journal article·2020-10-14

Dynamic mechanical properties of closed-cell aluminum foams with uniform and graded densities

Ying Zhao, Chenyang Ma, Dabo Xin, Ming Sun

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 35· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the quasi-static and dynamic mechanical behaviors and the energy absorption capacity of closed-cell aluminum foams with uniform and graded densities were experimentally studied. The effects of density, strain rate, and graded density on the mechanical performances of aluminum foams were quantitatively evaluated. It was shown that the density had a significant effect on the quasi-static and dynamic compressive stress of aluminum foams. Moreover, impact compression experiment results revealed that aluminum foam was sensitive to the strain rate. As the strain rate increased, the plateau stress and energy absorption capacity increased distinctly and the rate of deformation increased correspondingly. Finally, the investigation of aluminum foams with uniform and graded densities to study their deformation and failure mechanisms, mechanical characteristics, and energy absorption capacities showed that the GD 0.48-IV specimen exhibited superior impact resistance. The present work can provide a valuable reference for the optimum design of aluminum foam against impact loading.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Material Properties and Processing · Fluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.msea.2009.03.06710.1016/j.msea.2009.03.067 ↗
2. Design and testing of an energy absorber prototype based on aluminum foams10.1016/j.matdes.2010.02.025 ↗
3. Compressive deformation and energy absorption characteristics of closed cell aluminum-fly ash particle composite foam10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.019 ↗
4. Simulation and optimization of blast-resistant performance of graded aluminum foam sandwich structures
5. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06987.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1994.tb06987.x ↗
6. Review of the development of Hopkinson pressure bar technique in China
7. 10.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-010.1016/S0734-743X(99)00153-0 ↗
8. 10.1002/adem.20080009110.1002/adem.200800091 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.10010.1016/j.msea.2017.01.100 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.05010.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.050 ↗
11. Mini round-Robin test on the Split-Hopkinson pressure bar10.1520/JTE20160054 ↗
12. Ashby · 2000
13. 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01219-310.1016/S0921-5093(00)01219-3 ↗
14. 10.1017/CBO978113987832610.1017/CBO9781139878326 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00100-910.1016/S0263-8223(02)00100-9 ↗
16. 10.1007/BF0233110910.1007/BF02331109 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.msea.2014.01.07610.1016/j.msea.2014.01.076 ↗
18. Partition energy absorption of axially crushed aluminum foam-filled hat sections10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.09.050 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.09210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.092 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2011.08.06610.1016/j.msea.2011.08.066 ↗
21. Impact perforation of sandwich panels with aluminum foam core: A numerical and analytical study10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.05.013 ↗
22. An experimental study on the behaviour under impact loading of metallic cellular materials10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.12.012 ↗
23. 10.1115/1.170462610.1115/1.1704626 ↗
24. Compressive behavior of closed-cell aluminum alloy foams at medium strain rates10.1016/j.msea.2010.12.059 ↗
25. 10.1260/2041-4196.2.3.33310.1260/2041-4196.2.3.333 ↗
26. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.82.46110.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.82.461 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00038-X10.1016/S1359-6462(99)00038-X ↗
28. Comparison of quasi-static and dynamic compression behavior of closed-cell aluminum foam10.1016/j.msea.2009.07.017 ↗
29. Impact behaviour testing of aluminium foam10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.07.002 ↗