journal article·2018-04-27

Microstructure characteristics and constitutive modeling for elevated temperature flow behavior of Al–Cu–Li X2A66 alloy

Liwei Zhong, Wenli Gao, Zhaohui Feng, Zheng Lu, Guoling Mao

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 33· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

Uniaxial compression tests at the temperatures of 573–773 K and strain rates of 0.01–10 s−1were conducted to investigate the hot deformation behavior and microstructural evolution of Al–Cu–Li X2A66 alloy. The results indicate that the main dynamic softening mechanisms of the alloy are dynamic recovery and partial dynamic recrystallization. The flow stress increases obviously with the decrease of temperature or the increase of strain rate. The material constants considering the effect of strain were determined by sixth-order polynomial fitting based on the corrected data. The developed Arrhenius-type constitutive equation coupling temperature, strain rate, and strain was established and could well predict the flow stress in the whole range of temperatures and strain rates except at 1 s−1and 573 K. Moreover, the values of correlation coefficient and average absolute relative error were calculated, which further proved that the proposed constitutive model has high accuracy and reliability.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/B978-0-12-401698-9.00001-X10.1016/B978-0-12-401698-9.00001-X ↗
2. 10.1007/BF0274399310.1007/BF02743993 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.04510.1016/j.matdes.2014.10.045 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.02.09010.1016/j.msea.2012.02.090 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.02910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.03.029 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.00410.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.004 ↗
7. 10.1557/jmr.2015.14410.1557/jmr.2015.144 ↗
8. 10.1179/09506606979013805610.1179/095066069790138056 ↗
9. 10.1557/jmr.2017.7710.1557/jmr.2017.77 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.05.00810.1016/j.ijpvp.2015.05.008 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0167-6636(97)00035-510.1016/S0167-6636(97)00035-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.02910.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.029 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.00210.1016/j.matdes.2013.12.002 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.05210.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.052 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2016.06.01810.1016/j.mechmat.2016.06.018 ↗
16. 10.1557/jmr.2015.36810.1557/jmr.2015.368 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.170736310.1063/1.1707363 ↗
18. 10.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-010.1016/0001-6160(66)90207-0 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.04810.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.048 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.08.00310.1016/j.commatsci.2010.08.003 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.02110.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.09.021 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.02310.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.023 ↗
23. 10.1557/jmr.2017.35610.1557/jmr.2017.356 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.03310.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.033 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.04010.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.040 ↗
26. 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)01117-010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01117-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.05210.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.052 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.12.02310.1016/j.msea.2011.12.023 ↗
29. 10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63128-910.1016/S1003-6326(14)63128-9 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.03.03310.1016/j.msea.2014.03.033 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.11310.1016/j.matdes.2015.12.113 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.00910.1016/j.matdes.2013.03.009 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.msea.2015.07.00710.1016/j.msea.2015.07.007 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.asoc.2005.02.00210.1016/j.asoc.2005.02.002 ↗
35. 10.1016/S1003-6326(11)60733-410.1016/S1003-6326(11)60733-4 ↗
36. 10.1179/mht.2006.00510.1179/mht.2006.005 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.25710.1016/j.jallcom.2015.06.257 ↗
38. 10.1016/B978-0-12-401698-9.00015-X10.1016/B978-0-12-401698-9.00015-X ↗