journal article·2018-09-14

Analysis for efficiency potential of crystalline Si solar cells

Masafumi Yamaguchi, Kan-Hua Lee, Kenji Araki, Nobuaki Kojima, Yoshio Ohshita

Journal of Materials Research· Volume 33· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Efficiency potential of crystalline Si solar cells is analyzed by considering external radiative efficiency (ERE), voltage, and fill factor losses. Crystalline Si solar cells have an efficiency potential of more than 28.5% by realizing ERE of 20% from about 5% and normalized resistance of less than 0.05 from around 0.1. Nonradiative recombination losses in single-crystalline and multicrystalline Si solar cells are also discussed. Especially, nonrecombination and resistance losses in multicrystalline Si solar cells are shown to be higher than those of single-crystalline cells. Importance of further improvement of minority-carrier lifetime in crystalline Si solar cells is suggested for further improvement of crystalline Si solar cells. High efficiency of more than 28.5% will be realized by realizing high minority-carrier lifetime of more than 30 ms. Key issues for those ends are reduction in carbon concentration of less than 1 × 1014cm−3, oxygen precipitated and dislocations even in single-crystalline Si solar cells, and reduction in dislocation density of less than 3 × 103cm−2in multicrystalline Si solar cells.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Higasa · 2014
2. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.227035110.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2270351 ↗
3. Yamamoto · 2016 · 197
4. 3. Ahrenkiel R.K. : Minority-carrier lifetime in III–V semiconductors. In Semiconductors and Semimetsals, Vol. 39, Ahrenkiel R.K. and Lundstrom M.S. , eds. (Academic Press, Boston); ch. 2, p. 58.10.1016/S0080-8784(08)62594-6 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.physb.2005.12.06210.1016/j.physb.2005.12.062 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.16520210.1103/PhysRevB.86.165202 ↗
7. 10.1557/jmr.2017.33510.1557/jmr.2017.335 ↗
8. Glunz · 2017 · 117
9. 10.1063/1.12234510.1063/1.122345 ↗
10. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3210.1038/nenergy.2017.32 ↗
11. Nakamura · 2014 · 283
12. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.235215110.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2352151 ↗
13. 10.1143/JJAP.21.110.1143/JJAP.21.1 ↗
14. 2003
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.08530310.1103/PhysRevB.76.085303 ↗
16. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.228273710.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2282737 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.06.03510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.06.035 ↗
18. Jin · 2017 · 153
19. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.01402010.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.014020 ↗
20. Kakimoto · 2017 · 119
21. 10.1002/pip.278810.1002/pip.2788 ↗
22. Swanson · 2005 · 584
23. Green · 1998
24. 10.1063/1.8969410.1063/1.89694 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.9146410.1063/1.91464 ↗
26. Defect formation in the cooling process after CZ-Si growth
27. 10.1002/pip.114710.1002/pip.1147 ↗
28. Masada · 2017