journal article·2020-08-14

Selective laser melting of graphene oxide–reinforced Ti–48Al–2Cr–2Nb: Improved manufacturability and mechanical strength

Xing Zhang, Bo Mao, Yiliang Liao, Yufeng Zheng

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 35· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

Severe cracking and unsatisfied mechanical performance are the major challenges of manufacturing titanium aluminide (TiAl) components by selective laser melting (SLM). In this work, graphene oxide (GO) sheets were introduced onto the metal powder surface to improve the manufacturability of SLM of a Ti–48Al–2Cr–2Nb (at.%) alloy and enhance the mechanical strength of the laser-fabricated parts. The effect of laser power and GO content on the macromorphology of single-track processing was investigated, showing that the crack-free track could be obtained with the addition of 0.1–0.5 wt.% GO under a laser power of 110 W. In addition, the characterization of multilayer buildups via electron backscatter diffraction and backscatter electron imaging reveals the grain refinement during SLM of GO/TiAl nanocomposites. Finally, the strength of the as-built samples was examined using micro-hardness test, showing a maximal increase of 21.9% by adding 0.3 wt.% GO into the TiAl powders from laser-fabricated samples without GO.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.20610.1016/j.jallcom.2016.07.206 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.00210.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.06.002 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2014.03.01210.1016/j.pnsc.2014.03.012 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.05810.1016/j.carbon.2013.11.058 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.cgd.6b0169110.1021/acs.cgd.6b01691 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.03410.1016/j.matdes.2017.08.034 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41598-018-20150-510.1038/s41598-018-20150-5 ↗
8. 10.1007/s11665-015-1696-610.1007/s11665-015-1696-6 ↗
9. 10.1557/jmr.2019.6510.1557/jmr.2019.65 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.01310.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.013 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2016.11.00210.1016/j.optlastec.2016.11.002 ↗
12. 10.1080/09603409.2016.117151010.1080/09603409.2016.1171510 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.11.02810.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.11.028 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.intermet.2015.07.00510.1016/j.intermet.2015.07.005 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.04.00210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.04.002 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.02.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.02.022 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.04610.1016/j.carbon.2013.08.046 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.msea.2018.08.08710.1016/j.msea.2018.08.087 ↗
19. 10.1088/0957-4484/25/32/32560110.1088/0957-4484/25/32/325601 ↗
20. 10.1039/C2NJ40493A10.1039/C2NJ40493A ↗
21. 10.1016/j.intermet.2016.03.00110.1016/j.intermet.2016.03.001 ↗
22. Effect of interpass temperature on in situ alloying and additive manufacturing of titanium aluminides using gas tungsten arc welding
23. 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.06310.1016/j.carbon.2009.12.063 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.16310.1016/j.jallcom.2017.09.163 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.23710.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.237 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.07710.1016/j.matdes.2016.07.077 ↗
27. Effect of building direction on the microstructure and tensile properties of Ti–48Al–2Cr–2Nb alloy additively manufactured by electron beam melting
28. 10.1016/S0966-9795(98)00037-510.1016/S0966-9795(98)00037-5 ↗
29. 10.1080/09603409.2016.118306810.1080/09603409.2016.1183068 ↗
30. 10.2351/1.508520610.2351/1.5085206 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10821210.1016/j.matdes.2019.108212 ↗
32. Loeber · 2011 · 547
33. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.00310.1016/j.actamat.2017.07.003 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.01.03110.1016/j.msea.2015.01.031 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.18610.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.186 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.02210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.12.022 ↗