Investigations into the slip behavior of zirconium diboride
Source abstract
Abstract
The slip systems in ZrB2flexural tested at 1000 °C and 1500 °C have been quantified. The dislocations in both samples were long and straight with a dislocation density of approximately 1013m−2. The structure of the dislocations as well as the low density is in agreement with a ceramic that is hard and brittle and dislocation nucleation and motion is restricted. The low temperature slip systems were found to include c-prismatic slip—({1 mathord{left/ {vphantom {1 {3left[{0001} ight]left({ar 1010} ight)}}} ight. kern- ulldelimiterspace} {3left[{0001} ight]left({ar 1010} ight)}})—and a-pyramidal slip—({1 mathord{left/ {vphantom {1 {3left[{11ar 20} ight]left({ar 1101} ight)}}} ight. kern- ulldelimiterspace} {3left[{11ar 20} ight]left({ar 1101} ight)}})whereas the elevated temperature sample revealed a-basal slip—({1 mathord{left/ {vphantom {1 {3left[{11ar 20} ight]left({0001} ight)}}} ight. kern- ulldelimiterspace} {3left[{11ar 20} ight]left({0001} ight)}}). Density functional theory Generalized Stacking Fault Energy curves for perfect slip were calculated and agreed well with geometric considerations for slip, including interplanar spacing and planar packing. Though basal slip has the lowest fault energy, the presence of the other dislocation types is suggestive that the activation barrier is not a hindrance for the temperatures studied and is likely activated to increase the number of plastic degrees of freedom.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.04310.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.043 ↗
2. 10.1016/S0955-2219(99)00129-610.1016/S0955-2219(99)00129-6 ↗
3. UHTC composites for hypersonic applications
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.16550210.1103/PhysRevLett.114.165502 ↗
5. 10.1080/1478643610823967910.1080/14786436108239679 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.09.02110.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2014.09.021 ↗
7. 10.1016/0022-5088(76)90105-310.1016/0022-5088(76)90105-3 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.04.00210.1016/j.commatsci.2008.04.002 ↗
9. Hull · 2011 · 1
10. 10.1007/BF0113241110.1007/BF01132411 ↗
11. 10.1007/978-0-387-76501-310.1007/978-0-387-76501-3 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.11.00810.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.11.008 ↗
13. 10.1111/jace.1211410.1111/jace.12114 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01583.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01583.x ↗
15. Steinitz
16. Murata · 1970
17. Materials for ultrahigh temperature structural applications
18. Campbell · 1967
19. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.08.03810.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.08.038 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.03.02410.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.03.024 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
23. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1971.tb12210.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1971.tb12210.x ↗
24. 10.1016/0022-5088(77)90200-410.1016/0022-5088(77)90200-4 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
28. 10.1111/jace.1402910.1111/jace.14029 ↗
29. 10.1023/A:100452952716210.1023/A:1004529527162 ↗
30. 10.1016/0956-7151(94)90308-510.1016/0956-7151(94)90308-5 ↗