journal article·2020-07-28Open access

Influence of the deformation rate on phase stability and mechanical properties of a Ti–29Nb–13Ta–4.6Zr–xO alloy analyzed byin situhigh-energy X-ray diffraction during compression tests

Murillo R. da Silva, Piter Gargarella, Athos H. Plaine, Rodrigo J. Contieri, Simon Pauly, Uta Kühn, Claudemiro Bolfarini

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 35· Issue 14

Abstract

In this work, a Ti–29Nb–13Ta–4.6Zr–xO Gum Metal with two significantly different oxygen levels (388 and 3570 ppm) was investigated during deformation. The alloys were compressed duringin situhigh-energy X-ray diffraction using three different strain rates, 10−4, 10−3, and 10−1s−1, in order to evaluate their influence on phase stability and mechanical properties. The influence of oxygen on the deformation process was also studied. Deformation takes place by twinning, stress-induced, and reverse martensitic transformation and was observed, for some samples, a spinodal decomposition of the β-phase during elastic deformation. The mechanical properties were similar for the different rates employed when considering the same oxygen level. The alloy with a higher amount of oxygen, however, showed a substantial increase in mechanical strength, with a yield strength of around 680 MPa, which is more than three times higher than for the specimen with 388 ppm of oxygen.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.04910.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.049 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.04910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.049 ↗
3. 10.1179/1743290114Y.000000010810.1179/1743290114Y.0000000108 ↗
4. Lütjering · 2007 · 449
5. 10.1002/adem.20190125810.1002/adem.201901258 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.02710.1016/j.msea.2005.06.027 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.031 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.01010.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.010 ↗
9. Bönisch · 2016 · 160
10. 10.3139/146.10132710.3139/146.101327 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00277-710.1016/S1359-6454(96)00277-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.01310.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.013 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.25910.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.259 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.04710.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.047 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.05410.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.054 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma701054210.3390/ma7010542 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.06.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.06.027 ↗
18. 10.14311/AP.2018.58.017910.14311/AP.2018.58.0179 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.07910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.079 ↗
20. 14. Morinaga, M. , Kato, M. , Kamimura, T. , Fukumoto, M. , Harada, I. , and Kubo, K. : Theoretical design of β-type titanium alloys. In Proceedings of Seventh World Conference on Titanium, (Titanium’ 92, Science and Technology, San Diego, CA, USA, 1992); pp. 217–224.
21. 10.1126/science.108195710.1126/science.1081957 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0927-0256(98)00124-410.1016/S0927-0256(98)00124-4 ↗
23. 10.1557/jmr.2019.36110.1557/jmr.2019.361 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00286-310.1016/S1044-5803(02)00286-3 ↗
25. 10.1002/adem.20180121510.1002/adem.201801215 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.01210.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.012 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma701023210.3390/ma7010232 ↗
28. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-046210.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-0462 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.01710.1016/j.msea.2006.03.017 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.04910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.049 ↗
31. 10.1557/jmr.2009.033210.1557/jmr.2009.0332 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.05010.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.050 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41598-017-13074-z10.1038/s41598-017-13074-z ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.07710.1016/j.msea.2012.04.077 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.04.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.04.022 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-017-01578-110.1038/s41467-017-01578-1 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.295918310.1063/1.2959183 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.03410.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.034 ↗
39. The effect of omega phase on the mechanical properties of titanium alloys10.1007/BF02913423 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.00810.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.008 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10806410.1016/j.matdes.2019.108064 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.03.02910.1016/j.msea.2013.03.029 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.intermet.2010.09.01410.1016/j.intermet.2010.09.014 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.02610.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.026 ↗
45. 10.1557/jmr.2020.9010.1557/jmr.2020.90 ↗
46. 10.1080/02670836.2016.121603010.1080/02670836.2016.1216030 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.01110.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.011 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.04210.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.042 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.06910.1016/j.msea.2014.09.069 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.12.03710.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.12.037 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.00610.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.006 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.18010.1016/j.msea.2006.02.180 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.13810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.138 ↗
54. 10.3139/146.11018410.3139/146.110184 ↗
55. 10.1007/s11661-015-3089-810.1007/s11661-015-3089-8 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.07.09610.1016/j.msea.2016.07.096 ↗