journal article·2018-03-28

Substrate-independent stress–strain behavior of diamond-like carbon thin films by nanoindentation with a spherical tip

Naoki Fujisawa, Teng Fei Zhang, Oi Lun Li, Kwang Ho Kim

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 33· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

A method for extracting the substrate-independent stress–strain curves of thin films was developed using spherical nanoindentation to investigate the yield behavior of diamond-like carbon (DLC) thin films with Young’s moduli of ∼73 GPa and ∼76 GPa. The resulting stress–strain curves showed that these films commence yielding at ∼13 GPa and ∼14 GPa, respectively. These yield strength values agree with the critical pressure necessary to initiate the transformation ofsp2-bonded carbon into significantly hardersp3-bonded carbon, indicating that the yielding of the materials is associated with thesp2-to-sp3phase transition. The ability of a DLC film to accommodate a progressively increasing contact stress with strain beyond the yield point while dissipating part of the accumulated strain energy, as evidenced in this work, implies a unique mechanism of thebrittlematerial for passively mitigating contact deformation and fracture in tribological applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.24550210.1103/PhysRevLett.93.245502 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)01102-710.1016/S0040-6090(03)01102-7 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.467910.1103/PhysRevB.34.4679 ↗
4. 10.1098/rspa.1909.002110.1098/rspa.1909.0021 ↗
5. 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-710.1016/S1359-6454(01)00328-7 ↗
6. 10.1557/jmr.2011.810.1557/jmr.2011.8 ↗
7. 10.1557/JMR.1993.029710.1557/JMR.1993.0297 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.08210.1016/j.carbon.2017.06.082 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.36097910.1063/1.360979 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.mser.2015.02.00110.1016/j.mser.2015.02.001 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.wear.2004.12.03210.1016/j.wear.2004.12.032 ↗
12. 10.1088/0022-3727/39/18/R0110.1088/0022-3727/39/18/R01 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0925-9635(98)00262-310.1016/S0925-9635(98)00262-3 ↗
14. 10.1557/jmr.2016.42810.1557/jmr.2016.428 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0043-1648(00)00488-910.1016/S0043-1648(00)00488-9 ↗
16. 10.1098/rspa.1999.042310.1098/rspa.1999.0423 ↗
17. 10.1016/0956-7151(93)90194-W10.1016/0956-7151(93)90194-W ↗
18. Elastic contact versus indentation modeling of multi-layered materials10.1016/0020-7683(92)90004-D ↗
19. 10.1557/JMR.2001.028610.1557/JMR.2001.0286 ↗
20. Tabor · 1951
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.23610.1103/PhysRevB.35.236 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-1-4419-9872-910.1007/978-1-4419-9872-9 ↗
23. 10.1016/0008-6223(96)00170-410.1016/0008-6223(96)00170-4 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0925-9635(98)00284-210.1016/S0925-9635(98)00284-2 ↗
25. Song · 1999 · 51
26. 10.1063/1.36646910.1063/1.366469 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01512-010.1016/S0040-6090(98)01512-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2013.03.00310.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2013.03.003 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.03610.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.036 ↗
30. 10.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-310.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.156680010.1063/1.1566800 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.16210.1016/j.apsusc.2014.12.162 ↗
33. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
34. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90018-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90018-9 ↗
35. Hertz · 1896 · 146