Influence of the deformation rate on phase stability and mechanical properties of a Ti–29Nb–13Ta–4.6Zr–xO alloy analyzed byin situhigh-energy X-ray diffraction during compression tests
Source abstract
Abstract
In this work, a Ti–29Nb–13Ta–4.6Zr–xO Gum Metal with two significantly different oxygen levels (388 and 3570 ppm) was investigated during deformation. The alloys were compressed duringin situhigh-energy X-ray diffraction using three different strain rates, 10−4, 10−3, and 10−1s−1, in order to evaluate their influence on phase stability and mechanical properties. The influence of oxygen on the deformation process was also studied. Deformation takes place by twinning, stress-induced, and reverse martensitic transformation and was observed, for some samples, a spinodal decomposition of the β-phase during elastic deformation. The mechanical properties were similar for the different rates employed when considering the same oxygen level. The alloy with a higher amount of oxygen, however, showed a substantial increase in mechanical strength, with a yield strength of around 680 MPa, which is more than three times higher than for the specimen with 388 ppm of oxygen.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (56)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.04910.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.049 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.04910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.06.049 ↗
3. 10.1179/1743290114Y.000000010810.1179/1743290114Y.0000000108 ↗
4. Lütjering · 2007 · 449
5. 10.1002/adem.20190125810.1002/adem.201901258 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msea.2005.06.02710.1016/j.msea.2005.06.027 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.03110.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.10.031 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.01010.1016/j.actbio.2009.11.010 ↗
9. Bönisch · 2016 · 160
10. 10.3139/146.10132710.3139/146.101327 ↗
11. 10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00277-710.1016/S1359-6454(96)00277-7 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.01310.1016/j.actamat.2008.11.013 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.25910.1016/j.jallcom.2018.02.259 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.04710.1016/j.jmrt.2019.06.047 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.05410.1016/j.actamat.2015.08.054 ↗
16. 10.3390/ma701054210.3390/ma7010542 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.06.02710.1016/j.scriptamat.2016.06.027 ↗
18. 10.14311/AP.2018.58.017910.14311/AP.2018.58.0179 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.07910.1016/j.jallcom.2019.04.079 ↗
20. 14. Morinaga, M. , Kato, M. , Kamimura, T. , Fukumoto, M. , Harada, I. , and Kubo, K. : Theoretical design of β-type titanium alloys. In Proceedings of Seventh World Conference on Titanium, (Titanium’ 92, Science and Technology, San Diego, CA, USA, 1992); pp. 217–224.
21. 10.1126/science.108195710.1126/science.1081957 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0927-0256(98)00124-410.1016/S0927-0256(98)00124-4 ↗
23. 10.1557/jmr.2019.36110.1557/jmr.2019.361 ↗
24. 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00286-310.1016/S1044-5803(02)00286-3 ↗
25. 10.1002/adem.20180121510.1002/adem.201801215 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.01210.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.012 ↗
27. 10.3390/ma701023210.3390/ma7010232 ↗
28. 10.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-046210.1590/1980-5373-mr-2018-0462 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.01710.1016/j.msea.2006.03.017 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.04910.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.049 ↗
31. 10.1557/jmr.2009.033210.1557/jmr.2009.0332 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.05010.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.050 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41598-017-13074-z10.1038/s41598-017-13074-z ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msea.2012.04.07710.1016/j.msea.2012.04.077 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.04.02210.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.04.022 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41467-017-01578-110.1038/s41467-017-01578-1 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.295918310.1063/1.2959183 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.03410.1016/j.matchar.2018.09.034 ↗
39. The effect of omega phase on the mechanical properties of titanium alloys10.1007/BF02913423 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.00810.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.008 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10806410.1016/j.matdes.2019.108064 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.03.02910.1016/j.msea.2013.03.029 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.intermet.2010.09.01410.1016/j.intermet.2010.09.014 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.02610.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.03.026 ↗
45. 10.1557/jmr.2020.9010.1557/jmr.2020.90 ↗
46. 10.1080/02670836.2016.121603010.1080/02670836.2016.1216030 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.01110.1016/j.actamat.2015.12.011 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.04210.1016/j.actamat.2015.06.042 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.06910.1016/j.msea.2014.09.069 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.12.03710.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.12.037 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.00610.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.006 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.18010.1016/j.msea.2006.02.180 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.13810.1016/j.jallcom.2019.03.138 ↗
54. 10.3139/146.11018410.3139/146.110184 ↗
55. 10.1007/s11661-015-3089-810.1007/s11661-015-3089-8 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.msea.2016.07.09610.1016/j.msea.2016.07.096 ↗