journal article·2019-02-28

Indentation size effect in aqueous electrophoretic deposition zirconia dental ceramic

Lei Wang, Isaac Asempah, Xu Li, Sheng-Qi Zang, Yan-Fei Zhou, Jie Ding, Lei Jin

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 34· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Highly dense zirconia dental ceramic coatings were fabricated by aqueous electrophoretic deposition (EPD) and subsequently sintered between 1250 and 1450 °C. Microstructural examination revealed that aqueous EPDZrO2coatings possessed a tetragonal phase structure and the grain size increased with increasing sintering temperature. Nanoindentation study proved that the aqueous EPDZrO2coating also had excellent mechanical properties. The effect of different applied loads on hardness and elastic modulus of the 1350 °C-sintered sample at room temperature was investigated by the method of progressive multicycle measurement nanoindentation. The simulative experiment proved that hardness of aqueous EPDZrO2exhibited reverse indentation size effect (ISE) behavior and then displayed the normal ISE response. The analysis indicates that the reverse ISE is attributed to the relaxation of surface stresses resulting from indentation cracks at small loads and normal ISE is caused by geometrically necessary dislocations. The tetragonal—monoclinic stress-induced phase transformation during nanoindentation is the primary cause of dental zirconia failures.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-410.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4 ↗
2. On the generality of the relationship among contact stiffness, contact area, and elastic modulus during indentation10.1557/JMR.1992.0613 ↗
3. 10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-410.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4 ↗
4. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
5. Jin · 2011
6. Size effect in the initiation of plasticity for ceramics in nanoindentation10.1016/j.jmps.2007.10.003 ↗
7. Johnson · 1996
8. 10.4012/dmj.26.62310.4012/dmj.26.623 ↗
9. CAD/CAM-fabricated implant-supported restorations: A systematic review10.1111/clr.12633 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.13610.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.136 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.dental.2003.05.00210.1016/j.dental.2003.05.002 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00784-014-1330-210.1007/s00784-014-1330-2 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.08.03710.1016/j.matlet.2013.08.037 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.02910.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.11.029 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04853.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1987.tb04853.x ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.01910.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.03.019 ↗
17. 10.1557/JMR.1992.045010.1557/JMR.1992.0450 ↗
18. A systematic review of the clinical performance of CAD/CAM single-tooth restorations
19. 10.1002/crat.20090038510.1002/crat.200900385 ↗
20. 10.1080/14328917.2003.1178476810.1080/14328917.2003.11784768 ↗
21. Mechanical properties and microstructure of hypomineralised enamel of permanent teeth10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.044 ↗
22. 10.1023/A:102494721060410.1023/A:1024947210604 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.08.36710.1016/j.dental.2014.08.367 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.01510.1016/j.electacta.2012.01.015 ↗
25. 10.1088/1748-6041/10/5/05500910.1088/1748-6041/10/5/055009 ↗
26. 10.1007/BF0035290810.1007/BF00352908 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00043-910.1016/S0300-5712(00)00043-9 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.01610.1016/j.dental.2014.02.016 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.09810.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.098 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.06.11310.1016/j.msea.2014.06.113 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.02610.1016/j.apsusc.2014.05.026 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.07.00110.1016/j.pmatsci.2006.07.001 ↗
33. 10.3139/146.03078710.3139/146.030787 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.01510.1016/j.dental.2014.11.015 ↗
35. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis
36. 10.3390/ma302086310.3390/ma3020863 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.00710.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.00810.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.008 ↗
39. Alternating current electrophoretic deposition (AC-EPD) of SiC nanoparticles in an aqueous suspension for the fabrication of SiCf/SiC composites
40. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.02.05410.1016/j.jcis.2012.02.054 ↗
41. 10.1039/c2ra01342h10.1039/c2ra01342h ↗
42. 10.1557/jmr.2006.025710.1557/jmr.2006.0257 ↗
43. 10.4103/2231-0762.15801410.4103/2231-0762.158014 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0955-2219(98)00078-810.1016/S0955-2219(98)00078-8 ↗
45. Bubble-free aqueous electrophoretic deposition (EPD) by pulse-potential application10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02591.x ↗
46. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.09.10110.1016/j.msea.2014.09.101 ↗
47. 10.1002/adem.20120036710.1002/adem.201200367 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.311008710.1063/1.3110087 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.05.00610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.05.006 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0254-0584(99)00216-310.1016/S0254-0584(99)00216-3 ↗
51. 10.1002/crat.20041036210.1002/crat.200410362 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10853-005-0666-z10.1007/s10853-005-0666-z ↗
53. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-910.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-9 ↗
54. 10.1016/S1359-6462(00)00520-010.1016/S1359-6462(00)00520-0 ↗