A mean plastic strain fatigue–creep life prediction and reliability analysis of AISI H13 based on energy method
Source abstract
Abstract
Extrusion is an efficient hot working process to aluminum production and AISI H13 (4Cr5MoSiV1) as the main material of extrusion tool suffers from fatigue and creep damage due to its extreme working condition. A new mean plastic strain life prediction has been proposed based on the energy method. In addition, statistical analysis is also taken into consideration to complement this physic-based model due to other unmeasured and unknown exogenous influences. To validate the model, a series of AISI H13 fatigue and fatigue–creep tests were conducted at 500 °C close to the practical aluminum extrusion process. The strain-controlled tests were used for obtaining the parameters, while the stress-controlled tests were utilized for validating the proposed model. It shows that the model predictions were in good agreement with the experimental results.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fatigue and fracture mechanics · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/ffe.1257010.1111/ffe.12570 ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01431.x10.1111/j.1460-2695.2009.01431.x ↗
3. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.03810.1016/j.msea.2012.04.038 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.15610.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.02.156 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.00110.1016/j.strusafe.2009.08.001 ↗
6. Investigation of crack propagation in X38CrMoV5 (AISI H11) tool steel at elevated temperatures10.1016/j.proeng.2010.03.220 ↗
7. 10.1177/095441001664144810.1177/0954410016641448 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.04610.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.04.046 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.12.00210.1016/j.ijpvp.2014.12.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.11.05810.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.11.058 ↗
11. 10.1177/10567895920010020410.1177/105678959200100204 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.08310.1016/j.msea.2014.01.083 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.07.00810.1016/j.ymssp.2012.07.008 ↗
14. 10.1177/105678951143278910.1177/1056789511432789 ↗
15. Normalization of fatigue crack growth data in AISI H11 tool steel at room and elevated temperature
16. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.09.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.09.004 ↗
17. 10.1080/09603409.2016.125288810.1080/09603409.2016.1252888 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.04.02110.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.04.021 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10704-007-9116-z10.1007/s10704-007-9116-z ↗
20. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.01.01310.1016/j.procir.2015.01.013 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.01910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.06.019 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msea.2004.11.05010.1016/j.msea.2004.11.050 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.00810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2006.07.008 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.00910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.04.00510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.04.005 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.08.01510.1016/j.engfailanal.2009.08.015 ↗
27. 10.1177/105678951665192010.1177/1056789516651920 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.11.09710.1016/j.msea.2014.11.097 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2014.05.01510.1016/j.optlastec.2014.05.015 ↗