRS Bull. 17(7), 28–33 (1992)10.1557/S0883769400041634 ↗
28. J.E. Jakes, R.S. Lakes, D.S. Stone, Broadband nanoindentation of glassy polymers: Part I. Viscoelasticity. J. Mater. Res. 27(2), 463–474 (2012)10.1557/jmr.2011.363 ↗
29. J.E. Jakes, R.S. Lakes, D.S. Stone, Broadband nanoindentation of glassy polymers: Part II. Viscoelasticity. J. Mater. Res. 27(2), 475–484 (2012)10.1557/jmr.2011.364 ↗
30. B.J. Briscoe, L. Fiori, E. Pelillo, Nanoindentation of polymeric surfaces. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 31, 2395–2405 (1998)10.1088/0022-3727/31/19/006 ↗
31. M.E. Dokukin, I. Sokolov, On the measurements of rigidity modulus of soft materials in nanoindentation experiments at small depth. Macromolecules 45, 4277–4288 (2012)10.1021/ma202600b ↗
32. L. Li, L.M. Encarnacao, K.A. Brown, Polymer nanomechanics: separating the size effect from the substrate effect in nanoindentation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 043105 (2017)10.1063/1.4975057 ↗
33. G.Z. Voyiadjis, L. Malekotiei, A. Samadi-Dooki, Indentation size effect in amorphous polymers based on shear transformation mediated plasticity. Polymer 137, 72–81 (2018)10.1016/j.polymer.2018.01.006 ↗
34. S. Nikolov, C.-S. Han, D. Raabe, On the origin of size effects in small-strain elasticity of solid polymers. Int. J. Solids Struct. 44, 1582–1592 (2007)10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2006.06.039 ↗